Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Bush Form a Third Party?
vanity | 6-8-07 | brianbaldwin

Posted on 06/08/2007 11:26:40 AM PDT by Brian_Baldwin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Vn_survivor_67-68

I wish I had as much faith in the people’s House and Reps as you do. I fear that their price might be a lot lower than those in the Senate. At least in the House, there really are some conservatives and some patriots who won’t sell out the country at any price, but not nearly enough to stop this IMO. All the “wobbly” ones and the RINOs got to see in ‘06 what Soros and co. could do with the right candidate and a bunch of $ to get rid of even fairly popular long serving members. And none of them were even offered a “golden parachute” for their vote. All they got was a target on the back.


21 posted on 06/08/2007 12:54:00 PM PDT by penowa (NO more Bushes; NO more Clintons EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hornet19

Thank you. I’ve been using the tag since the Clintons went to the WH for the portrait unveiling. Gag me with a spoon!


22 posted on 06/08/2007 1:00:17 PM PDT by penowa (NO more Bushes; NO more Clintons EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1847182/posts

Check it.


23 posted on 06/08/2007 1:06:51 PM PDT by M203M4 (Vote Fruity Giuliani or the terrists will win! Abortion & gun control = price for freedumb!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
Most are anti-freeping over with the Rudy bots at wideawake.net, pimping RINOS, drooling over Fruity's plan to make a Department of Nation Building (big-government turd-world neocon diarrhea Mcsplosion), and making excuses for liberalism.

Huh?

Anyway, it sounds like Rudy's fans know what they're voting for.

Better than voting for a candidate who attacks "nation-building" and ends up trying it with a vengeance.

Like I did.

There's something to be said for being "wide awake" and voting with one's eyes open this time around.

24 posted on 06/08/2007 1:38:30 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: penowa

If he said that, I sure missed it. I watch pretty regularly but not every night. What I’ve seen is him chopping it up and debating with folks why it’s amnesty and bad for America. His hypothetical proposal tonight was far more strict than the current bill. He does strike me as the type who would rather see Congress doing something rather than nothing. That’s not always a good thing, IMO.


25 posted on 06/08/2007 5:20:19 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

He already did. They are called the Rovians.


26 posted on 06/08/2007 5:23:17 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Hey Bush! "An Inconvenient Truth" you insulted me in a manner that you will not be forgiven for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penowa

Where were you when good ole Bill after pointing out all its faults said he would still support it because it was better than doing nothing?


You are correct....I have not watched BOR since...he wussed out while the rest of us called and put demands on our senators.


27 posted on 06/08/2007 5:34:35 PM PDT by teldon30 (disgruntled 2nd class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

He did say that...i was extremely disappointed in him...he rolled over.


28 posted on 06/08/2007 5:37:16 PM PDT by teldon30 (disgruntled 2nd class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

Bravo! Bravo! Bravo! Excellent creative writing.


29 posted on 06/09/2007 2:01:55 AM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Bush is so yesterday, they are all rabidly supporting Drooliani. The less conservative the republican is the more the “neocons” love him. W was the neocon presidency in action.


30 posted on 06/09/2007 8:26:28 AM PDT by TradicalRC ("...this present Constitution, which will be valid henceforth, now, and forever..."-Pope St. Pius V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

i voted for bush boy or bush bot 2x,

and i can’t tell you how angry i am.


31 posted on 06/09/2007 8:30:01 AM PDT by ken21 (tv: 1. sells products. 2. indoctrinates viewers into socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

How angry are you?


32 posted on 06/09/2007 8:32:58 AM PDT by null and void ("Wherever liberty has sprouted around the world, we find American blood at its roots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: null and void

i can’t tell you!

lol.


33 posted on 06/09/2007 8:37:46 AM PDT by ken21 (tv: 1. sells products. 2. indoctrinates viewers into socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

what bushbots?

i haven’t seen any bushbots around these parts for awhile


Oh they go by different names every 4 to 8 years.... but they have the SAME slogan....

“Our guy is the only one who can WIN”...

= /


34 posted on 06/09/2007 8:42:28 AM PDT by RachelFaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevao

OH HO HO, how clever. :p


35 posted on 06/09/2007 8:44:07 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

I used to be accused of being a bushbot. And I probably was one. I defended his fiasco choice of HM for supremes. On the grounds of giving W the benefit of the doubt.

I’ve done that too many times.

No more.


36 posted on 06/09/2007 12:14:35 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TradicalRC

I’ve given up trying to understand what people mean when they say neocon. Theh only consistency I see is “support Israel too much”.

I hope that’s not you.


37 posted on 06/09/2007 12:16:11 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I used to be accused of being a bushbot. And I probably was one. I defended his fiasco choice of HM for supremes. On the grounds of giving W the benefit of the doubt.

I’ve done that too many times.

No more.


Amen to that !!

Like the saying GW botched.... Fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice... we won’t get fooled again !

Hehehehe


38 posted on 06/09/2007 12:22:37 PM PDT by RachelFaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

LOL!


39 posted on 06/09/2007 12:24:40 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
"Should Bush Form a Third Party?"

God knows I wish he would and that he'd immediately take himself and his friends out of the Republican party that I'd like to be able to vote for again....

As things now stand, I am changing my registration as I can not associate with these traitors

40 posted on 06/09/2007 12:28:34 PM PDT by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson