Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Madam Story Keeps Mum on Clientele '20/20'Declines to Identify Those Not Already Known
Washington Post ^ | May 5, 2007 | Howard Kurtz

Posted on 05/04/2007 9:25:12 PM PDT by Cinnamon

During several weeks of calls to possible clients of the woman dubbed the D.C. Madam, Brian Ross of ABC confirmed that some fairly important people had used her escort service. But when he put together last night's segment for "20/20," the network's chief investigative reporter decided against outing anyone beyond the two people who already had been identified. "They just weren't newsworthy enough," ABC's Brian Ross said of the names. (By Donna Svennevik -- Abc)

"Their names won't mean anything to our audience," Ross said in an interview. "They just weren't newsworthy enough." Instead, he said, "what we really wanted to do is demonstrate the range of official Washington" involved with the escort service. Their positions, as described by Ross, made them important, at least by the capital's standards: A federal prosecutor, who recently died. A handful of military officers, including the head of an Air Force intelligence squadron. A senior official at the World Bank and other officials at

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: choke; dcmadam; escort; madam; prostitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: pillut48

You raise a good point. If there were ANY substantial Republicans on the list, these would have been disclosed imediately. So far, all they got was a low level State dept hack. Probably more than a few prominent Democrats there.


41 posted on 05/04/2007 10:09:36 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon
I watched 20-20 tonight. They said there were NO politicians on the list. No Republicans and no DemonRATS. Riiiiiight!!! She said she will "take all of them down with her." I'm wondering who she could "take down" that would be of any concern to any of us except well known politicians? They also said she was in prison for 18 months once before for "pimping." Isn't that kinda, sorta the same thing? LOL!
42 posted on 05/04/2007 10:13:22 PM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree

Strangely, the list only included janitors and professional Mimes. Who would have thunk it?


43 posted on 05/04/2007 10:17:35 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Pfffft. I’ve actually been to Nassua, about the same time.

I have motive....50 million of them.

Opportunity....I was in Nassua in 2005.

Plus, I um er ah, loved her, or something to that effect, that’s not really important.

All you have is a dream!


44 posted on 05/04/2007 10:17:57 PM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon
IMO it's pretty clear ABC simply came up blank in its hunt for conservatives on the list.

Let's look at what ABC and Howie Kurtz are telling us.

First, that ABC was able to identify about 1,000 people on her list.

The underlings at ABC undoubtedly identified the 20-30 names they thought would be most embarrasing to conservatives and gave those names to Ross for him personally to call.

The following was probably their best hope for finding a "family values" conservative hypocrite to put on the air:

"One guy swore to me up and down it couldn't have been him, he loves his wife," Ross said. The man, a well-known member of a conservative think tank, was right: Palfrey, Ross said, had repeatedly misdialed his number by confusing the 202 and 301 area codes.

But they came up empty with that one! The other 20-30 must have been real duds.

So all they really had was that poor Deputy Secretary of State whose job was to deal with the international aid crowd which is probably how he got caught up in this.

Their last gasp I would guess was to go after military officers, who after all often turn out to be conservative. But out of 1,000 clients they identified, there was only a "handful" of military officers (although that was enough for ABC to single them out as a group), and it seems only one poor Lt. Cdr. worth targeting, and ABC backed down on that.

So it's just a bunch of international aid bureaucrats and lobbyists. Gee, I wonder if ABC feels dirty and disgusting after their "encounter" with Ms. Palfrey?

45 posted on 05/04/2007 10:18:39 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
Scrub. Scrub. Scrub. Scrub. Clean. Clean. Clean. Clean. Scrub. Scrub. Scrub. Scrub. Clean. Clean. Clean. Clean.

Well lookie here! Nothing to see here at all!

46 posted on 05/04/2007 10:21:40 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
ABC choked big time. Couldn’t take the heat.

Yup. I bet the list has one Democrat bigfoot after another after another.

Ted Kennedy is probably the first name on it, while (for the most part) our guys are "dry, sober, and home with their wives."

-ccm

47 posted on 05/04/2007 10:31:42 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Cinnamon
"Their names won't mean anything to our audience," Ross said in an interview.

I guess that leaves out Oprah Winfrey and Paris Hilton.

49 posted on 05/04/2007 11:32:30 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (NBC News - the preferred network of assassins and terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

I was shocked by the gun control segment on this same 20-20 show. They actually took the position that gun control does not work. Amazing!


50 posted on 05/04/2007 11:43:07 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon

One step forward. How nice to have a conservative planted in with the liberal media.


51 posted on 05/05/2007 12:16:25 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree; SirJohnBarleycorn
If she wants to "take them down with her" perhaps it begins to dawn on her that ABC is part of "them." If she comes to this conclusion, the list might end up being released to a LOT of people. ABC was handed the keys to a major story, and like Howard Fineman of Newsweek with the Monica Lewinsky story, they punted.

Here is the major point ABC has missed though, and most likely deliberately. This is but one escort service of about 136 operating in the Washington D.C. area, and the clients are people in Government, and some of the providers are also in Government. This one service has been operating since about 1993. Take those numbers generated since 1993, combine them with the other escort services, and you get a picture of a huge number of people in and around Government who are being escorts or clients.

This, once again, illustrated profoundly the adage that the laws are for the little people. Washington D.C. has passed any number of laws and instigated programs to fight prostitution, yet people in Washington D.C. are major violators, but they are untouchable. The law simply doesn't apply to them.

52 posted on 05/05/2007 5:03:00 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat
"Hillary?"

No chance, the workers were all girls.

53 posted on 05/05/2007 5:14:52 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: furquhart
"But, really, do senior politicians have any need of escorts?"

As Rush said, they don't pay for the sex. They pay for them to leave when its over.

54 posted on 05/05/2007 5:20:06 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

I think the madam has had her 15 minutes of fame ...yawns..time to go


55 posted on 05/05/2007 5:21:36 AM PDT by donnab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

Newsworthy enough = “we could not really destroy their lives enough.”

NOTE FOR FUTURE: If you want to destroy someone’s life just “borrow” their cell and call an escort service. Perhaps multiple times and just hang up.

The IMPLICATION will destroy them.

ABC is sick. I bet they KNEW they could not report the names other than for those who confessed without serious liability. So they claim to be spilling the names and then pulled back to get the ratings but without the liability.


56 posted on 05/05/2007 5:23:47 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

From the end of the article:

There may be another shoe yet to drop. ABC did not push to obtain Palfrey's earlier phone records, which cover a nine-year period. But Ross said she has given them to three journalists investigating the Clinton administration.

Interesting.
But not surprising.
57 posted on 05/05/2007 5:30:50 AM PDT by Bratch (“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
I think they wanted to release the R's on the list but knew if they only released them, people would be demanding the release of the whole list.

I also wonder just how many reporters were on her list.

58 posted on 05/05/2007 5:34:05 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Yup. I bet the list has one Democrat bigfoot after another after another.

Ted Kennedy is probably the first name on it

LOL wouldn't it be something if his partner in the waitress sandwich, and current DEMOCRATIC candidate for President , Chris Dodd was also on the list.

59 posted on 05/05/2007 5:37:17 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

So THAT is where the Budget surplus went!


60 posted on 05/05/2007 5:38:18 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson