Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sam Brownback Says GOP Will Not Nominate Pro-Abortion Candidate
LifeNews.com ^ | May 28, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 05/28/2007 10:18:04 PM PDT by monomaniac

Des Moines, IA (LifeNews.com) -- Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas is considered by some to be the best pro-life candidate in the race for the Republican nomination for president in 2008. Whether he or another pro-life candidate wins the nomination, both Brownback and most pro-life advocates believe someone who backs abortion won't represent the party.

At a campaign stop in Iowa over the weekend, Brownback said he has problems with some of the other candidates based on their lack of commitment to pro-life principles.

It may not be him who gets the Republican Party's nod but Brownback seemed to indicate that it wouldn't be pro-abortion ex-New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani either.

"You look at their track records and some are not pro-life,” he said. “I do not believe the party will nominate a pro-choice candidate.”

During the event, he emphasized his track record and said that, as president, he would appoint a Supreme Court justice who could likely provide the fifth and deciding vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“I'm a principled conservative that can get this done,” Brownback said, according to an AP report. “I've got a track record on it. I have a pro-life track record, and a whole-life track record. I think that's something that's very much going to be embraced.”

At the same time, the senator said that he will work to unite both the social and fiscal conservative elements of the GOP to recapture the White House next year. “We win on both wings of the party,” Brownback said Friday. “You can’t win on just one.”

Brownback's campaign is resonating with pro-life advocates and last week he obtained the support of Norma McCorvey, who was the Roe in the landmark high court decision. McCorvey is now a pro-life activist and filed a lawsuit to try to overturn the ruling, though that didn't work out.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2008; abortion; amnesty; elections; prolife

1 posted on 05/28/2007 10:18:06 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

and it won’t nominate a guy like him who voted against the surge and is pro amnesty.


2 posted on 05/28/2007 10:25:49 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
But we will vote for a guy like this:






Freepmail me to join/leave the **high volume** Duncan Hunter Pinglist

Freepmail seanmerc to join the Veterans for Hunter Pinglist

Contribute to Duncan Hunter's Presidential Campaign -- http://www.gohunter08.com


3 posted on 05/28/2007 10:27:34 PM PDT by Antoninus (P!ss off an environmentalist wacko . . . have more kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Sam's utterly wrong on illegal immigration, unfortunately. Otherwise, he'd be a good candidate.

Duncan Hunter is the real deal as far as pro-life candidates go. Sam would do us all a favor if he would drop out and get on Hunter's team. We need to consolidate and unify to knock out Rudy McRomney.
4 posted on 05/28/2007 10:29:44 PM PDT by Antoninus (P!ss off an environmentalist wacko . . . have more kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Brownback and Duncan Hunter are the most pro-life candidates, imo, because they both supported Terri Schiavo, and they both made the effort to speak at the pro-life rally in D.C.

Some of the other GOP presidential candidates are very pro-life, too, but Brownback and Hunter have the strongest passion.

“John Hawkins: Would you like to see Roe v. Wade overturned?

Duncan Hunter: Yes. You know, I’m the author of the personhood-at-conception bill which right now has over 100 co-sponsors ...that would define personhood as moment of conception, so, it would allow us to have a reversal of the effects of Roe v. Wade without a constitutional amendment.”

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=114155


5 posted on 05/28/2007 10:33:27 PM PDT by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Dunc’s gonna be Fred’s DefSec. ;-)


6 posted on 05/28/2007 10:34:25 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Dunc’s gonna be Fred’s DefSec. ;-)

What an excellent choice that would be. Here's hoping that Fred is in a position to make that pick.

7 posted on 05/28/2007 10:51:57 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

A stopped clock moment?


8 posted on 05/28/2007 11:31:33 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

“Duncan Hunter is the real deal as far as pro-life candidates go. Sam would do us all a favor if he would drop out and get on Hunter’s team. We need to consolidate and unify to knock out Rudy McRomney.”

You bet!! Brownback along with Tancredo, Tommy Thompson, etal should all get behind Duncan Hunter and build a unified front! Right now they are siphoning off support from each other. Get behind Hunter, wait for at least one of the annointed three to get knocked out and continue the grassroots support for Hunter. Gee, it seems almost too easy!lol


9 posted on 05/28/2007 11:41:02 PM PDT by upsdriver (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“Some of the other GOP presidential candidates are very pro-life, too, but Brownback and Hunter have the strongest passion.”

That is what I look for in a pro-life candidate! Passion not just lip service! I like the guy who has the issue burned deep into his soul! Those who arrive at the prolife position as a political calculation can go smoke rope. No passion/ no commitment.


10 posted on 05/28/2007 11:44:51 PM PDT by upsdriver (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Freudy McRomney?


11 posted on 05/28/2007 11:58:52 PM PDT by nowandlater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“No passion/ no commitment.”

I agree, and my vote goes for candidates who walk the walk.


12 posted on 05/29/2007 2:49:10 PM PDT by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

O.K., then, that eliminates Rudy Julie Annie and who else?


13 posted on 05/29/2007 2:49:48 PM PDT by no dems ( Dear God, how much longer are you going to let Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“Right now they are siphoning off support from each other. Get behind Hunter, ..”

Hopefully they will get behind Hunter.


14 posted on 05/29/2007 2:50:52 PM PDT by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson