Bush OKs 'integration' with European Union

WorldNetdaily.com ^ | May 8, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Mase]

Looks like Corsi is vying to achieve Paul Craig Roberts status. Although he's taking moonbattery to a new level here, he still has his work cut out for him if he really wants to be like Paul.

When he starts adding his middle name to his articles, such as they are, then we'll know he's serious about attaining this goal.

[1rudeboy]

I wonder how many "tribunals and secretariats" this will call for. How much unAmerican crap do we have to pay for now?

I know but I can't tell you. It's a secret. And it's hard enough to keep a lid on things with Corsi snooping around.

[Toddsterpatriot]

He neglected to mention why his acolytes need to be alarmed.

Trading is bad. Trading with foreigners is bad. Foreigners are bad. I think I covered the high points for his "readers".

[1rudeboy]

I suppose we’ll have to wait for the conspiracy-mongering until after Corsi submits his FOIA request, and Commerce drags it feet. Until he gets the documents he requested, and flushes everything down the memory-hole because there’s nothing there . . . .

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did he stop writing about the border agents?

[wolfcreek]

“This has happened 100s of times before”

Globalization has been in progress since before the 1500s. The French, the Spanish, the Dutch, the English and the good ‘ol USA have spread their influence all around the world in an attempt to create their very own NWO. They all failed. Those who attempt this now will do the same.

[Czar]

"We knew this (NWO)was coming."

No doubt from the same crowd of traitors trying to end run the Constitution with SPP/NAU, another Globalist/NWO wet dream currently running into obstacles--a lot of them.

[kellynla]

Bump for later

[hedgetrimmer]

Nothing of any use to add to the conversation, as usual.

[hedgetrimmer]

I don’t jump on the latest bandwagon brought by either the left or the right

Globalism isn't a left or right issue, because both sides are selling this country out.

[ExtremeUnction]

If there is any deluded soul that still thinks Bush is or ever was a conservative this should put that idea to rest.

Bush is neither. He is a "Free Trader", as was Clinton, Bush Sr. and dozens more before him going back centuries. His signing this agreement has nothing to do with politics. It's all about money.

[ExtremeUnction]

If there is any deluded soul that still thinks Bush is or ever was a conservative this should put that idea to rest.

Bush is neither. He is a "Free Trader", as was Clinton, Bush Sr. and dozens more before him going back centuries. His signing this agreement has nothing to do with politics. It's all about money.

[hedgetrimmer]

he’d never stood up to the UN, EU and a multitude of cryptosocilaist organizations

LOLOLOL! Bush stand up to the UN? That's really funny when you consider that his wife and his daughters WORK for the UN!

You don't see a conflict of interest there? I do. In fact I see corruption there, as these people toss away the interests of their countrymen and their duty to this country as citizens for the globalist salaries they collect.

[hedgetrimmer]

That’s the truth. And his latest edict to force ethanol into our gasoline supply is nothing but a way to line his brother Jeb’s pocket.

[Toddsterpatriot]

So why is more trade with Europe a bad thing?

[gondramB]

>>Bush is neither. He is a “Free Trader”, as was Clinton, Bush Sr. and dozens more before him going back centuries. His signing this agreement has nothing to do with politics. It’s all about money.<<

Don’t forget Ronald Reagan. Less government regulation of business, including trade is the conservative position.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Less government regulation of business, including trade is the conservative position.

But little hedgie says less government interference will lead to socialism.

[Killborn]

No, you’ve already lost and your statement proves it. Protectionism and isolationism is simply impossible in this day and age. If we don’t take our fight abroad, then our enemies will. Nature abhors a vaccuum. You remind me of a cartoon I saw, a bunch of guys are going out protesting globalization and of course they are using all the latest Japanese electronics and imported products.

The previous globalization efforts you cited are an attempt at subjugation and conquest. This globalization is the unavoidable confluence of historical, technological, and ecopnomic advancements and revolutions, not the policy of the US or any other nation/organization. World War II, Cold War, and the WoT is proof that America can not afford to shy away from the world stage and must take charge. “Fortress America” died when Japan came knocking.

[Killborn]

“LOLOLOL! Bush stand up to the UN? That’s really funny when you consider that his wife and his daughters WORK for the UN!”

Oooohh, managing and advocating education initiatives is such a grave threat to American soveriegnty that they SURELY must be traitors! Because education initiatives are more indicative of American sovereignty than, say, going into Iraq despite the UN’s collective disapproval, refusing to adopt the Kyoto protocols, standing up for Israel when few nations would.

Just color us blue and sing the Internationale!

[Killborn]

Because the only people who care about American sovereignty are those who wants no external trade, abrogate all treaties with all nations, and seal of America from the rest of the world.

Got it.