Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolf numbers continue to grow
Billings Gazette ^ | March 20, 2007 | MIKE STARK

Posted on 04/14/2007 7:32:16 PM PDT by george76

There are now at least 1,300 wolves prowling Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, far more than anyone imagined when the species was reintroduced in the Northern Rockies 12 years ago.

The wolf population has, on average, grown by about 26 percent a year for the past decade. The latest estimates, which summarize counts completed at the end of 2006, show they aren't slowing down.

"I keep thinking we're at the top end of the bubble," said Ed Bangs, wolf recovery coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "I can't see that there's room for any more, but we'll see."

As the wolf population has grown, so have the reports of cattle, sheep and other livestock being killed...

It's no surprise that wolves are thriving following reintroduction in 1995 and 1996 in Yellowstone National Park and in central Idaho. Wolves are skilled predators, fast breeders and able to live in different environments.

The fastest-growing area for wolves last year was in Wyoming outside Yellowstone National Park. The number of wolves jumped by 31 percent...

With that increase, 123 cattle were reportedly killed by wolves, more than has ever been recorded in Wyoming since the reintroduction...

In Montana, the number of wolves grew by 19 percent...

The number of elk, which are wolves' primary winter prey, has declined 50 percent in the area since 1995...

The Fish and Wildlife Service said the wolf population has, for seven years, met basic recovery goals of 30 breeding pairs distributed across Montana, Wyoming and Idaho.

The agency has recommended removing wolves from the endangered species list. But the process has become mired in a conflict between the federal government and the state of Wyoming.

(Excerpt) Read more at casperstartribune.net ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: Colorado; US: Idaho; US: Montana; US: Oregon; US: Utah; US: Washington; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: animalrights; ar; bangs; edbangs; elk; endangered; endangeredspecies; g79; hunting; nps; sss; usfws; wildlife; wolf; wolfattacks; wolfpack; wolfpacks; wolves; wolvesattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: calex59; All

Here in the East, Bambi lovers are very upset at thinning the herds of dear that are causing large numbers of auto accidents, and eating up all the shrubbery. Now that there is a rapidly growing amount of Lymes Disease in the area, the fight for reasonable amount of kills is gaining support. There have been deer entering McDonalds, and posh stores in recent years. Very eclectic tastes.

In a related note, there are now coyotes in Rock Creek Park in Washington, DC. Significant numbers in Maryland as well. They are enjoying eating small pets as well as wild food. Perhaps when a few congresspeople have their pets eating they will wake up to the need for rational wildlife management which includes both protection and hunting.

A few years ago I bought land in West Virginia. In the eight miles before reaching this land, I would count from 20 to 35 deer near the road. Then we had a winter with 42” of snow on the ground. Since then I only see 5 to 10 animals along the same stretch of road. What man won’t fix, nature frequently does.


61 posted on 04/19/2007 3:05:39 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WhereTheBuffaloRoam; proud_yank; JB in Whitefish; Issaquahking

lol

That is very good.

“Welcome to Wyoming - now take a wolf and go home.”


62 posted on 04/19/2007 3:44:33 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

From most all evidence presently available, the only clear beneficiary of the wolf “reintroduction” programs turns out to be wolf program personnel.

We neither surprised nor amused.


63 posted on 04/19/2007 6:23:04 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
I just heard a report that scientists concerned with the honey bee decline are looking at the possibility of radiation related to cell phones and transmission towers or something like that may be diorienting the bees so they can’t get home again. Does anyone have more info on this?

I don't give the report any credibility. The "university" put a cell phone near a hive and bees "refused" to return. There are no controls. No replications of the "experiment". No investigation of possible alternatives. Until I see that level of professionalism and scientific method, I treat the "report" as a flim flam anecdote.

Let me add that I am a molecular biologist and radio engineer. I understand both sides of the issue. It's a weak correlation, no proof of causation and no explanation or theory offered to explain the observations.

64 posted on 04/21/2007 5:07:42 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: george76

The number of elk, which are wolves’ primary winter prey, has declined 50 percent in the area since 1995...


You can’t blame them. Elk are tasty!


65 posted on 04/21/2007 5:09:25 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Wolf packs also chase health adult animals and kill them.

66 posted on 04/21/2007 5:40:48 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Sorry. Colorado has lots of Aspen trees and not lots of wolves ( yet ).

Elk prefer to eat grass and not tree bark. We have been watching elk herds for many decades. Some one is misleading you about ‘tree eating elk.’

There are things that do kill Aspen trees, but elk are not eating whole forests of Aspen trees.

” I got the impression that there were a few areas where the aspen survived and are now regrowing since the wolves are discouraging the elk from eating them.”


67 posted on 04/21/2007 5:55:07 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: george76

The report I saw was not about elk eating all the aspen, but rather the aspen along the streams. This was causing erosion and damage to life in the stream, including the ever popular trout. Now they are not doing that and the fishing is supposed to have improved.


68 posted on 04/23/2007 9:39:49 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson