To: Reaganesque
Given the injuries listed, it sounds like the governor may not have been wearing his seatbelt.Yes, I meant to say that in Post 1--forgot the seatbelt part. He was in the front seat and not wearing a seatbelt. I think that's against the law in NJ.
9 posted on
04/13/2007 5:41:33 AM PDT by
randita
To: randita
He was in the front seat and not wearing a seatbelt. I think that's against the law in NJ.I believe that it's against the law in all 50 states - Clinton's federal highway funds "blackmail" made sure of that.
Regardless, the laws are only for the "little people" - a democRAT governer shouldn't be expected to have to obey them.
13 posted on
04/13/2007 5:46:14 AM PDT by
meyer
(Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
To: randita
"He was in the front seat and not wearing a seatbelt. I think that's against the law in NJ."
It's against the law in New York State as well.
29 posted on
04/13/2007 6:05:19 AM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson