Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pennsylvania Court Orders Sperm Donor to Lesbian Couple to Pay Child Support
FoxNews.com ^ | Wednesday, May 9, 2007 | AP

Posted on 05/12/2007 3:57:30 AM PDT by jsh3180

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania — A sperm donor who helped a lesbian couple conceive two children is liable for child support under a state appellate court ruling that a legal expert believes might be the first of its kind in the U.S.

A Superior Court panel last week ordered a Dauphin County judge to establish how much Carl L. Frampton Jr. would have to pay to the birth mother of the 8-year-old boy and 7-year-old girl.

"I'm unaware of any other state appellate court that has found that a child has, simultaneously, three adults who are financially obligated to the child's support and are also entitled to visitation," said New York Law School professor Arthur S. Leonard, an expert on sexuality and the law.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; homosexualagenda; wtffile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
"Women uh.....sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh do not avoid women, Mandrake. But I do deny them my essence."

General Jack D. Ripper (from Dr. Strangelove).

This sperm donor should have heeded the immortal words of General Ripper!!

1 posted on 05/12/2007 3:57:36 AM PDT by jsh3180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

No good deed goes unpunished


2 posted on 05/12/2007 3:59:51 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

Sounds like he was a bit involved in the lives of the children, but nevertheless the whole article makes me think being a donor is NOT a good idea. Sounds like pesky lawyers and our gay intifada in this country is pushing to make life miserable if you even look at them lone enough help them bring a child into this world.


3 posted on 05/12/2007 4:05:33 AM PDT by commonguymd (Move it to the right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
I don't know if I'd call it a "good deed." He was their friend and knew they were lesbians who wanted to raise a family. He wasn't just an anonymous sperm donor.

The process was very informal — Jacob was inseminated at home.

4 posted on 05/12/2007 4:06:21 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

Although I sit back and humorously say to myself, this guy had it coming, I cant help but think of how men get screwed every day in domestic courts. Women go into child custody and child support hearings and they are holding 4 aces against against a man’s pair. This is a great extension of that,but it does go to show how DAMNED a man is in child support and custody cases.

Women who commit adultery and run off with another man taking the kids with them practically always get custody and child support. Even though the man is left at home with House payments, car payments,lawyers fees, bills for the home to be paid with his paycheck, while the woman who took off is living off another mans check and has hers to add to it so they live high on the hog.

Sorry about that rant but I am watching my son get screwed over by a pig that isnt fit to shine his shoes much less raise my Grandchildren.


5 posted on 05/12/2007 4:17:39 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

Has paternity been established?

There might be good reason to believe the doctor is also the ‘donor’.


6 posted on 05/12/2007 4:17:58 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

One ‘stroke’ too many for Mr. Frampton.


7 posted on 05/12/2007 4:24:23 AM PDT by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

Now why would you help a couple of liberal )y%^s conceive a child and not expect trouble. Stoopid.


8 posted on 05/12/2007 4:32:00 AM PDT by generalhammond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

Let’s get this right:

A dead man can owe a lesbian $1000 a month because he screwed her once or twice.

Boy, Vince Foster owes Hillary a whole lot of money......


9 posted on 05/12/2007 4:33:53 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180
I’ve wondered how long this would take to start.

Our child support system is for the benefit of the children not the adults.

So if what’s in the best interest of the child is supreme, the adults must pay, regardless of any legal agreement the adult came to prior to the exchange.

10 posted on 05/12/2007 4:38:21 AM PDT by live+let_live ("God is a mathematician with an eye for art.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I feel your pain. Most divorce attorneys will admit that the system is stacked against men from the start. Of course if there is video of the pig being a pig........;)


11 posted on 05/12/2007 5:06:59 AM PDT by DogBarkTree (The correct word isn't "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live
"Shultz-Jacob's lawyer, Heather Z. Reynosa, wants Frampton's support obligation to be made retroactive to when Jacob first filed for support. Frampton's Social Security survivor benefits may also help reduce Shultz-Jacob's monthly obligation."

Looks like they're going after deep pockets: Social Security survivor benefits.

12 posted on 05/12/2007 5:26:27 AM PDT by Smocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

He needs to file for custody of the children, then. That will get their attention for doing this.


13 posted on 05/12/2007 5:38:20 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smocker

I see...so he is no longer around...so he can’t file for custody.

This is all so strange - talk about disfunctional.


14 posted on 05/12/2007 5:41:32 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

You can almost smell the lawyers coming after his estate on behalf of the child. I do not know what he had but you can be sure it will be sought after by the lawyer for the child.


15 posted on 05/12/2007 6:02:06 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

Since child support payments are for the children, then the oourt should also require the custodial parent to document their usage FOR the child rather than using it for themselves.


16 posted on 05/12/2007 6:26:44 AM PDT by Carolinamom (God is pleased to get knee-mails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180
In other words, the court is sanctioning polygamy. After liberals swore it would never happen. "Big Love" comes to Pennslyvania.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 05/12/2007 6:31:07 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180
The situation is creepy, but I'm thinking some good may come of this ruling.

Maybe it will deter the whole "sperm donation to lesbian couple" business.

18 posted on 05/12/2007 6:58:46 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smocker

That’s what I was thinking. When I was in college, I knew a woman who had a illegitimate child and the child’s actual father had disappeared. She knew a man who was dying of a chronic disease, so she talked him into marrying her and claiming the child was his. When he died, about six months later, she and her child claimed the survivor benefits. I don’t know how this turned out, because this person was an acquaintance with whom I did not want to keep up. I do remember feeling sorry for the baby, bacause of the kind of “family” it had.


19 posted on 05/12/2007 7:03:44 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
Since child support payments are for the children, then the oourt should also require the custodial parent to document their usage FOR the child rather than using it for themselves.

It should also be taxable income. 

20 posted on 05/12/2007 10:26:55 AM PDT by zeugma (MS Vista has detected your mouse has moved, Cancel or Allow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson