Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"I would rather go to hell than take orders on how to vote from the Cardinal."
Catholic News Agency ^ | 06/07/07

Posted on 06/07/2007 1:08:32 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever

Sydney, Jun 7, 2007 (CNA).- Catholic lawmakers in Australia said yesterday they will vote in favor of therapeutic cloning regardless of the directives or warnings issued by the archbishop of Sydney.

Tony Stewart of the ruling Labor Party in the New South Wales state parliament, said he would rather go to hell than take orders on how to vote from Cardinal George Pell. "Maybe I'll go to hell, but if I go to hell I'm going to do so by saving a lot of lives, because that's what this bill is about," Tony Stewart said in a radio interview.

Cardinal Pell said recently that cloning is unethical and “a serious moral matter”, which could see the creation of human and animal hybrids.

“Catholic politicians who vote for this legislation must realize that their voting has consequences for their place in the life of the Church," he reportedly said.

Cardinal Pell was soon joined by Archbishop Barry Hickey of Perth who also issued a similar warning. He said that Catholics who vote for cloning, "are acting against the teaching of the Church on a very serious matter and they should, in conscience, not vote that way; but if they do, in conscience they should not go to Communion."

The both prelates said they are considering refusing Holy Communion to Catholic lawmakers who vote in favor of the bill.

"We don't need a religious leader telling members of parliament what should be done," Stewart said in a radio interview.

Lawmakers are being allowed a conscience vote on a bill to bring the country's most populous state into line with the federal government, which overturned a ban on the so-called therapeutic cloning last year.

The new law would allow excess human embryos from in-vitro fertilization treatment to be used to create stem cells for research.

Both state premier Morris Iemma and his deputy, John Watkins, are Catholics who have said they intend to vote for the bill.

"I've already thought seriously about this legislation, and it passes all the ethical and moral issues that I need passed, and gives people hope," said Watkins, who admitted he is upset about the cardinal’s recent statements.

The Anglican Church is also asking lawmakers to vote against the bill.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholic; choosepoorly; cloning; moralabsolutes; politicians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Madness.
1 posted on 06/07/2007 1:08:35 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"Maybe I'll go to hell, but if I go to hell I'm going to do so by saving a lot of lives, because that's what this bill is about," Tony Stewart said in a radio interview.

Thus spake the clueless mortal on matters about which he knew absolutely nothing.

2 posted on 06/07/2007 1:10:59 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

They can always leave the Church. No one is forcing them to stay.


3 posted on 06/07/2007 1:11:08 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (A man who will not defend himself does not deserve to be defended by others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Strong words, he doesn’t know what he is saying.


4 posted on 06/07/2007 1:11:39 PM PDT by stevio ((NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

I don’t go in for all that Catholic nonsense of mixing church and state, but all the same, this guy’s statement is absolutely ludicrous. Of course, he’s probably never actually read the Bible, nor does he probably actually believe in hell, so why should he be expected to have a clear view of what he’s saying?


5 posted on 06/07/2007 1:14:40 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Run Fred RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Tony Stewart of the ruling Labor Party in the New South Wales state parliament, said he would rather go to hell than take orders on how to vote from Cardinal George Pell.

He knows not what he is saying.


6 posted on 06/07/2007 1:22:15 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"Maybe I'll go to hell, but if I go to hell I'm going to do so by saving a lot of lives, because that's what this bill is about," Tony Stewart said.

This guy is willing to lose his own soul for the sake of a vote. This has really got to be one of the most ignorant comments I've ever seen in my life. Does he think he's a HERO or somethin?

It is certainly NOT what Jesus meant when he said the greatest love is to give one's life for another. He certainly didn't want us to lose our own SPIRITUAL SOULS in saving others. (Physical lives is a whole 'nother matter.)

The irony is that it's still debatable if what he's sacrificing his own soul for will even SAVE the lives of others.

7 posted on 06/07/2007 1:25:33 PM PDT by Caravaggio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

A local UHF chnnel brodcast the episode of the Simpsons where Bart “sells his soul” to Milhouse. Suddenly, automatic doors won’t open, his breath won’t fog mirrors,etc. I think five minutes after this guy is dead, he is going to learn a great deal about the religious faith he was obviously “born into” and not “reborn into.”


8 posted on 06/07/2007 1:25:59 PM PDT by 50sDad (Angels on asteroids are abducting crop circles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"We don't need a religious leader telling members of parliament what should be done," Stewart said in a radio interview.

What's sad is that the religious leader feels like he HAS to tell the members what should be done, since they seem to dense to understand what's moral and right.

9 posted on 06/07/2007 1:29:42 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Maybe I’ll go to hell, but if I go to hell I’m going to do so by saving a lot of lives, because that’s what this bill is about,” Tony Stewart said in a radio interview

You know what pal? When you’re burning down there, I think you’ll have second thoughts about your choices up here!


10 posted on 06/07/2007 1:32:06 PM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

“he would rather go to hell”

As you wish!


11 posted on 06/07/2007 1:37:38 PM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevio

I think he has obstinate covered.


12 posted on 06/07/2007 1:40:22 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Sen. Graham, that's right... Say it loud, i'm an American citizen and i'm proud... heifer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

The Catholic Church would do well to watch the dealings between the Priests and little boys.

The Catholic Church is no friend of the USA. They are more Liberal European than the worst Dutchman.

Let the Catholic Church watch to their own house before they start to tell me how to run my country. I’m a practicing Catholic. But I believe much less in my church than I do in my God. My God and my church seem almost two different things. When I sense a conflict between the two, I invariable go with the words of my God and find a better path.

I mean; no more purgatory, how many people are burning in he!! because they ate meat on Friday, Priests who can’t marry so that the Church doesn’t have to provide for widows and children, … The list goes on.


13 posted on 06/07/2007 1:40:33 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is a body that worships consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” -Margaret Tha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Catholics do not mix Church and State. The thing that has always brought persecution and hostility to the Church is actually the fact that it regards itself as separate from the State and not answerable to it, but to God alone.

These politicians are objecting because they feel the Church SHOULD go along with the State in whatever the State feels like doing at a given moment. The bishops are simply telling them that they cannot put the State first in a matter that violates Catholic moral teaching - and expect to be considered good Catholics who can go to Communion. They are public sinners, publicly flouting the moral teachings of the Church, and are being publicly called to come back and accept Church teachings.

That said, they probably don’t believe a darn thing. After all, Bill Clinton claimed to read his Bible every day, and look how it changed his life...not!


14 posted on 06/07/2007 1:43:56 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"Cardinal Pell said recently that cloning is unethical and “a serious moral matter”, which could see the creation of human and animal hybrids."

Only the Pope, when speaking "excathedra" (from the throne) can rule on matters of faith and morals.

Heck, you don't even have to be a priest to be a cardinal.

15 posted on 06/07/2007 1:56:18 PM PDT by etcetera (“A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.” Sigmund Freud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
That can be arranged.
16 posted on 06/07/2007 2:05:56 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

“therapeutic cloning” sounds like biological do-overs...


17 posted on 06/07/2007 2:12:17 PM PDT by jagusafr (The proof that we are rightly related to God is that we do our best whether we feel inspired or not")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

I give up! What ine the H-E-double-tooth-picks is therapeutic cloning!? Can I have a therapeutic clone of my own who can mow my grass and bring martinis to me until I need to harvest body parts so I can prolong my worthless existence? Can I kill my therapeutic clone if he turns out to be my better angel? That isn’t murder is it?


18 posted on 06/07/2007 2:21:05 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
"I've already thought seriously about this legislation, and it passes all the ethical and moral issues that I need passed, and gives people hope," said Watkins, who admitted he is upset about the cardinal’s recent statements.

Well, that may be fine in The Church of Watkins, with its' lower moral standards, but he should not try to force his watered down morality upon God and His Church here on earth. Trying to recreate God in one's own image is a good way to obtain the "hottest ticket in town" if one is not careful. If this legislation passes "all the ethical and moral issues that he needs passed", then he should go start his own church, and quit telling the Catholic Church what it is (and is not) supposed to believe.

The Catholic Church is fully within its' rights to tell its' members that if they continue to engage in certain behaviors, they will be effectively removed from the Church. If these people want to be Catholics, then they need to ACT like Catholics. Otherwise, they should stop calling themselves Catholics, and go find themselves a different Church. God and his Church are not a democracy. These people need to get over themselves.

As far as I remember, the Catholic Church strictly forbids committing evil for the sake of preventing a greater evil (as in grinding up unborn children for their stem cells so that those who have already been lucky enough to dodge the abortion mills can have THEIR diseases cured).

There are three situations in which the Church allows killing, and this is not one of them. The three allowed circumstances where lethal force is permitted, as I recall, are (the wording is my own, "off the top of my head", so it is not "official" - any errors are unintentional, and mine alone):

1. Self-defense, or to defend someone else who is currently being attacked.

2. Members of the military engaged in defending their nation during a JUST war.

3. Captial punishment, when carried out by a legitmate government for legitimate reasons.

As always, if I have gotten any of this wrong, feel free to correct me.
19 posted on 06/07/2007 2:25:53 PM PDT by Zetman (I believe the children are the next generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"I would rather go to hell than take orders on how to vote from the Cardinal."

Well, that's certainly a choice you're free to make, although I don't personally recommend it.
20 posted on 06/07/2007 2:32:33 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Romans 10:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson