1 posted on
05/16/2007 8:31:29 AM PDT by
Kuksool
To: Kuksool
The difference between Edwards and Giuliani is that Edwards is a good husband unlike Rudy with his ex-wives.
2 posted on
05/16/2007 8:32:55 AM PDT by
Kuksool
To: Kuksool
Rudy isn’t going to get the nomination so the question is moot.
3 posted on
05/16/2007 8:34:09 AM PDT by
madison10
To: Kuksool
Y.A.M.P. ALERT!!!!
(Yet Another Meaningless Poll)
5 posted on
05/16/2007 8:36:07 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
To: Kuksool
LOL... crash & burn Rooty... crash & burn.
6 posted on
05/16/2007 8:36:50 AM PDT by
johnny7
("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
To: Kuksool
Edwards would be tough because he’d almost certainly take NC and would probably take VA as well.
8 posted on
05/16/2007 8:37:38 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
To: Kuksool
Just shows people are stupid.
9 posted on
05/16/2007 8:38:21 AM PDT by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: Kuksool
Rassmussen is laughable.
I am no fan of Rudy, but a “feathery prince” like edwards beating RG has about as strong a chance as a flea fart in a hurricane!
11 posted on
05/16/2007 8:39:32 AM PDT by
Mr. Jazzy
(Very Proud Dad of LCpl Smoothguy242 USMC of 1/3 Marines, now fighting for freedom, on duty in Iraq.)
To: Kuksool
Well, if that an accurate depiction of things, the numbers should look like this if Fred runs:
Pink Poney: 38%
Fred Thompson: 57%
12 posted on
05/16/2007 8:41:00 AM PDT by
roaddog727
(BullS##t does not get bridges built)
To: Kuksool
These polls over a year and half out are so meaningless it is mind boggling....regardless of who these silly polls says is winning....regarding a fake race that isn’t happening...
To: Kuksool
It boggles the mind that either of these assclowns are actually being taken seriously for the job of POTUS.
17 posted on
05/16/2007 8:48:00 AM PDT by
Recovering Hermit
(There's another old saying Senator..."Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.")
To: Kuksool
WHAT A COUNTRY!!!
20 posted on
05/16/2007 8:57:01 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: Kuksool
Okay.
I hereby resolve:
Not to read any polls about election favorites for at least six months.
Not to read any articles about Guiliani.
and to pray that people stop posting articles about horrible cruelty to animals.
26 posted on
05/16/2007 9:04:08 AM PDT by
altura
To: neverdem; Howlin
This is a bit wierd .....
What did they do “force” a decision between two (carefully) chosen candidates to “bump” Edwards chances (while knocking repubbies)?????
NOTHING anywhere shows Edwards has any chance of anything but mopping up the floor after Hillary drools on it ...
34 posted on
05/16/2007 9:31:20 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Kuksool
I believe Edwards would be worst than Hillary
36 posted on
05/16/2007 9:33:15 AM PDT by
Gone_Postal
(Communism works only in Heaven, where they don’t need it, and in Hell, where they’ve already got)
To: Kuksool
As I've said before and will undoubtedly say again:
The Democrats have a historic opportunity to nominate a woman, a black or a Hispanic this time around. After much soul-searching and wearing of hearts on sleeves, I believe the Democrats will nominate a white guy from the South. That's what worked the last time.
So it's going to be Edwards or Gore. ("His" movie won an Oscar and he's up for a Nobel Peace Prize. That kind of publicity could push him into the race.)
42 posted on
05/16/2007 9:57:16 AM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson