Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethics of Marines a concern.
Associated Press ^ | May 17, 2007 | LOLITA C. BALDOR

Posted on 05/18/2007 8:26:36 PM PDT by dvan

Ethics of Marines a concern By , Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Marine Corps commandant is admonishing his officers to stress a need for ethics on the battlefield after a survey found Marines a bit more likely than soldiers to condone torture to gain information or save a comrade's life.

Gen. James T. Conway told Pentagon reporters Thursday that he wants to examine whether Marines are more prone to not follow military rules of engagement. He is telling his officers to make sure their Marines understand the importance of ethics in the fight.

"I was a little bit disturbed by what I saw because, one, Marines were more likely to do those things than were soldiers," he said. "I want to get after that because, again, those things are things that either incite the population or, conversely, help to win the fight if you do them right."

Ethics on the battlefield has been a persistent and troublesome issue for the military during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ethics; irag; marines; pc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Just what we need a "polically correct" Commandant! Where the hell is Patton when we need him? Damned glad I am not in the corps now. Used to be you fought wars to win not be popular with the enemy.

Imagine Patton today saying "We're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks"?

1 posted on 05/18/2007 8:26:40 PM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dvan

Wonderful. We all know that wars are won by whoever is nicest.


2 posted on 05/18/2007 8:29:27 PM PDT by TUAN_JIM (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
Oh brother, what a wus! With Gen. James T. Conway at the helm, we are sure to loose.
3 posted on 05/18/2007 8:30:24 PM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (I will respect illegal aliens “civil rights” when they respect the sovereignty of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
Used to be you fought wars to win not be popular with the enemy.

Unfortunately this is no longer true. Our "leaders" cannot even agree what a "war" is. How our our warriors supposed to understand that we train them for war but want them to act, not like warriors, but as diplomats. We have put them in an impossible position and if we do not want them to win we should pull them out and bring them home.

4 posted on 05/18/2007 8:33:42 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

I think the Special Ops guys will back me up when I say that if you don’t stay on top of guys they can get out of balance.

Special Operations troops sometimes even need to be reminded to tone it down a little.

In civilian life we see it with policemen and SWAT teams, sometimes the leadership needs to reign in the male impulse to become too pumped up.

Troops aren’t just rotated for their own benefit, it also serves to let them decompress a little bit, so that things don’t spin out of control.

The Marine Corp must maintain discipline among it’s troops.


5 posted on 05/18/2007 8:37:48 PM PDT by ansel12 ((America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TUAN_JIM

No, there are ethics in war.....

For example, do you want our soldiers killing all first born male babies and small children in a town to stop insurrection?

Of course not!

So there are ethics on the battlefield, now we are just discussing how and what...


6 posted on 05/18/2007 8:40:51 PM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dvan

"Imagine Patton today saying "We're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks"?"

WHY ARE YOU QUOTING PATTON,OLD TIMER?

AT 50,THAT FELT GOOD! SEMPER FI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


7 posted on 05/18/2007 8:42:21 PM PDT by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Hmmmmm....

Would I torture an illegal combatant in Iraq — to save the life of a fellow Marine?
In a New York minute!

How in hell did the Commandant expect his Marines to answer that question?
Uh, No Sir — I’d have tea with the bastard while his buddies were torturing or killing our buddy.

This Commandant, the Congress and our President should NOT send Marines on social neighborhood welcome wagon missions....
Marines should ONLY be sent to break things and kill people who are defending those things or places....

After their mission is accomplished, they can play nice nice with the docile survivors — if there are any.


8 posted on 05/18/2007 8:43:04 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
>>>...a survey found Marines a bit more likely than soldiers to condone torture to gain information or save a comrade's life.<<<

Give 'em a medal!! Make torture for information to save a comrade's life a badge of honor. If it's just to "gain information", probably merits only a couple of "atta-boys"!

9 posted on 05/18/2007 8:43:08 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

This prick isn’t fit to wipe the butt of the lowliest private.


10 posted on 05/18/2007 8:43:54 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

My father (WWII China Marine) is spinning in his grave.


11 posted on 05/18/2007 8:45:41 PM PDT by tgslTakoma (BS: Now THAT'S Activism, baby !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Conway is a pampered prince, he’s no Marine and he’s damned sure no commandant.

Where’s Uncle Al when we need him. Geezus

MARINES LOOK AFTER THEIR OWN GENERAL! OR DIDN’T THEY TEACH YOU THAT IN THE PRICK FACTORY?


12 posted on 05/18/2007 8:49:02 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Our Forefathers roared for Liberty, their children now whine for security and safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
Has the Commandant lost his mind?! Ethics in war dear General are about winning. My Dad is a Marine, and I'd strip the flesh off anyone if it would save his life, or get me information to save a squads lives. God save us. They want the Marines to 'play nice' now. Jesus wept.
13 posted on 05/18/2007 8:51:33 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Gen. James T. Conway,
It appears that you have become politically correct, a necessity in dealing with the DC media. If you are having difficulty sleeping at night because of all the death and destruction that Marines are causing in Iraq:

Have a couple of good stiff drinks before bedtime. Or

Talk to your Doctor and ask that she prescribe you with some sleeping pills. Or

Quit thinking of words such as ‘gentle’, ‘appeasement’, ‘soft’, ‘kind’, ‘mushy’, ‘sweet’, and bring forth phrases into your vocabulary such as ‘git ‘er done’, blood and guts’, ‘rip him a new one’, ‘ripped from one end to the other’, shocked the snot out of ‘em’, and so forth. Or

Get out of the way and let a stronger minded man who is commited to winning do the job.


14 posted on 05/18/2007 8:51:42 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Here’s this guys bio
http://www.jcs.mil/bios/bio_conway.html


15 posted on 05/18/2007 8:55:25 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

Ethics are fine as long as we remember that we’re fighting against the scum of the earth.


16 posted on 05/18/2007 8:57:55 PM PDT by peeps36 (OUTLAWED WORDS--INSURGENT,GLOBAL WARMING,UNDOCUMENTED WORKER,PALESTINIAN,TERMINATED PREGNANCY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Has THIS really become the Preferred way to conquer your enemy?

We’re NOW going to try and Kill Them with Kindness ???

God Help Us.


17 posted on 05/18/2007 9:02:07 PM PDT by austinmark ("May the Flea's of a Thousand Camels Nest in ALLAH's Pubic Hair" !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
For example, do you want our soldiers killing all first born male babies and small children in a town to stop insurrection?

How about firebombing civilian populations causing tens of thousands of casualties among women and children in order to hasten the end to a war. How about using atomic bombs on civilian populations causing hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties including thousands of children all in order to bring a war to a more rapid close.

I'm not against any of these decisions, but we should remember that when our backs were against the wall we used all means available to achieve victory. The ethics of swift victory overroad the ethics of killing large numbers of civilians.

18 posted on 05/18/2007 9:03:19 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
"How about firebombing civilian populations causing tens of thousands of casualties among women and children in order to hasten the end to a war. How about using atomic bombs on civilian populations causing hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties including thousands of children all in order to bring a war to a more rapid close. "

Those were command level decisions carefully crafted and weighed to save lives by shorting a war.

The ethics now being taught at field level were field level "antics" can upset an overall strategy in an area.

That stated, the firebombing was a bad idea and in retrospect, the Allied command would probably agree. In fact, I believe I saw a documentary on the History channel to that effect.

19 posted on 05/18/2007 9:13:20 PM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nevergore; Prokopton

I’ll take the actual decisions, and results, over the “historian” analysis from the History Channel, any day.

Have we won a serious shooting war since WWII?

Have we engaged in total war since then?

Do you think there may be a link there?


20 posted on 05/18/2007 9:24:59 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson