Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson no panacea for conservatives: Orange County Republicans still searching for their candidate
The Orange County Register ^ | Sunday, June 3, 2007 | DENA BUNIS

Posted on 06/03/2007 12:43:04 PM PDT by truth_seeker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Brices Crossroads

“I do not even know if I care that much what Orange County collectively thinks.”

OC doesn’t think collectively. OC thinks action, business. Three million population, lowest unemployment rate in California. Four of the six most southern counties in California vote Republican. San Diego, Orange, Ventura and San Luis Obispo.

While the rest of the country talks about immigration, Orange County made news with the County and the City of Costa Mesa hitting hard in the jails, to check immigration status.

A good Republican can win California. Reagan did. Nixon did. GHW Bush did, 1988. Several Governors, too.

Collectively perhaps not red-meat conservative enough to statisfy some at FR, but nonetheless far better than the alternatives.

My criteria are 1. Ability to win (primary, general). 2. Policy positions, overall.

For me Thompson and Romney meet those requirements.


61 posted on 06/03/2007 3:19:21 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

It appears Fred has his work cut out, to convince the kingmakers he has the stuff—money, staff, platform, commitment, etc.


How about that Paul fellar? Can he convince the kingmakers in OC that he has the stuff?


62 posted on 06/03/2007 3:20:05 PM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
There are Socal people who really know him and could bankroll his camp;aign, if they thought he was up to the job. Apparently, they do not.

Those people are the same ones that brought us the screw-up Arnold and refused to bankroll a McClintock. Those people are doing more to liberalize this state than the Dems could have dreamed of. Please don't rely on them to help the country.

63 posted on 06/03/2007 3:20:22 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: deport

“How about that Paul fellar? Can he convince the kingmakers in OC that he has the stuff?”

First, he must get hisself invited to a Lincoln Club gig. I can’t help him with that.

Obviously he is to be admired for his understanding of the Constitution’s definition of the role of government.

But like Harry Browne, he cannot be taken seriously about international relations. We sent the Marines to Tripoli, when our interests were involved.


64 posted on 06/03/2007 3:29:06 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: basil

That article was posted back on 4/20 at the following link....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1820588/posts


65 posted on 06/03/2007 3:30:57 PM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: deport
Thanks! I missed that. I can only spend about 12 hrs/day here--LOL!

That should give me a lot more freeper comments to read.

66 posted on 06/03/2007 4:10:32 PM PDT by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: deport

“That article was posted back on 4/20 at the following link....”

I looked into that. The immigration ratings cited by Basil gave Fred a “C” and gave Al Gore a “A-.”

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/delegation.php3?retired=1&District=tn

Now sit back, and consider—should Basil be taken seriously? Is that Basil/basil?


67 posted on 06/03/2007 4:16:55 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

I keep hearing people whine that Thompson didn’t give a good speech in Orange County, as if this matters somehow? Did he belch into the microphone or something?


68 posted on 06/03/2007 4:19:42 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

I keep hearing people whine that Thompson didn’t give a good speech in Orange County,


I haven’t kept up with the event that closely but I seem to remember some saying his speech was more generic based upon their feeling that he still was under contract with the tv show, etc.... In other words he wasn’t free to respond as candidate yet.

I don’t know how true any of the above is.......


69 posted on 06/03/2007 4:24:08 PM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant

LOL! For a while my tagline was “Hunter/Thompson ‘08.”


70 posted on 06/03/2007 4:29:45 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

“A good Republican can win California”

I think the likelihood of a Republican carrying California is so slight, and the expense of the campaign there so great that it makes no sense. The resources should go to Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota,and Michigan, states that are genuinely in play.

No Republican has won California in 20 years, since Bush41 narrowly defeated Dukakis there. Since the Simpson Mazzli Immigration bill in 1986, it has been trending heavily Democratic.

That said, I do believe that a really appealing candidate with some connection to California cannot be written off. I think Thompson fills that bill. Romney, IMHO, does not.


71 posted on 06/03/2007 5:02:51 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Thompson doesn’t need CA to get elected anyway, although he will get more votes from there than McInsane ever would.


72 posted on 06/03/2007 5:06:56 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
I don’t know what they are talking about.. I saw Fred’s speech to the Virginia Rep. club tonight on C Span. He Knocked it out of the park. Trust me.The last time I saw a Presidential contender speech like that was Ronald Reagan. Trust me. If he keeps talking like that He will be the next president!:)

For those haven't seen it it will replayed at 9:30 eastern time on Cspan.

73 posted on 06/03/2007 5:22:00 PM PDT by painter (Oval Office, Fred. Might be something you ought to think about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Until I see a full and adequate explanation for that CFR hookup, there will be no support from me. I like Duncan Hunter as the best of the bunch.


74 posted on 06/03/2007 5:25:55 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

If you think that speach was good the one he gave last night was a Grand Slam!!


75 posted on 06/03/2007 5:29:55 PM PDT by painter (Oval Office, Fred. Might be something you ought to think about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Which CFR? I assume you’re not referring to McCain/Feingold.


76 posted on 06/03/2007 5:51:42 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains; deport
Good news! Now, nobody has to wonder. :)

Here is Fred's speech at the Lincon Club last month, which some folks, (mostly Robert Novak) were not very impressed with. I enjoyed the speech. Admittedly, it wasn't Fred's best speech ever, but I still thought it was quite good. This is in 4 parts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cN3z4mqRn7I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhJ5dy_MTxY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6th2VJDWO0Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8rwX_mzvQQ

77 posted on 06/03/2007 8:31:47 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Fred Thompson. AKA: POTUS 44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: basil
I'd like to know if it was made up of whole cloth--or did Fred at one time support some of this, and has since changed his mind about it and moved on

I can't speak to all of the accusations made against Thompson, but as for the claim that he supports abortion it is flat wrong. Fred's Senate voting record is 100% pro-life, and he got a 100% rating from National Right to Life, the largest pro-life org in the US. If the source of your article would lie about that part of Fred's record I wouldn't give him or her any credibility on the other points either.

Anyone who wants to see how Fred voted while in the Senate can click HERE and see every vote he cast.

78 posted on 06/03/2007 8:59:41 PM PDT by epow ( Policies are many, principles are few, policies change, principles never do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: epow
This is Fred's voting record on gun control.

Voted NO on background checks at gun shows. Require background checks on all firearm sales at gun shows. Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)50; N)50; VP decided YES Reference: Lautenberg Amdt #362; Bill S. 254 ; vote number 1999-134 on May 20, 1999

Voted NO on more penalties for gun & drug violations. The Hatch amdt would increase mandatory penalties for the illegal transfer or use of firearms, fund additional drug case prosecutors, and require background check on purchasers at gun shows. [A YES vote supports stricter penalties]. Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)48; N)47; NV)5 Reference: Hatch Amendment #344; Bill S. 254 ; vote number 1999-118 on May 14, 1999

Voted YES on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. Vote to table or kill a motion to require that all gun sales at gun shows be completed by federally licensed gun dealers. Also requires background checks to be completed on buyers and requires gun show promoters to register with the Treasury. Reference: Bill S.254 ; vote number 1999-111 on May 11, 1999

Voted YES on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. Vote to table [kill] an amendment to make it unlawful for gun dealers to sell handguns without providing trigger locks. Violation of the law would result in civil penalties, such as suspension or revocation of the dealer's license, or a fine. Reference: Bill S 2260 ; vote number 1998-216 on Jul 21, 1998

Looks good to me. The NRA thought so too, and gave him an A rating.

79 posted on 06/03/2007 9:12:06 PM PDT by epow ( Policies are many, principles are few, policies change, principles never do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
I see I'm not alone in my observations. Being a former O.C. Pubby, it was my opinion then, and is still, that most keep their noses 45 degrees above level ground.

Dana, is a sometimes exception.

:O)

P
80 posted on 06/03/2007 10:38:50 PM PDT by papasmurf (<<<<< Click there to see my dogs! Oh, and I have FRed one liners, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson