Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Amnesty Bill a Strategery? - VANITY
FR ^ | 6/9/06 | jebeier

Posted on 06/08/2007 12:18:29 PM PDT by jebeier

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-144 next last
To: sand88

Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter could definitely run against President Bush on this issue.

No matter what, the next election will not have George W. Bush on the ballot. By giving the Republicans something to run against, President Bush has done a great service to his Party.

Whether or not that was intentional is the question.


61 posted on 06/08/2007 12:46:31 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to evil intent that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

I dunno, I guess it could happen but I like your thinking.


62 posted on 06/08/2007 12:48:12 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

The original quote way by Napoleon. I always wondered about that.


63 posted on 06/08/2007 12:49:59 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to evil intent that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Maybe I’m over-reaching. I just don’t think stupidity is adequate to explain this debacle.


64 posted on 06/08/2007 12:50:49 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to evil intent that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Personally, I don’t seem what is wrong with Vigilantes. The A-5 was beautiful aeroplane...

Oh, right.

I still don’t see what is wrong with Vigilantes. If gub’mint won’t enforce the law, somebody has gotta do it, right?


65 posted on 06/08/2007 12:51:20 PM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
No, the WH had no idea this was going to fail. Someone in the Gang of 12 who put the junk together did however. That was the guy who wanted it put out on the Senate floor for about 15 minutes of discussion and then a vote.

He knew that the Democrats didn't control a majority of the votes if the Senators had any opportunity to discuss it.

What surprised him in the end is that he couldn't even find a majority on a cloture vote ~ Harry Reid looked positively surprised at that outcome!

The Dems are weak so it's time to strike.

66 posted on 06/08/2007 12:52:36 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

Anyway, I gotta run. I’ll check back in tonight...


67 posted on 06/08/2007 12:53:33 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jebeier


Nuff said...
68 posted on 06/08/2007 12:55:09 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The Dems are weak so it's time to strike.

Striking is good. I like striking...

And what revealed that the Democrats were so weak? Hmmmmmm?

STATEGERY!

69 posted on 06/08/2007 12:55:29 PM PDT by jebeier (Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
If it is strategery, it is exceptionally subtle and devious, and would be a masterpiece. But they really couldn't possibly be that clever, could they?

No, I don't believe it's possiblistic.

70 posted on 06/08/2007 1:00:31 PM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
Maybe they are just that craven.

Now you've got it.

71 posted on 06/08/2007 1:02:15 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
I think it's just a case of "W" believing the lie told to him by Republicans in the Senate (in private) that the Dems had this one in the bag, and that was a lie Harry Reid told the other Dems.

That is to say it's a KOINKYDINK!!!, but a highly serendipitous one at that.

Rove's still scratching his head and "W" wonders today if Putin tried to poison him at dinner yesterday.

72 posted on 06/08/2007 1:02:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

Whud’ya gonna’ say for yourself next week.... when Bush starts leaning on wobbly Republicans to breath life back into that turd of a bill?


73 posted on 06/08/2007 1:02:37 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

She looks creepy in that picture.


74 posted on 06/08/2007 1:15:37 PM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

I have had the very same thought...gwb has wanted this forever, but to openly call the american people names who are against this....i thought this was a way to rally the base, and hopefully prevent 2006 from happening in 2008..


75 posted on 06/08/2007 1:18:12 PM PDT by joe fonebone (Nothin' from Nothin' leaves Nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

Was calling his entire base of loyal patriotic Conservatives a bunch of unamerican bigots also part of the cunning strategery?

Sorry I dont buy it.

Bush wanted this abominable bill real bad, and he still wants it. He doesnt give a rats tutu about the future, he just wants to placate his amigos in Mexico and blast the core of the Republican base who stood by him during the entire Iraq disaster.

He has lost me forever.


76 posted on 06/08/2007 1:19:59 PM PDT by UncleSamUSA (the land of the free and the home of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
"Sarkozy just won in France by running against Chirac, who was the head of his own party."

Um, No. Sarkozy ran against Royal. Chirac supported Sarkozy.

77 posted on 06/08/2007 1:23:48 PM PDT by Ludicrous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
I have also considered some of the possibilities you raised. I don’t think this was a deliberate strategery, however the fallout is most welcome.
78 posted on 06/08/2007 1:35:23 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jebeier

I actually hope you’re right. I’m not a Bush basher.


79 posted on 06/08/2007 1:38:42 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
And all it has cost him is a few points in the public opinion polls, =

A few points in the opinion polls, and his ENTIRE base.

And with the way he pushed this bill so publicly and fiercely, he is just as tied to illegal immigration as his good buddy Ted.

80 posted on 06/08/2007 1:41:34 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson