Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans Declare War on Secret Earmarks & Wasteful Spending
Townhall.com ^ | June 11, 2007 | John Boehner

Posted on 06/11/2007 9:37:31 AM PDT by jazusamo

Monday, June 11, 2007

This week on the House floor Democrats in Congress will begin their efforts in earnest to hide pork-barrel projects from voters, budget watchdog groups, and Republicans who challenge wasteful spending. They’re gutting rules designed to help voters know where their tax dollars are going and creating massive slush funds for secret earmarks. And while they shut voters out of the budget process, they’re spending more with each passing day – an extra $105 billion so far this year alone. With the first four major appropriations bill on the House floor this week, Republicans are saying, “Enough is enough.”

Last fall, Democratic leaders repeatedly promised to lead Congress in a more “open” and “honest” fashion. Now they’re not only breaking those promises, they’re actively moving in the opposite direction.

It started in January when Democrats gutted Republican earmark reforms by allowing bills to be certified as “earmark-free” -- even if they contain earmarks. House Democrats exploited this loophole to pass a massive spending bill (“continuing resolution”) in February that contained hundreds of millions of dollars in hidden earmarks. The conveniently-flawed procedure was most famously abused by Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) who secured passage of an illegitimate taxpayer-funded earmark in bill meant to fund our intelligence activities. Murtha was caught by C-SPAN’s cameras threatening House Republicans who tried to object.

After that incident, Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-WI) announced he would simply bypass the rules entirely and “air-drop” pork-projects into legislation after it is too late for lawmakers to challenge them on the House floor. Each of the Democrats’ appropriations bills will include a multi-billion dollar slush fund to make room for these secret earmarks that are being hidden from public scrutiny.

Responding to overwhelming criticism of his plan, Obey has graciously said he will allow Members of Congress to “read the bills” and “write the committee” to inquire about earmarks. That’s nice and all, but as the Wisconsin State Journal – Obey’s home state newspaper – wrote: “With this maneuver, Obey would enhance his own power but prevent the public and most lawmakers from questioning earmarks until it is too late.”

This is reflective of a decades-old belief by Democrats that Washington politicians know how to spend our money better than we do. Democrats won’t even let us see where they’re spending tax dollars anymore – we’re just supposed to nod and smile, and understand that they know what’s best for us.

Well I don’t buy it.

Obey’s insider process will make it easier than ever for Members of Congress to protect the kind of secret spending they know wouldn’t survive public scrutiny. It makes a mockery of the Democrats’ pledge to make the appropriations process more open and transparent.

Couple this with Democrats’ rabid desire to raise taxes and you have real trouble for middle class families and small businesses. They’ve already approved tax hikes on American energy companies (which raises prices at the gas pump), a massive $392.5 billion tax hike on married couples and working families, and are poised to raise taxes again on small businesses and family farmers through the alternative minimum tax. I guess it makes sense to the majority – they have to get the money somewhere for all of their secret spending. It’s just a shame they choose to use taxpayers as their personal piggybank rather than find ways to cut spending elsewhere.

So how do we fix this?

Republicans are declaring war on secret earmarks and wasteful spending, and will fight at every opportunity to force the majority to restore the reforms we enacted last year – the first of their kind – that injected real transparency and real accountability into the budget process. These reforms required public disclosure of all earmarks and their sponsors contained in any bill, making the earmark process more open and transparent to taxpayers. They allowed lawmakers, for the first time ever, to challenge individual taxpayer-funded earmarks.

Americans expect and deserve that kind of transparency and accountability from Congress. Democrats flatly refuse to allow the House to actually debate or vote to remove wasteful earmarks. Republicans will use every tool at our disposal to force the majority to re-adopt our rules and keep their promises to voters.

John Boehner is the Republican Minority Leader for the House of Representatives.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earmarks; lyingdems; murtha; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: jazusamo

this is rich


21 posted on 06/11/2007 9:48:49 AM PDT by fhlh (Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

Tg, that’s exactly what my instructor said on Saturday about gun control.


22 posted on 06/11/2007 9:50:18 AM PDT by wastedyears (Check my profile for links to anti-illegal immigration T-shirts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
House Republicans Declare War on Secret Earmarks & Wasteful Spending

About six years too late for that.

23 posted on 06/11/2007 9:51:44 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Everyone who was “outraged” is probably now just resigned.


24 posted on 06/11/2007 9:53:49 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They should have done this when they were in power.
They would still be in power.
IGNORANT


25 posted on 06/11/2007 9:56:19 AM PDT by conserv8ive1 (Rudy and the Bots...blasting off to oblivion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3; All
It was signed into law so I don't understand how these earmarks can be kept secret---Legally!

President Bush Signs Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act

26 posted on 06/11/2007 9:57:24 AM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The United States Capitol building is really much like a prison. Filled with cheap criminals and thieves. Only at the end of the day they go home or to a political meeting while at prison the criminals are in lock down.


27 posted on 06/11/2007 9:57:28 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I'm gonna vote for Fred. John Bolton for VP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
"Hello, you guys are not in power."

So, you suggest they just roll over and play dead?

28 posted on 06/11/2007 9:59:10 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Not true. When Bush won the White House the Congress did his bidding which was mucho spending. Now they are doing the peoples bidding as it should be. This is a great start and believe because of the immigration bill outrage and our new minority status that the House realized it needed a change. Good for them. We can still change our party from the inside out.
29 posted on 06/11/2007 9:59:22 AM PDT by nativist (Weigh into them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Where were ya John, when you had the power?


30 posted on 06/11/2007 10:02:31 AM PDT by DreamsofPolycarp (Libertarianism: u can run your life better than government can, and should be left alone to do it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Where was our Republican leadership back in 2004, 2005, 2006 when things were out of control.

Little late to be griping when the horse is out of the barn.

31 posted on 06/11/2007 10:04:52 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

Took the words right off my fingers.

Someone should tell Boehner this exact thing: “Hey, Morons! If you’d shown some of this moxie to take on earmarks and spending when you were in power... you’d still be in power!”

So now we know that Republicans act conservative only when they’re in the minority. Thanks for the clue, guys.


32 posted on 06/11/2007 10:21:26 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

That Obey is one slimy S.O.B. That he’s chair of the Appropriations Committee is a sin.


33 posted on 06/11/2007 10:37:31 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Don't you worry, never fear, FDT will soon be here. http://www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I can’t blame Dems, given the 31,000 ‘earmarks’ Tom Delay sheparded through before his fall from power.

That said, David Obey is a first class a$$hole.


34 posted on 06/11/2007 10:39:13 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

No they had the power to be more effective from 1994 to 2006. They pissed away their time.


35 posted on 06/11/2007 10:41:44 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Hey, Republican politicians, you've cried "wolf" before. Now, nobody is running to save your sheep.

Voters put you into the majority before. You had your chance to fix uncontrolled spending, but laughed your way through one pork-laden bill after another.

Don't you dare have the unmitigated gall to blame all the pork on the Democrats. That's insulting in the highest degree.

36 posted on 06/11/2007 10:47:14 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’m throwing the bull$hit card in on this one.


37 posted on 06/11/2007 10:51:12 AM PDT by manic4organic (Send a care package through USO today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan; Badeye
That Obey is one slimy S.O.B. That he’s chair of the Appropriations Committee is a sin.
That said, David Obey is a first class a$$hole.

Agree completely with you both.

38 posted on 06/11/2007 10:51:43 AM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I love ya, John Boehner...you're a good man.

But why the hell didn't you guys do this two years ago????

39 posted on 06/11/2007 10:53:57 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

While I agree with what you say the president did sign the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act last September (post 26) but it was a day late and a dollar short. It seems it’s being ignored now.


40 posted on 06/11/2007 10:58:01 AM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson