Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Amen! Jim has got the pitchfork and is cleaning out the stables.
I’m the sorriest thing you’ve ever seen. Just ask anyone who’s seen me.
That's the real question isn't it? I asked earlier on this thread so far without an answer: What makes anyone believe Rudy will even go for even one conservative for SCOTUS?
As for myself, I don't think he would go for any conservatives based upon his positions on abortion, gun control, gay marriage, etc. Those positions do not mesh with an "original constuctionist" interpretation of our Constitution.
Too true.
Too likely.
But I pray not.
No, I don’t and hope you never will..may God grant you and your family strength and courage. Forever a FreeRepublic.
I am sorry but I must admit that I ended up googling it. McConnell was on the tip of my tongue and it wouldn't come to me. I heard of Boehner before but it would have never come to me.
You are right. Good post.
Look again. She’s not here.
I prefer "nothing".
“No More Spam!”
That would pretty much knock out half of the Rudy detactors....plus at least Mia had cool graphics.
To me it looks like all you are doing is hoping Rudy will change from what he has been, a liberal. Heck, I know you have seen the info spiff,narses, flashbunny and others have posted.
Rudy's own words on abortion (taxpayer supported? Yeah, right)
Banning of guns.
Judge picks? Not when he thinks Ginsberg is an honest one.
Border issues? Made New York a sanctuary city for illegals. And so on. (do I really need to mention the homosexual agenda?) Only one issue, the WOT, he would be good on. The rest, he would work with the dims, to destroy this country. Not intentionally. Just with good intentions.
No...
NEVER!!!
One fine post Jim. Thank you.
I agree.
What would you call someone that thinks ILLEGALS have a Constitutional RIGHT to WELFARE?
If not socialist what warped classification do we put that under? Communist perhaps?
Bump.
placer
As active and large as the board is its still a micropscopic (and unrepresentative) portion of even just the Republican Party, much less the electorate as a whole.
= = =
Too true.
But more related to our level of motivation in various situations than to our numbers.
We seem to influence quite out of proportion to our numbers
WHEN
we feel it’s crucial.
Trouble is, we only seem to feel that way when it’s the 11th hour and 59th minute . . . and this election . . . that coiuld well be far too late.
Your seeming willingness to attempt to equate these things to conservatism is just another example of creeping socialism into our society.
No, because GWB supports some form of amnesty for illegal aliens does not make it conservative. And no, Dick Cheney’s undying love for his child does not make the gay agenda conservative. If you think it does, you’ve gone over the edge.
Crime going down and lower taxes in NYC are great, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, gun control, asset forfeiture, illegal alien sanctuaries, liberalism, socialism, etc, etc, etc.
If Rudy is nominated I still wouldn't want a democrat president. I think our greatest weakness is the lack of a true conservative majority in Congress. They would block a republican president's liberal indiscretions, just as they blocked Bush on illegals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.