Posted on 05/15/2007 10:02:17 AM PDT by William Tell 2
"I don't know what to do. Should I call someone or is that being racist?"
These were the words of a young Circuit City store clerk after seeing a video, made by the Fort Dix Six terrorists, of their firearms training.They are indicative of how indoctrinated Americans have become in the thoughts, attitudes, philosophy, and beliefs of politically correct liberalism. That this young man should even have to think twice about reporting possible terrorist activity is astounding – and dangerous.
Yet, it is an all too sad fact of American life. Liberals, aided by their political representatives, the leftwing of the Democratic Party, have made Americans so self-conscious about being careful not to be racist or even appear to think racist thoughts or to even think of possibly violating someone’s civil rights, that the average American might ignore evidence of a terrorist plot simply to avoid doing so.
It was in 2002 that I wrote a piece for Frontpagemag.com detailing the hysterical reaction by the civil libertarians to President Bush’s initiative called the Terrorist Information and Prevention System (TIPS). They described it as a program to enlist American citizens as auxiliary spies, or ask them to engage in counterintelligence.
However, all that TIPS was can be illustrated by what this Circuit City store clerk did. The TIPS program was merely a procedure for people to report suspicious activity that might be terrorist related.
This did not prevent people like NBC’s Chris Matthews vehemently condemning TIPS then. He made the usual fallacious trite allegations that TIPS was analogous to a secret police and/or fascism. At the time, I wrote that the irony of Matthews’ sophistry was that he echoed the opinions of totalitarian acolytes such as the World Socialist Web Site and the People’s Weekly World. These groups, as well as the ACLU, the National Lawyers Guild, and the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee all condemned the TIPS program. They all felt, as Matthews did, that TIPS was more of a danger than terrorists.
They mischaracterized the TIPS program as citizens spying on one another rather than citizens reporting suspicious behavior. They portrayed TIPS as if it involved warrantless searches of property and midnight arrests of people.
Mischaracterizing Bush’s anti-terrorism programs, such as TIPS, the PATRIOT Act, and the Terrorist Surveillance Program has become a cottage industry for these fanatics since September 11th. They seem more inclined to spread panic and fear among the American people against President Bush than they do against Muslim terrorists. Furthermore, organizations like these have little or no credibility. They have a track record of saying the guilty were innocent. The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) and the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee (a splinter group of the ACLU) represented the Rosenbergs. ACLU co-founder, Felix Frankfurter was a character witness for Hiss.
Information obtained from Soviet archives after the dissolution of the Soviet Union proved they were traitors. These civil libertarians were completely incorrect about their assertions that they were innocents whose civil liberties were violated.
The Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) issued a 2003 report on Hate Crimes and Discrimination Against Arab Americans which expressed their concern about TIPS. It stated, “...there is every reason to be concerned that any such program is likely to degenerate into a vehicle for systematizing the worst forms of prejudice.”
Yet, Hussein Ibish, the ADC communications director (and editor of the 2003 report), wrote a June 2000 essay condemning the report of the National Commission on Terrorism. He said, “Our civil liberties and core principles of American democracy are in peril. If the recommendations of the National Commission on Terrorism are implemented, you can kiss goodbye some of your constitutional protection....The commission, appointed by Congress …calls for the federal government to place more wiretaps on Americans...encourage the CIA to employ known criminals and terrorists and institute a vast surveillance system for tracking foreign students....it concentrates on international terrorist attacks conducted inside the United States and exaggerates the risk of such attacks.... these radical steps would significantly damage civil liberties in the United States.”
This attitude is so pervasive it would be misleading to say that only leftwing journalists or groups opposed TIPS. Business Week (BW) wrote about TIPS July 25, 2002. What they said then seems silly given the Fort Dix incident. BW said, “Operation TIPS will more than likely reduce privacy without increasing security. Let's be real: Terrorists with half a brain aren't likely to be outsmarted by the mailman or open the door to have the gas meter read if they have bomb-making material nearby.”
I guess Business Week also thinks terrorists would not be stupid enough to make a video of their training and give it to a clerk to transcribe to DVD either, yet they did.
This paranoia about civil liberties was even used to justify a policy of The American Library Association (ALA). The ALA issued a statement claiming that it, “considers that sections of the USA PATRIOT ACT are a present danger to the constitutional rights and privacy rights of library users.”
Who elected or appointed the ALA has sentinels of American civil liberties? Are they going to be responsible if their violation of the law results in the deaths of innocent people from terrorism?
Unfortunately, our government has been convinced to dilute its anti-terrorism policies because of the prevalence of this propaganda. Even more unfortunate is the fact that ordinary citizens are made to feel they are racist if they suspect an Arab-American or a Muslim of terrorist activity.
Fortunately, for the soldiers and civilians at Fort Dix, NJ and for all Americans actually, a store clerk at Circuit City was not totally intimidated by the politically correct liberal thought police.
(When I wrote my novel "A Sense of Duty" one of things I wanted to express was the pervasiveness of liberalism in the politics and culture - even among conservatives. My novel was prescient to say the least.)
Liberalism is DANGEROUS?
First I had heard of that.
But they are such LOVABLE people. Just think of all the warm thoughts they direct at George W. Bush alone. And they are COMPASSIONATE, doesn’t that count for anything?
Of course, the fact they are total simpletons and have to be led to the washroom, so they don’t pee in the plants, may well be the deciding factors here.
In the real world people make judgments all the time, and these folks walked in with a videotape that showed some disturbing things.
This is one more reason why political correctness should be rejected out of hand, and good willed common sense should replace that protmoronic concept.
Most Americans would have walked to safety if necessary, in order to get out of harms way. After all, most of us were taught to come in out of the rain when we were still children!
At least N.O. is still a chocolate city, no whites need apply!
< /liberal dolt >
“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt.”
— John Philpot Curran
Liberalism is dangerous...and it’s a Mental Disorder.
I’m actually most amazed (and thankful) that the young man wasn’t ignored when he called whomever he called....
Liberalism is a disease!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.