Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems' Dead End
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 4/25/2007 | Investor's Business Daily

Posted on 04/25/2007 5:44:33 PM PDT by mdittmar

Iraq: The Democrat-led Congress will hand President Bush a bill that requires troop withdrawals to begin this fall. Bush has said he'll veto it. Good. Now it's time for the rest of the GOP to denounce this charade.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has said Bush is in a "state of denial" over the surge in Iraq. In fact, it's the Democrats who are in denial.

The $124 billion pork-filled bill was scheduled for a vote late Wednesday. Whenever it's passed, the bill they present Bush will be vetoed. Though it's possible they'll be able to override the veto, it's not likely. So what we have left is pure politics.

"On Iraq, the American people want a new direction, and we are providing it," said Sen. Patty Murray, the Washington Democrat and one of the lead congressional negotiators on the legislation.

She's right — they do have a new direction. It's called reverse. Or in military parlance, retreat. But what's truly amazing is that the Democrats can't understand just how bad they look right now.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: two
Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani made some rather tough, but completely deserved, comments about his political foes on Wednesday, saying "The Democrats do not understand the full nature and scope of the terrorist war against us."Amen to that.

But maybe those words weren't harsh enough.

Hunter calls for Reid to step down over 'war is lost' remarks

1 posted on 04/25/2007 5:44:34 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Dead end? I don’t know about that - its looking more like a Democratic victory if things play out as exepcted.

1. Democrats pass surrender/pork bill

2. President Bush vetos

3. Democrats get credit for “trying to bring the troops home” without the cost of successfully surrendering.

4. At the last minute the Democrats pass the bill again without the withdrawal date but with the pork.

5. The President signs the bill.

6. Democrats get their pork.


2 posted on 04/25/2007 5:49:49 PM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

We shall see.


3 posted on 04/25/2007 5:53:42 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

>>We shall see.<<

This is one of those times I’d like to be wrong.


4 posted on 04/25/2007 5:56:42 PM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Sounds like 2 veto’s to me.....Or at least it should. They have jumped the shark, now it is time to go on the offensive. Not only on the war but on spending.


5 posted on 04/25/2007 5:57:20 PM PDT by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

>>Sounds like 2 veto’s to me.....Or at least it should. They have jumped the shark, now it is time to go on the offensive. Not only on the war but on spending.<<

If they take out the troop withdrawal, fund the troops and leave in the pork it will be hard for the President to veto without the claim he is undercutting the troops himself.


6 posted on 04/25/2007 5:59:11 PM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

“jump the shark” ... cool! I looked up the meaning a few months ago on dictionary.com. You made perfect use of it and I hope you’re correct.


7 posted on 04/25/2007 6:03:34 PM PDT by frposty (Health care 'crisis')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Great editorial. Hooray Duncan Hunter for calling out Harry POS Reid!


8 posted on 04/25/2007 6:06:55 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
You are probably right, sad to say. If it was Ronaldus Maximus he would use the bully pulpit to see the the pork disappear. At the end of the day they all want to bring home the bacon, they just don’t care that it’s our own pig they are sending to the butcher....
9 posted on 04/25/2007 6:07:20 PM PDT by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I would never wish for the troops to be denied the resources they need, and I hope a clean bill reaches Bushs desk quickly. But a small part of me does wish the Dims continue to fight this issue long after Bushs veto. The longer this drags out, the more the American people will realize what a catastrophe is is to have them running the country and, God willing, will keep a Democrat out of the White House in 08.


10 posted on 04/25/2007 6:17:42 PM PDT by wingsof liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

“Dead end? I don’t know about that - its looking more like a Democratic victory if things play out as exepcted.

1. Democrats pass surrender/pork bill

2. President Bush vetos

3. Democrats get credit for “trying to bring the troops home” without the cost of successfully surrendering.

4. At the last minute the Democrats pass the bill again without the withdrawal date but with the pork.

5. The President signs the bill.

6. Democrats get their pork.”

Yeah but let’s remember this is about America winning and not cutting and running until Iraq can stand on it’s own. And hopefully in between we can give Iran a bloody nose so they think twice about sticking their nose in this fray and killing our troops. The Dems can have their pork, the weasels in Washington always find a way to that one way or the other.


11 posted on 04/25/2007 6:18:21 PM PDT by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I was more optimistic about the traitors getting some sense of patriotism just for one second and send a new bill after the President veto that does not have a surrender date but I am less optimistic now. I do not think the traitors will back off on this issue. Something very dramatic must happen to make them stop their treason, something very dramatic.


12 posted on 04/25/2007 6:22:07 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

“Sounds like 2 veto’s to me.....Or at least it should. They have jumped the shark, now it is time to go on the offensive. Not only on the war but on spending.”

Who is to go on the offensive? The Republicans? Don’t think so ... they are all hiding in the tall grass wetting their diapers. Like my useless senator Sununu from NH. The idiot thinks siding with the dems calling for resignations of the AG and such will get him reelected in 2008.

Looking at the way things are going, the dems will have a field day in 2008 and the majority of the people in America (notice how I don’t say Americans) want the war over any way possible ... they DON’T CARE ANYMORE!!!


13 posted on 04/25/2007 6:35:34 PM PDT by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you! (MaDeuce = John Browning's gift to freedom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I wish the headline had stopped after the second word.


14 posted on 04/25/2007 7:00:40 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

Funny!


15 posted on 04/25/2007 9:51:15 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Though it's possible they'll be able to override the veto, it's not likely. So what we have left is pure politics.

Can someone explain to me how, in the REAL WORLD, the Surrender Monkey Democrats are going to get 2/3 of the House to vote for the white flag??????????????????

16 posted on 04/26/2007 1:57:01 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson