Posted on 05/31/2007 7:45:10 PM PDT by teldon30
Edited on 05/31/2007 8:22:05 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
She's a very wise woman. It's very true.
Ratio of singles 20:1
They are all professionals. As to the rest, you don't lose your woman, you just lose your turn.
Nah, not really. Young women go with both older guys and with young guys. Not many takers for 40+ year old women with baggage, unless they are very goodlooking, and even then nobody worth knowing is going to stick around.
Women certainly respond to handsome men, but their instinct towards that quality isn’t nearly as powerful as the male instincts for a goodlooking woman.
Basically, if a guy is fit, well groomed, and well dressed, he passes most womens’ criteria in the looks department. In fact, the threshold is so low that a guy can be paunchy, fairly well groomed, and dressed clean and neat and still pass most womens’ criteria when it comes to looks.
A devastatingly handsome man can’t keep a woman’s interest for long, especially if he messes up in his presentation (comes across as delicate or finicky, for example, or acts i a non-masculine way). On the other hand, a devastatingly goodlooking and well built woman can keep the average guy happy for a long time before he grows disenchanted with her worse qualities.
A guy can have a very long, satisfying romance with a young, fit, and buxom bikini model, and only realize months later that she doesn’t speak much English.
She’s a little long in the tooth for my tastes. Besides, I have a girlfriend. ;-)
Another problem that women with demanding careers find is that many men, on balance, just don't want a female companion with a very busy work schedule. I worked in two major NYC law firms and most of the women were either divorced or single, and in both cases they didn't have many prospects because they were at work 3,000+ hours a year.
I have no interest in a mate who is not going to be around. It's one thing if I had no choice in the matter - that is, most women worked crazy hours. But every man has the choice, and they just reject women who have to work so much that they seldom see them. That's a good thing, in my book.
...and the 10% that are women - YEESH! Most of 'em look like they fell outta the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down!
(I know because I'm there right now - engineering school, not the ugly tree...)
Where do we go? We are hiding from you while enjoying life drinking beer with our friends and discussing how nice it is to not have a "to-do" list pinned on our shirts.
And any upscale, single men who might be in the class are likely to have better options than going out with her
Nope just a little naive. If you’re a “born rich” type of guy you learn to sail, play tennis or ride a horse as a kid. If you’re one of those self-made men in their 30s, you’re working 80 hours a week and don’t have time to take riding lessons.
>>Yeah, but what woman wants a desperate geek? “Revenge of the Nerds” was fiction.<<
Me.
I love my Diablo-playing, HALO playing, code-monkey, fractal-designing nerd.
He doesn’t get mad when I play WarCraft for hours.
I guess part of what I was trying to state is that we are seeing some of the more aggressive and demanding traits we typically associate with males being exhibited by more women (not all). Men have not responded well to the feminazation attempts very well either. I'm not female bashing. Its just that the education system (where alot of liberals reside) has implemented their social experiment under the noses of parents for 30 years now and the result is not too good IMHO.
Hey! You stay outta my tree, now!!! ;-P
Good answer! At 58, she is content with her life and doesn't want much (i.e., not greedy or a gold-digger). Plus she's healthy and would do anything for him, especially him being 42.
I miss the rathskellar, not the homework.
Talk to my husband (about the skellar and homework and the women at Penn State).
I didn’t mean to come off like all psu women look down upon the engineering students. I didn’t and many didn’t. Some did. Engineers are detail oriented and basically men, according to my husband and from my experience, in the dorms while a psu student, engineering students were not the “type” my dormmates, friends, etc. were interested in. While I was there, many of the articles in the Collegian were negative about engineering students. Those students were “ice cold” or “only concerned with grades, their education, details” not “boyfriend”material, etc. I always thought this was because one couldn’t argue with them logically (they are so logical) and don’t fall for the emotional parts (but that’s just my opinion). They fix things, they, like many men when confronted with a problem, look for a solution, they want to fix it. It’s not that they don’t have any emotions but when a problem arises, they want to fix it. they’re not into venting and don’t understand us just wanting to vent. I’m going by my husband not that he’s a poster child for this or anything.
It’s funny because today we were talking about the differences between men and women and we were talking about a couple of married friends and their particular problems, and he really didn’t think I understood. He said I didn’t understand (long long story) and I told him what I thought and he said “you really do understand how men think” and I was like duh, it took you 20+ years to figure that out. I really do understand that platonic means different things to men and women and I really do understand that men think differently than women in some instances. Now he understands that I get it. Took him 20+ years but that’s cos he tunes me out half the time. and half the time, I can’t blame him since I vent a lot to him.
I miss pounding the ponies - I’m old. Do you still do the wide mouth beers? The only time I ever had them was at State.
And of course, WE ARE PENN STATE :)
Nice thread ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.