For years I collected every news story/example of the homosexual agenda being promoted to little kids in schools. I still have hundreds of examples in bulging file folders.
My intention was to write a book exposing their deliberate effort to influence children. I finally gave up. I just couldn’t take it any more.
Now I have two little girls of my own and my wife and I will likely be unable to send them to private school due to our current financial situation.
I never understood the homosexual argument. Just because you like to have sex a certain way, why does that qualify you for special status?
Why does the way you like to have sex mean that we should redefine marriage? Marriage is not defined by this position or that position, or this way or that way.
Homosexuals have exactly the same “rights” as heterosexuals do today. States “license” marriage. A homosexual man can get a license to marry a woman and so can a heterosexual man in any state.
The same “rights” apply. The way you have sex is irrelevant to the definition of marriage.
“I never understood the homosexual argument. Just because you like to have sex a certain way, why does that qualify you for special status? Why does the way you like to have sex mean that we should redefine marriage? Marriage is not defined by this position or that position, or this way or that way.”
I’ll attempt to explain. The homosexual agenda has little to do with homosexuality per se. It’s really more of a stalking horse for a wider socialist and/or marxist agenda.
Socialism and it’s twisted sister, marxism, suffer from a very basic contradiction in terms. The worker/servant class that marxism and socialism seeks establish has to come from someplace. Socialist societies can use force to do a lot of things, but they haven’t figured out a good way to force the worker/servant class to breed children when they don’t want to. Socialism and marxism seek as their ultimate goal the reliance on the state for *all* things. And the irony is that socialist and marxist societies have had to rely on the family unit to produce the children it needs to secure it’s future. That family unit is by it’s nature both a religious and philosophically conservative construct.
I depart from the conservative reservation in that I don’t believe that the U.S. military buildup of the 1980’s was the primary reason behind the breakup of the soviet union and the marxist dictatorships of eastern europe. I think that was a contributing factor, but not the primary reason. I believe it was a far simpler problem: the birthrates in these marxist “utopias” had crashed. The worker/servant class simply stopped having kids. You can’t have a socialist/marxist utopia in the long run without a constant supply workers/servants. You also need a constant supply of young idealogues to wield the whip. But they simply weren’t being born.
In the long term socialism and marxism have to separate procreation from the family unit in order to triumph. By making procreation a purely biological act occuring outside the context of marriage, socialism and marxism can better secure a reliable supply of workers/servants as well as idealogues.
The homosexual agenda then needs to be seen in the context of the constant chipping away at the traditional family unit. By teaching children that homosexuality is normal, you help to separate sexuality from the context of traditional marriage. It’s an attempt to shift the paradigm so that it’s no longer seen as being necessary to get married.
I know just how you feel about being unable to get your kids out of the public schools for financial reasons. I am a public school teacher and mother who can’t quit and homeschool because of major family medical problems. We can’t afford to lose the health insurance.
However I wanted to reassure you that as a conservative it is possible to counteract the propaganda with your child. My daughter is very diligent in reporting to me when her teachers spout liberal talking points like “99% of Muslims are peaceful”, “We must save the Earth from global warming” , “Homosexuality is normal”, etc. Then we discuss the real facts and why people spread misinformation. She is only twelve, but she is quite able to discern when her teachers are making political statements rather than teaching. There is hope for the conservative children (and teachers) stuck in public schools!