Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does It Mean "The South Shall Rise Again":
The Wichita (KS) Eagle ^ | 23 May 2007 | Mark McCormick

Posted on 05/24/2007 6:03:30 AM PDT by Rebeleye

...he was stunned to see two large Confederate flags flying from trucks...emblazoned with the words "The South Shall Rise Again." I'm stunned, too, that people still think it is cool to fly this flag. Our society should bury these flags -- not flaunt them...because the Confederate flag symbolizes racial tyranny to so many... ...This flag doesn't belong on city streets, in videos or in the middle of civil discussion. It belongs in our past -- in museums and in history books -- along with the ideas it represents.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansas.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: battleflag; cbf; confederacy; confederate; confederatecrumbs; crossofsaintandrew; damnmossbacks; damnyankee; democratsareracists; dixie; dixiedems; flag; kansas; mouthyfolks; nomanners; northernaggression; rednecks; saintandrewscross; scumbaglawyer; southernwhine; southronaggression; southwillloseagain; southwillriseagain; thesouth; trailertrash; trashtalk; williteverend; wishfulthinking; yankeeaggression; yankeebastards; yankeescum; yeahsure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,541-1,557 next last
To: Rebeleye
Ney is the one who is divisive. If he doesn’t want to fly the flag, no problem - I am sure nobody will try to force him to do it. The terror and hate is in Ney’s paranoid mind or simply his pathetic attempt to get his name in the media. To others, the flag is part of their history. Ney might need stronger dose of Valium.
321 posted on 05/24/2007 8:53:55 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
the war between the states

What's that???

322 posted on 05/24/2007 8:55:15 AM PDT by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

Last I looked, you could sew your own shirts, bedsheets, and other products. You didn’t have to import. BTW, if you are truly interested in this, with an open mind, there is a new book by James Huston, “Calculating the Value of the Union.” He shows, using econometric data, that overwhelmingly the tariff was of almost no importance to southerners-—it was all about slavery. Slave capital EXCEEDED that of all the RRs and textile mills in the North put together. With that kind of $$ at stake, it isn’t about a .5% tax on a hunk of yarn.


323 posted on 05/24/2007 8:55:44 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

But you did talk to a census taker, or at least fill out a form. It’s assumed that illegals don’t respond to census forms.


324 posted on 05/24/2007 8:57:05 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

That is the dumbest blog. Its getting really old, too. There is a certain freeper who usually shows up in support of the south in these threads. But his comments are usually over the top. I considered pinging him but I thought we are trying to have a serious discussion here. But you are a yankee sympathizer version of the one who I didn’t name. But you know who I am talking about. Maybe he deserves a ping. The rules are if you mention another freeper who is not in the thread, you have to ping them.


325 posted on 05/24/2007 8:58:46 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; FredHunter08
I have no doubt that it would. But we didn't lose our revolution while the South, well, you all did lose yours.

A little history reading on your part, Non, might help you. The south didn't revolt, they seceded from the Union legally as allowed by the US constitution. The North started the war because they didn't want the south to secede,legal or not. If the north had left the south alone there would have been no war and we would now be split into two nations, perhaps not a good thing but it would have been legally done. The north used force of arms to coerce the south to rejoin the Union. To this day the states have the right to break away from the Union if they wish.

326 posted on 05/24/2007 8:58:49 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Well if you guys can see racism in the Confederate Flag, why do you get upset if someone sees something in your battle song?


327 posted on 05/24/2007 9:01:24 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

no sweat, glad to have assisted a bit.

When I saw it in MCG, I thought it would be a cool project. and it appears to have turned out pretty cool.

You do modelling? I used to but now I have a 66 Olds 442 that utilizes my discretionary time. You can not flog a 1/24 scale car. I can flog the 442 and it rather likes it.

Just like when I was growing up.


328 posted on 05/24/2007 9:03:16 AM PDT by 66-442hot (It isn't smart to kill the golden goose........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

If the south had won, there would have been 2 countries. The United States of America and the Confederate States of America, and I dare say the CSA would be more apt to stand on their own 2 feet and not turned into a welfare state.


329 posted on 05/24/2007 9:04:19 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
The North’s view of taxation as it applied to the Southern States was a key argument in this vein offered up by Southern orators of the day, and they had a very sound point in my view. Just one that comes to mind.

The tariff policies were the result of Southern dominated legislatures going back many years. The oratory was just that: oratory.

Here is a plank from the Republican Platform of 1860, calling for reform of tariffs: "12. That, while providing revenue for the support of the General Government by duties upon imports, sound policy requires such an adjustment of these imposts as to encourage the development of the industrial interests of the whole country; and we commend that policy of national exchanges which secures to the working men liberal wages, to agriculture remunerating prices, to mechanics and manufacturers an adequate reward for their skill, labor and enterprise, and to the nation commercial prosperity and independence."

Neither the Breckenridge Dem Platform, nor the Douglas version addressed tariffs at all. They differ over the right of importing slaves into the Territories. Given that, I find it hard to believe that tariffs were the driving issue that the post-war Lost Cause types propose. It didn't seem to concern the Dems in 1860.

330 posted on 05/24/2007 9:05:01 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
“... the U.S. tariff couldn’t have had much effect on their imports, if it had any effect at all.”

U.S. tariffs on finished imported goods, beginning in 1816, were designed to protect emerging manufacturing firms, located principally in the Northeast, from foreign (primarily English) competition. As these tariffs especially affected (indirectly, as explained previously) the market for raw cotton, South Carolina politicians fought these tariffs relentlessly, leading to the so-called nullification crisis of 1832. Henry Clay, aka The Great Compromiser, led the way to passage of legislation in 1833 which specified the gradual lowering of tariffs to the level existing in 1816.

The tariffs were a huge deal to politicians in both the North and the South, and almost led to South Carolina’s secession in 1832. They must have had, or at the time were perceived to have had, large effects and gave rise to the first militarily relevant sectional conflicts in the U.S.

331 posted on 05/24/2007 9:06:56 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

And who would that be?


332 posted on 05/24/2007 9:07:10 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
The only reason that my family moved from the South to California and finally to Washington was because of the boondoggle the North called “reconstruction”, followed by the Great Depression that hit the South much earlier and far far worse than it hit the North. My family may have been living in the North for the last 90 years, but our heart is still in Dixie.
333 posted on 05/24/2007 9:07:29 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

Coffee spew!! LOL!


334 posted on 05/24/2007 9:08:45 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
it's not like we are a cabal or anything...

Aha! Exactly what I'd expect a conspirasist to say! ;^)

335 posted on 05/24/2007 9:09:33 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Yeah but for everyone we got, you got a hundred. We’re kind of fond of our liberals. They help us toe the conservative line. They keep us straight.


336 posted on 05/24/2007 9:14:11 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: frithguild

aka..war of northern aggression.


337 posted on 05/24/2007 9:14:28 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: LS

I seem to recall that there was an “outreach” program here in CA to get the “undercounted” (read: illegal) minorities accounted for in the 2000 census. They made a big deal out of the anonymity, and that the census workers weren’t to report immigration status.


338 posted on 05/24/2007 9:15:05 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
One of the first things the Confederate government did was legislate their own set of tariffs on a wide range of products and staples, including those from coming the United States. The average southerner who purchased manufactured goods (nails, shovels, cloth, etc.) made in the US in 1860 faced a nex tax on these same goods in 1862.

How long would it take for the southern yoeman to figure out that his sweat was subsidizing the slavocracy?

339 posted on 05/24/2007 9:16:15 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: twonie

LOL! You forgot- raise taxes so everything can be like it was “at home.” Complain incessantly about how much better everything was where they came from. Whine about how slow Southerners move/ get things done. Make fun of our inherent
politeness while they spout curse words in regular conversation that none of us would use worst case scenario.
There are a few nice yankees but they are few and far between and tend to come from more rural areas of the north, not the cities. Complain about the heat and insects and the fact that their favorite plant won’t live here because of the heat and insects. As Tracy Ulman says- GO HOME!


340 posted on 05/24/2007 9:19:46 AM PDT by gardengirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,541-1,557 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson