Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HUNTER EXPRESSES “FIERCE DISAPPOINTMENT” OVER SENATE AMNESTY PROPOSAL
GoHunter08.com ^ | 5/18/07 | Duncan Hunter

Posted on 05/18/2007 6:44:16 AM PDT by pissant

I vow to oppose this legislation supported by Senators Edward Kennedy and John McCain.It provides a vast new immigration benefit to millions of illegal aliens who have broken our laws to live in the United States.I opposed the 1986 amnesty act because of this same reason.It proved to be the draw that we predicted it would be.I am deeply disappointed to see history repeating itself.

This package will confirm to the world that the U.S. does not really mean what it says when it comes to immigration enforcement.As a result of the citizenship benefit included in this legislation, despite the fine print, we will see a stampede across our borders.

This vast new amnesty and expansive guest worker program will surely be ridden with fraud and abuse, and ultimately lead to millions of public-assistance-dependent immigrants.

The Senate’s decision to blatantly ignore the Secure Fence Act signed into law last year and only require construction of 370 miles of fence, as opposed to the 854 miles mandated by the law, is a dramatic failure of this legislation.The San Diego border fence has proven that fencing works.The time has come to quickly implement the Secure Fence Act, not retreat from its mandates.

I believe that this package will result in lower wages for America’s already-struggling families by encouraging the importation of cheap foreign labor rather than investing, developing and growing a domestic workforce that will sustain our economy far into the future.

Amnesty is not the answer.Border enforcement must be first and it must be comprehensive.To do otherwise is to repeat the mistakes of the past.This Senate bill is bad for Americans, bad for our workers, bad for law enforcement and, most importantly, bad for national security.I will fight it.Please join with me.

(Excerpt) Read more at gohunter08.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; duncanhunter; illegalimmigration; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: laweeks
If that piece-of-garbage legislation is not vetoed by Bush (even tho he sponsored it), then we conservative Republicans have no home in the party.

Bush has been wanting this for years. Once he started calling them "guest workers", it was clear that he figured he would be able to sign some sort of amnesty.

We’ve only built 2 miles of the 700 mile fence we were promised.

Big Business doesn't want it, Bush doesn't want it, the GOP doesn't want it. Back when Bush was Governor, he wanted us to be as close to Mexico as possible. I have a very strong feeling that that's the reason why we have dragged our feet on the wall.
21 posted on 05/18/2007 7:05:39 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Hunter news needs to continue to be posted and bumped to the top. The only way we americans have a chance is to blanket the Internet, talk radio, etc with news about Hunter and his stands - we must force the other media (and the american people) to start paying attention and stop giving air time and lip service to McCain, Rudy & Romney/


22 posted on 05/18/2007 7:06:27 AM PDT by wilco200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We really, really, really like Duncan Hunter. If he does not get the nomination and Fred does I hope Fred asks him to run as veep. What a combination. Fred for two terms then Hunter for two terms. That would straighten this country out especially if Congress is controlled by the Conservatives.


23 posted on 05/18/2007 7:12:44 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
This is every bit as bad as the first, Kennedy immigration bill in 1965. Then we had the toothless Simpson-Mazzoli Act in 1986. Get fooled once... shame on you. Get fooled twice... shame on me. Get fooled three times?!


24 posted on 05/18/2007 7:12:58 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Bravo, Duncan Hunter. We’re with you!


25 posted on 05/18/2007 7:18:03 AM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This amnesty proposal is an outrage.


26 posted on 05/18/2007 7:19:13 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoanneSD

BUMP


27 posted on 05/18/2007 7:19:37 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Reasons for allowing illegal immigrants to have citizenship:

1) They put money into the Social Security system that the politicians know the immigrants can’t collect on (not yet), so it’s more money to play with.

2) The money that they’re putting in the SS system, would’ve been put in there by the over 45,000,000 people we’ve aborted since 1973, so it’s a nice gift and allows the dramatic loss of goods/services/investments/lives that the abortions have cost us.

3) [and this is the most important one to both parties] They’ll illegally vote (as they’ve already been doing in Texas), and guess which party they’ll illegally vote for? Right! (Well, the RINOs hope that they’ll get a few illegal votes because, after all, they’re kinda’ going along too)

So, the illegal voters are doing only the Washington 535 + Bush people’s a favor, but not a favor to us, the little people.

I’m surprised that the unions haven’t been squealing like stuck pigs on illegals 1) taking away work from potential members, and 2) from allowing the free market to raise the hourly rate for such work. Again, it’s the Washington mind versus the little people they represent.

Let us pray.


28 posted on 05/18/2007 7:20:37 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Mexicans are relatively wealthy compared to the rest of the world. There are 126 countries that have per capita incomes lower than Mexico's. If we are really letting all these people break our laws and flood our country because they are poor and only want a better life for their families, why not send them back and let some really poor people in to do the work that Americans won't do?

Why do Mexicans get blessed by virtue of their geography?

29 posted on 05/18/2007 7:22:00 AM PDT by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Outstanding post! BTTT!


30 posted on 05/18/2007 7:26:54 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

You got that right, baby.


31 posted on 05/18/2007 7:28:51 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Bump!!!!


32 posted on 05/18/2007 7:37:53 AM PDT by Gvl_M3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

And yet “conservatives” refuse to get behind this guy.


33 posted on 05/18/2007 7:38:43 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joylyn

>If we can secure the border in 18 months, why hasn’t it been done already?<

I have been writing the President about this for 6 1/2 years now, joylyn. It hasn’t been done because the President doesn’t WANT it done.


34 posted on 05/18/2007 7:45:02 AM PDT by Paperdoll (GO DUNCAN HUNTER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rob21

“..I would urge you to at least give some money to Hunter, just don’t give any to the RNC.”

Good idea. My husband and I stopped contributing to the RNC long ago, and give to individual PRO-LIFE, CONSERVATIVE candidates, like Hunter.


35 posted on 05/18/2007 7:56:04 AM PDT by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

How is it possible to be disappointed now when it has been known for months that this is what would come down to the country from the closed-door ‘bipartisan’ deals?


36 posted on 05/18/2007 7:58:10 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

I just wonder where all the outraged border-bots were in November of 2006 when it was time to support the courageous Republicans in the House of Representatives who actually fought the good fight on immigration reform? I remember a number of Freepers in particular who were adamant about staying home to “send a message to the GOP”.

Now you fault the spinless moderates in the GOP for caving when you are DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the fact that we have less GOP conservatives in the House and the Senate than we had before the election?

Pathetic.


37 posted on 05/18/2007 8:02:57 AM PDT by Deo et Patria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

At last, Hunter addresses the amnesty portion of the bill. His earlier TV/Radio appearances were directed towards the fence. Good comprehensive statement.


38 posted on 05/18/2007 8:03:04 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

He’s been making good comperhensive anti-amnesty statements for 26 years. Just ain’t always on the evening news.


39 posted on 05/18/2007 8:06:53 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Fierce Disappointment is a rather strange expression. "Rabid disinterest", "angry alternative preference", and "violent concern" come to mind as similar constructions.
40 posted on 05/18/2007 8:09:40 AM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson