Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Gates to Announce Gen. Pace Resignation at 1pm. News Conf.
Fox News | 06/08/2007

Posted on 06/08/2007 9:59:50 AM PDT by tsmith130

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-211 last
To: AndyJackson

I’m sure with his experience and time in the service, he has more to offer than going out and being a talking head for CNN or one of the others. He has the experience to assit the troops. Use it for that. Not for CNN.


201 posted on 06/09/2007 3:33:14 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Bush needs to be impeached for the illegal immigration bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

General Pace is a soldier. He’s following orders, a private may not argue with his platoon commander, a General does not and should not openly argue with the President, the Secretary of Defense, or Congress. Our congress critters and other such vermin in D.C. may not have any honor, but Pace clearly does.


202 posted on 06/09/2007 3:37:46 PM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL

Agreed...We all said the same thing in effect except General Pace is a Marine.


203 posted on 06/09/2007 3:44:06 PM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
LOL!

Have a great day, FRiend!

204 posted on 06/10/2007 4:47:23 AM PDT by Recovering Hermit (There's another old saying Senator..."Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: brityank
I wonder if he just decided that spending the next few years sitting in front of endless political grand standing sessions disguised as oversight investigations just wasn't worth it.

I think Rumsfield spent near as much time answering their inane questions as he spent at the Pentagon - and that time was probably spent getting ready for the next hearing!

With Hillary! running for POTUS and trying to appease the antis, she can get $million$ of free campaign coverage just by harrassing the military.

205 posted on 06/10/2007 8:37:44 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Thank you. I’ll get back to you when I’m done with the information’s perusal.


206 posted on 06/10/2007 6:13:31 PM PDT by Killborn (BASH BUSH!! All the COOL kids are doing it!!!! Perfect for people with no logic or reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Only two combat veterans on the Republican side. Isn’t that a shame. We need to recruit a stronger, more patriotic slate of senate candidates!


207 posted on 06/11/2007 8:25:11 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Mullen has not seen a day of combat and will be a champion of affirmative action and lowered standards. Look for women to be officially placed into combat arms units and the skids to be greased for the entry of homosexuals into the service.


208 posted on 06/11/2007 8:27:25 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Point well made.


209 posted on 06/11/2007 8:28:29 AM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

As my Colonel brother notes, and many around here do not seem to notice or understand, politics is heavily involved in appointments to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Always has been, sometimes to the detriment of troops in the field.


210 posted on 06/11/2007 9:23:24 AM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Could be one of three things.

1) The dreaded “new tone”. (Ok that’s bad)

2) Further investigations, try to see who’s behind Berger. (This could very well have been derailed by the 2006 Election results.)

3) Or a lack of evidence for more serious crimes. (Clinton impeachment reprise. We didn’t get him on the other, more grevious crimes so perjury will have to do.)


211 posted on 06/14/2007 12:29:39 PM PDT by Killborn (BASH BUSH!! All the COOL kids are doing it!!!! Perfect for people with no logic or reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-211 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson