Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Duncan)Hunter Opening Statement for Hearing on Recent Chinese Security and Military Developments
House.gov ^ | 6/13/07 | Duncan Hunter

Posted on 06/14/2007 2:28:56 PM PDT by pissant

House Armed Services Committee Ranking Republican Duncan Hunter (R-CA) today released the following opening statement from the committee’s hearing on recent security and military developments in the People’s Republic of China:

“Thank you to my good friend, Ike Skelton, for holding today’s hearing on recent security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. Today, we take a look at China’s military capacity, the pace and scope of its military modernization; and China’s near- and long-term strategic aspirations in the region and around the world. The Pentagon’s 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review Report (QDR) noted that China is at a strategic crossroads with the ‘greatest potential to compete militarily with the United States.’ While much of the public’s attention is focused on ongoing military operations in the Middle East, it is important for this Committee to remain focused on all U.S. security interests throughout the world.

“I would like to welcome our witnesses—Mr. Richard Lawless, the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Asia-Pacific Affairs and Major General Philip M. Breedlove from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. We look forward to your testimony and your perspectives on China’s military modernization ambitions and their impact on the United States and our allies in the Asia Pacific region. We are also interested in hearing about possible areas of cooperation between China and the United States, as well as how we are preparing to deter and prepare for potential unexpected security challenges in the region. This is a timely hearing and we appreciate your appearance here this morning.

“During the last year, China demonstrated its resolve to transform and evolve its military into one that can challenge its regional neighbors first and then into a force that can conduct offensive operations globally.

“In October 2006, a Chinese SONG-class diesel submarine surfaced near the USS Kittyhawk—demonstrating a deep-water capability; on January 11, 2007, China conducted a direct-ascent anti-satellite (ASAT) test—a provocative act signaling the country’s indisputable capability to challenge the United States in space. In March 2007, China continued a fifteen-year trend of double-digit increases in defense spending, announcing that it would increase its annual defense budget by 17.8 percent over the previous year to $45 billion. If you include categories of spending such as foreign acquisitions and military-related research and development, this figure could be as much as $85 to $125 billion.

“Such increased defense spending has contributed to improved capacity and capabilities for the Chinese military. Today, China continues to transform from a coastal navy to a fleet centered on anti-access and area denial. This fleet includes the Russian-purchased SOVREMENNY II guided missile destroyers fitted with anti-ship cruise missiles; nuclear attack and diesel submarines, including twelve KILO-class submarines delivered by Russia, and the Chinese-produced LUYANG II class destroyer with a vertical launch air defense system.

“Additionally, China is modernizing its offensive air capabilities—deploying the F-10 multi-role fighter aircraft to operational units; co-producing the multi-role SU-270 MK/FLANKER fighter with Russia; and arming its tactical aircraft with precision weaponry.

“Lastly, China’s strategic force ambitions remain strong. China has at least ten varieties of ballistic missiles deployed or in development and is updating some of its older systems with improved range, mobility, and accuracy—this includes about 900 CSS-6 and CSS-7 short-range ballistic missiles deployed to garrisons opposite Taiwan. China’s road-mobile DF-31 and its longer variant, DF-31A, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) reached initial threat availability in 2006 and are expected to achieve operational status in 2007. Make no mistake about it, these missiles could target and reach the United States.

“The basis for China’s military modernization efforts and emergence as a regional and global power is its economic engine. During the last ten years, I have watched China become the world’s third largest trading power by devaluing its currency to achieve an export advantage over its trading partners. In 2006, China’s trade surplus with the United States grew to more than $200 billion—a 25 percent increase from 2004. I continue to be very concerned about the Yuan, which remains undervalued by approximately 40 percent and the Chinese use of American ‘greenbacks’ to purchase its ships, planes, and missiles.

“If you look around the world, there is growing evidence that China is pursuing economic relations and military cooperation beyond Asia, including in the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. As China’s demand for energy and natural resources increases, it is partnering with obstinate states such as Iran and Venezuela. In Sudan, China is the country’s number one consumer of oil. In return, China continues to be a major supplier of Sudanese arms, although it has declared its intentions to restrict arms sales to uses outside of Darfur.

“There is certainly positive potential for cooperation between the United States and China. The former commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, Admiral William Fallon, testified at the February 2007 PACOM posture hearing that he is optimistic about the future of U.S.-China relations after two years in command and that ‘military-to-military activities… such as exercises, port visits, and mid-level officer exchanges can over time reduce the potential for misunderstanding and provide the opportunity to positively influence future People’s Liberation Army leaders.’ In addition to military exchanges and exercises, the United States and China are cooperating diplomatically in the Six Party talks focused on a denuclearized North Korea.

“Despite these opportunities, questions remain, such as: What are China’s ‘true’ military intentions and military capabilities—from military contingencies in the Taiwan Straight to other regional contingencies? Will China emerge as a responsible global partner?

“China’s rapid economic growth, double-digit defense spending, investments in military modernization with a focus on power projection and its strategic forces, and increasing presence around the world require a policy employed by one of America’s great leaders, Ronald Reagan—‘Trust, but verify.’ This committee will continue to try to do just that.”


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 2008; china; duncanhunter; elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Duncan Hunter is the only candidate that has been raising the alarm bells about the chicoms for years.
1 posted on 06/14/2007 2:28:58 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; Ultra Sonic 007; AuntB; Paperdoll; RasterMaster; Kevmo; rob21

DH Ping


2 posted on 06/14/2007 2:30:30 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

>>>>The Pentagon’s 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review Report (QDR) noted that China is at a strategic crossroads with the ‘greatest potential to compete militarily with the United States

Let’s not forget the history either:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1845268/posts
HUNTER INTRODUCES “NUCLEAR SECRETS SAFETY ACT” (Duncan Hunter - 2000)

>>>”The Clinton-Gore Administration has, through fumbling incompetence and short-sighted policies, lost critical defense secrets,” said Hunter. “The recent incident at Los Alamos National Laboratory is indicative of the irresponsibility and disregard this administration has given to protecting America’s national security. This legislation begins to correct the problem.”<<<

Duncan Hunter has always had our interests at heart and doesn’t perform for ‘polls’.


3 posted on 06/14/2007 2:35:01 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Hunter does not trust the chicoms. Never has. And despite them NEVER giving us a reason to, the rest of the clowns in government cowtow to these bastards.


4 posted on 06/14/2007 2:38:47 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
That's because it will be your sons spilling their blood in future conflicts and not theirs. Notable exception, of course, being Duncan Hunter. The elites never pay the high price of war.
5 posted on 06/14/2007 2:50:01 PM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DanielLongo

I think you are correct. If we had had the courage to go after AQ in its infancy, 911 would not have happened.


6 posted on 06/14/2007 2:51:30 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If Hunter doesn’t get elected president, we will eventually see the catastrophic results of our trade policies with China.


7 posted on 06/14/2007 2:52:03 PM PDT by rob21 (Duncan Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rob21

Not just trade. We will see the catastrophe of not confronting their worldwide malfeasance as it occurs.


8 posted on 06/14/2007 2:54:42 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Duncan Hunter would now be the best choice for a True American President.

No frills, just the best choice. I have come to this over a period of days.


9 posted on 06/14/2007 2:56:38 PM PDT by dforest (Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If anyone is curious about the history with the Chicoms, I started posting excerpts from the Naked Communist here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1235065/posts?page=27#27


10 posted on 06/14/2007 2:58:27 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

He is certainly the kinda of President that our adversaries would fear. And that is needed, badly.


11 posted on 06/14/2007 3:04:14 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks. Tip of the iceberg too.


12 posted on 06/14/2007 3:04:33 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

God bless him. Holding his own in Congress while keeping a heavy campaign schedual! The man keeps his eye on the ball, so he rarely misses his mark. Highly unusual in this day and age! The man is in this place for a real purpose. Let the people know!

http://www.gohunter08.com.


13 posted on 06/14/2007 3:05:43 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The Chinese represent our largest threat in the years to come. I say the Russians will pose a problem too given their course in the last few years but the Chinese for sure. This has been apparent for years.


14 posted on 06/14/2007 3:08:30 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

Yet we placate the bastards. We should be very restrictive on trade with them. For cheap products, we cna use the Phillipines, Tawain, Malaysia, etc.

Very few in politics have the vision of you, I and Duncan Hunter, apparently.


15 posted on 06/14/2007 3:15:16 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Duncan Hunter is right on target.

Everyone needs to understand that not every case of espionage against the US, committed by the Chicoms, gets written about by the NYT or any other media outlet.

16 posted on 06/14/2007 3:16:01 PM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

God Bless him indeed.


17 posted on 06/14/2007 3:26:20 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

The WSJ editors would be as horrified at confronting the chicoms as they are about confronting illegal immigration seriously.


18 posted on 06/14/2007 3:27:39 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pissant

http://hascaudio.house.gov/FC061307.wma


19 posted on 06/14/2007 4:18:59 PM PDT by Kevin J waldroup (Duncan Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin J waldroup

Thanks.


20 posted on 06/14/2007 4:28:09 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson