Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How are todays' Democrats best categorized as socialists?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Posted on 04/22/2007 6:34:41 PM PDT by Miztiki

I'm reading about socialism on wikipedia and wondered how the Democrats of today would best be categorized. Are they social democrats? Reformist socialists? Moderates? Are they socialists according to definition of socialism at all?

Are they Marxists who see socialism as the "transition between capitalism and communism, the final stage of history"?

Do they only want a "welfare state"?

For instance, what is Hillary? What type of "ism" does she envision for our country?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
There's a good description of socialism on wikipedia, what it means, the different flavors, history of it, etc. if anyone wants to look it up. There are many other "isms" within the text that lead to more info too.
1 posted on 04/22/2007 6:34:45 PM PDT by Miztiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

The Democrat party of today is split between the old Roosevelt socialist lite folks and the new hard core leftists who embrace both socialiasm and marxism.

Many of them can not speak to either of the latter. They merely rant the feel good propaganda that both idealogies have made part and parcel in the quest to take America from within.


2 posted on 04/22/2007 6:37:34 PM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

They are all creeping totalitarians—some want to run and some would creep more slowly. But they are all heading to the same destination. Ideological details are unimportant. I don’t care about the fine differences between socialists, communists and national-socialists. They all hate God and they all want to engineer my life and my children’s lives into something abhorrent.


3 posted on 04/22/2007 6:38:22 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

4 posted on 04/22/2007 6:39:00 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

5 posted on 04/22/2007 6:40:27 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
There is no "me" in comrade Gore's Amerika.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
6 posted on 04/22/2007 6:41:29 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki
The Democrats have also combined socialism with a Nanny State mentality. While the old Socialists (not Communists) valued individual foibles the Democrats want cradle to grave control over our health, vices, beliefs, and dreams as well as where we live ("planned growth") and how much energy we use (the "global warming" scam). They have become self-appointed "benevolent dictators".

I think they see average people as mental patients and themselves as the guards.
7 posted on 04/22/2007 6:41:51 PM PDT by cgbg (Help! I am a prisoner in LKOT (Leftist Kook Occupied Territory.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Oh, that's good. That's very good. My compliments to whoever did that one.
8 posted on 04/22/2007 6:43:30 PM PDT by RichInOC ("Who are those guys?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Gosh you really illustrate so well in a personal way. It’s all bad and as you said.


9 posted on 04/22/2007 6:43:56 PM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki
"For instance, what is Hillary? What type of "ism" does she envision for our country?:

Despotism.

10 posted on 04/22/2007 6:44:26 PM PDT by flying Elvis ("In...War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst" Clausewitz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki
Commie, Pinko, Fascists.
11 posted on 04/22/2007 6:44:44 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

Fabian Socialists. Like the Fabian Society in the U.K., they’ve come to the conclusion that Marx and Engels were right, but that all that class warfare proletarian revolution language will never sell. Therefore, they’re out to achieve the ultimate goal of a socialist society, but by using the methods of Quintus Fabius Maximus Cunctator: stealth, patience, subversion, and harassment.


12 posted on 04/22/2007 6:44:57 PM PDT by Flatus I. Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

That one was one of mine done just this morning. Feel free to snag it if you wish.


13 posted on 04/22/2007 6:45:24 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki
Barack Obama is more of a Fabian Socialist. I’d have to categorize Hillary as more of a radical Marxist-socialist. Dennis Kucinich, probably more of a wacko-socialist. The others? I don’t know, probably socialists similar to those of Sweden and France.
14 posted on 04/22/2007 6:45:35 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

It varies. There are some who are old Roosevelt/Kennedy Democrats, strong on national defense and believe in socialism-lite, most of those seem to be from the southwest or Great Lakes region. Coastal Dems seem to tend more towards Social Democrats or out-and-out Socialists. I’ve met very very few true blue Communists who claim to be a member of anything but a fringe party.


15 posted on 04/22/2007 6:46:37 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

16 posted on 04/22/2007 6:47:52 PM PDT by The South Texan (The Drive By Media is America's worst enemy and American people don't know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera

Where does the term “Statist” fit into the socialist world?


17 posted on 04/22/2007 6:50:58 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Labrador Retrievers forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Miztiki

ANTI-AMERICA COMMUNISTS.....and that just covers the RAT Party “purists......the rest are just a bunch of stupid dolts.


18 posted on 04/22/2007 6:55:50 PM PDT by Howie66 (To the RAT Party: How can I question your patriotism? You have none, so what's your point?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

The Milwaukee socialists are very much into full blown surrender — both at home to illegal immigrants and abroad to the islamofascists. I don’t see a thread of national security values among the voting population or the elected officials on a local level here.

Oh, and handouts a plenty as well.


19 posted on 04/22/2007 6:56:30 PM PDT by sbMKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Thats the way I see the issue as well. You’re dead on.


20 posted on 04/22/2007 7:00:49 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson