Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should Bush Form a Third Party?
vanity | 6-8-07 | brianbaldwin

Posted on 06/08/2007 11:26:40 AM PDT by Brian_Baldwin

Ted Party-boat Kennedy announced this afternoon they aren’t givin’ up – he’s handing out beanies from his boat to “da Boyz” and they are going to rally with Lindsey Grahamnesty, George Buffalo Bush, and the Philadelphia lawyer Arlen Specter to revive this Limousine ride that has turned into an African Safari. Meanwhile, Bush is in a jeep going down a deserted highway without headlights in the African moonlight, driving into the darkness at seventy miles an hour on an eerie ride, as we are told by the Bushbots it is “silvery under the moonlight” to make is sound perhaps even romantic. But being the headlights are out there are those constant jars as George hits a tortoise now and then, and periodically the engine dies out and Bush is looking around saying “who’s gonna’ push?”, but there doesn’t seem to be anyone around to push.

"We are not giving up. We are not giving in," Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., told reporters after he got off the phone with Bush Senior, the “I’m quitting the NRA” Senior Bush who was on a cell phone call with Dubya who was side-lined at the G-8 with a sour stomach after he heard the “Immigration” Limousine Liberal Bill was now looking like a freeway car fire thanks in part to those crazy right-wingers that FOX News Bill O’Reilly has been complaining about of late. Senior Bush had called up junior Bush who was eating a meditative bowl of Mexican pinto beans to give him advice – “Stay open to a thumb suck”.

“When it is recognized by the American people that the Senate has not acted (on immigration), I believe there is going to be a wave of support for what we have been trying to do," said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa. . .

Oh really? Is that what is going to happen?

Maybe what’s happening here is that the Republican base, who wants the Republican Party to live up to Republican principles, isn’t going to be joining any Third-Party after all. Instead, maybe what’s happening is the Republican base who wants the Republican Party to live up to Republican principles is going to lead the Republican Party rather than be led. And maybe the Bushbots don’t see it yet, but maybe the ones in trouble aren’t the right-wingers that Bill O’Reilly has been complaining about, but the Bushbot wing of the Republican Party is in trouble.

In fact, perhaps the best strategy of the Republican candidates for 2008, the winning strategy for 08, is sort of the same strategy of the Democratic candidates for 08 – and that is to run against George Bush and the Bushbots.

“But George Bush isn’t running in Oh-eight”, you say.

No, he isn’t running in Oh-eight, and the Republican base wants to make sure of that. They don’t want a Bushbot in a Lindsey Graham or any of the others, they don’t want Bush or his bots, no sir. And ANY Republican candidate who is going to run and thinks they are going to win needs to get the message out, “I’m NOT George Bush”.

And the best way to do that is to just say no to the Bush-Kennedy "Immigration" Mandarin bill.

And no, it’s not going to be the Republican base that needs to move on to a Third-Party. And, seriously, I think perhaps it’s time that George Bush, his entire family, the Bushbots, et all, consider forming or joining a Third-Party.

Forming a Third-Party, rather than joining an existing one, probably makes more sense in that all of the existing Third-Parties probably wouldn’t want them.

Bill O’Reilly may not like it, but what we are seeing is something historical – it started about twenty years ago and has been slowly but increasingly growing, and the Mandarins in the Republican Party such as the Bushbots et all, are now having to lay down their fingernail files and are starting to have the obvious signs of what can only be described as “culture shock”.

The Mandarins are starting to find themselves forced to be in the same “tent” as the Republican base, and it’s a real culture shock for them.

The Mandarins of the Qing Dynasty Republi-crats turn to the Mandarins of the Tang Dynasty Demo-cans, and say “My God, I would rather associate with the Tang Mandarins then them (the peasants)”.

What to eat. What car to drive. If you are “clean” enough to even drive a car. And the Mandarins not only want to tell you what to eat, they want to tell you that there are no borders anymore, there are only “estates”. Estates is where they are going to live.

Where are you going to live?

You know, perhaps someone should remind Arlen Specter, Ted Kennedy, Lindsey Graham, John Edwards, the Mandarins et all, the old saying, “The real measure of your wealth is how much you’d be worth if you lost all your money”.

Perhaps they can call their new Third-Party, the Mandarin Party.

And their mascot can be the Dodo bird.

Perhaps the “independent” Bill O’Reilly, who is now starting to grow his fingernails, can join the new Third-Party and be their press spokesperson, being that he believes he is the prophet and regrets but nevertheless in his wisdom had to support the “Immigration” Bill in that it’s our only choice anyway, I mean “what can we do?”, and no one is going to stop it, certainly not those crazy Right-wingers who according to Life With Bill are really nothing but a bunch of smear artists and don’t appreciate very long fingernails.

Arlen, you wouldn’t be worth any more than that Limousine that’s on fire under the hood. You turned off exit 49 out to Highway 61. I know, you are getting old and you made a mistake at exit 49, a senior moment perhaps. You got to get back to filing your fingernails. Oh my God, and you look around before you open the door to get out of the burning Limo, and look over there. There’s these little fires burning – lots of them – “out there”, and, it’s getting dark. Should you get out and kick the fires? Oh no, maybe not. Just stay in the burning Limousine. After all, it’s a Limo.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Vn_survivor_67-68

I wish I had as much faith in the people’s House and Reps as you do. I fear that their price might be a lot lower than those in the Senate. At least in the House, there really are some conservatives and some patriots who won’t sell out the country at any price, but not nearly enough to stop this IMO. All the “wobbly” ones and the RINOs got to see in ‘06 what Soros and co. could do with the right candidate and a bunch of $ to get rid of even fairly popular long serving members. And none of them were even offered a “golden parachute” for their vote. All they got was a target on the back.


21 posted on 06/08/2007 12:54:00 PM PDT by penowa (NO more Bushes; NO more Clintons EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hornet19

Thank you. I’ve been using the tag since the Clintons went to the WH for the portrait unveiling. Gag me with a spoon!


22 posted on 06/08/2007 1:00:17 PM PDT by penowa (NO more Bushes; NO more Clintons EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1847182/posts

Check it.


23 posted on 06/08/2007 1:06:51 PM PDT by M203M4 (Vote Fruity Giuliani or the terrists will win! Abortion & gun control = price for freedumb!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
Most are anti-freeping over with the Rudy bots at wideawake.net, pimping RINOS, drooling over Fruity's plan to make a Department of Nation Building (big-government turd-world neocon diarrhea Mcsplosion), and making excuses for liberalism.

Huh?

Anyway, it sounds like Rudy's fans know what they're voting for.

Better than voting for a candidate who attacks "nation-building" and ends up trying it with a vengeance.

Like I did.

There's something to be said for being "wide awake" and voting with one's eyes open this time around.

24 posted on 06/08/2007 1:38:30 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: penowa

If he said that, I sure missed it. I watch pretty regularly but not every night. What I’ve seen is him chopping it up and debating with folks why it’s amnesty and bad for America. His hypothetical proposal tonight was far more strict than the current bill. He does strike me as the type who would rather see Congress doing something rather than nothing. That’s not always a good thing, IMO.


25 posted on 06/08/2007 5:20:19 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

He already did. They are called the Rovians.


26 posted on 06/08/2007 5:23:17 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Hey Bush! "An Inconvenient Truth" you insulted me in a manner that you will not be forgiven for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penowa

Where were you when good ole Bill after pointing out all its faults said he would still support it because it was better than doing nothing?


You are correct....I have not watched BOR since...he wussed out while the rest of us called and put demands on our senators.


27 posted on 06/08/2007 5:34:35 PM PDT by teldon30 (disgruntled 2nd class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

He did say that...i was extremely disappointed in him...he rolled over.


28 posted on 06/08/2007 5:37:16 PM PDT by teldon30 (disgruntled 2nd class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

Bravo! Bravo! Bravo! Excellent creative writing.


29 posted on 06/09/2007 2:01:55 AM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Bush is so yesterday, they are all rabidly supporting Drooliani. The less conservative the republican is the more the “neocons” love him. W was the neocon presidency in action.


30 posted on 06/09/2007 8:26:28 AM PDT by TradicalRC ("...this present Constitution, which will be valid henceforth, now, and forever..."-Pope St. Pius V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

i voted for bush boy or bush bot 2x,

and i can’t tell you how angry i am.


31 posted on 06/09/2007 8:30:01 AM PDT by ken21 (tv: 1. sells products. 2. indoctrinates viewers into socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

How angry are you?


32 posted on 06/09/2007 8:32:58 AM PDT by null and void ("Wherever liberty has sprouted around the world, we find American blood at its roots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: null and void

i can’t tell you!

lol.


33 posted on 06/09/2007 8:37:46 AM PDT by ken21 (tv: 1. sells products. 2. indoctrinates viewers into socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

what bushbots?

i haven’t seen any bushbots around these parts for awhile


Oh they go by different names every 4 to 8 years.... but they have the SAME slogan....

“Our guy is the only one who can WIN”...

= /


34 posted on 06/09/2007 8:42:28 AM PDT by RachelFaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevao

OH HO HO, how clever. :p


35 posted on 06/09/2007 8:44:07 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

I used to be accused of being a bushbot. And I probably was one. I defended his fiasco choice of HM for supremes. On the grounds of giving W the benefit of the doubt.

I’ve done that too many times.

No more.


36 posted on 06/09/2007 12:14:35 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TradicalRC

I’ve given up trying to understand what people mean when they say neocon. Theh only consistency I see is “support Israel too much”.

I hope that’s not you.


37 posted on 06/09/2007 12:16:11 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I used to be accused of being a bushbot. And I probably was one. I defended his fiasco choice of HM for supremes. On the grounds of giving W the benefit of the doubt.

I’ve done that too many times.

No more.


Amen to that !!

Like the saying GW botched.... Fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice... we won’t get fooled again !

Hehehehe


38 posted on 06/09/2007 12:22:37 PM PDT by RachelFaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

LOL!


39 posted on 06/09/2007 12:24:40 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
"Should Bush Form a Third Party?"

God knows I wish he would and that he'd immediately take himself and his friends out of the Republican party that I'd like to be able to vote for again....

As things now stand, I am changing my registration as I can not associate with these traitors

40 posted on 06/09/2007 12:28:34 PM PDT by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson