Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: 60% of Fertility Patients Would Subject Unborn Children to Research
Life News ^ | 6/21/07 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 06/21/2007 4:31:25 PM PDT by wagglebee

Baltimore, MD (LifeNews.com) -- A new poll conducted by researchers at Duke University Medical Center and John Hopkins University has real concerns for the pro-life community. It found that 60 percent of Americans who are fertility patients would subject their human embryos to scientific research if they weren't going to birth them.

The poll asked patients what they would do with so-called "leftover" human embryos they had no desire to implant and give birth to in a full-term pregnancy.

The poll found that 22 percent would be interested in donating their embryos to couples who are looking for children to adopt. Pro-life advocates say that more should be done to promote the avenue.

Anne Drapkin Lyerly at Duke, talked about the study in a statement and indicated that it was published in the Science Express publication.

She appeared excited by the results and claimed that using so many of the frozen human embryos in existence would be a scientific boon.

"Previous research indicates that there are approximately 400,000 frozen embryos stored in the United States," she said. "If half of those belong to people who are willing to donate embryos for research, and only half that number were in fact donated, there could still be 100,000 embryos available for research."

Ultimately if that many human lives are taken, they would produce 2,000 to 3,000 usable stem cell lines, the researchers said -- which is 100 times the number currently allowed to receive federal funding.

In the study, some 1,020 people were questions who had human embryos frozen at fertility clinics in California, Colorado, Washington, D.C., Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon and Pennsylvania.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; embryo; embryonicstemcells; fertilitytreatments; humanlife; killing; moralabsolutes; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Anne Drapkin Lyerly at Duke, talked about the study in a statement and indicated that it was published in the Science Express publication.

She appeared excited by the results and claimed that using so many of the frozen human embryos in existence would be a scientific boon.

I'm sure Dr. Mengele felt the same way.

1 posted on 06/21/2007 4:31:29 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 06/21/2007 4:31:58 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ..
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 06/21/2007 4:32:20 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bttt


4 posted on 06/21/2007 4:34:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Duh! Naturally, the people willing to get fertility treatments that lead to "extra" embryos very young humans aren't going to be strongly pro-life.
5 posted on 06/21/2007 4:35:15 PM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

IT’S ALL ABOUT ME, ME, ME! CHILDREN BE DAMNED!


6 posted on 06/21/2007 4:38:23 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I can’t help but wonder if this attitude is exactly why they need fertility treatment in the first place.


7 posted on 06/21/2007 5:08:36 PM PDT by EricT. (The tree of liberty needs to be watered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ugh! I don’t know why I read articles like this. Her giddiness just makes me sick to my stomach. :o(


8 posted on 06/21/2007 5:18:25 PM PDT by samiam1972 (http://imrunningforpresident.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samiam1972

Me too!


9 posted on 06/21/2007 5:19:31 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I don’t know about all of these places where individuals were polled, but I do know that California, Oregon and Washington DC are extremely “blue state” areas and have a suspicion that the others may be as well.

The other piece is I suspect they polled folks in metro areas, more likely to have access to the technology, and notably more liberal.

Gosh, d’ya think they might have picked those places to poll for a reason?


10 posted on 06/21/2007 6:11:02 PM PDT by Wicket (God bless and protect our troops and God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

.


11 posted on 06/21/2007 7:38:19 PM PDT by Coleus (God gave us the right to life & self preservation & a right to defend ourselves, family & property)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

.


12 posted on 06/21/2007 7:38:21 PM PDT by Coleus (God gave us the right to life & self preservation & a right to defend ourselves, family & property)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
It found that 60 percent of Americans who are fertility patients would subject their human embryos to scientific research if they weren't going to birth them.

That's no surprise. After all, these are the same narcissists who would rather spend tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars perpetuating their own faulty DNA rather than adopt a needy child. These sociopaths have no moral inhibitions against destructive research or abortion. Children aren't real people to them, they are merely objects of achievement.

13 posted on 06/21/2007 9:35:57 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Leftover” human beings.

Beyond sick and disgusting.

(Feeling a bit better, may be back on the job tomorrow)


14 posted on 06/21/2007 10:09:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It’s like the Nazi doctors rejoicing over the extra Jews they could kill. This is horrible. All these people killed for what has been unsuccessful research. I pray it stays that way for the sake of the children.


15 posted on 06/21/2007 11:00:25 PM PDT by Pinkbell (I'm a Christian, a conservative and a Republican, in that order. - Mike Pence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; TChris

Once a couple/person accepts the commoditization of embryo aged humans, there is no longer a person until the parents say there is ... in their utilitarian minds. Just ask any person who has had in vitro fert to bring a child into the world ... they will twist their mind into pretzels to justify the commoditization of their embryonic children.


16 posted on 06/21/2007 11:04:16 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wicket

Liberal? I dunno, look at Orrin Hatch who favors the utility of cannibalizing these very young humans who he doesn’t believe are human beings until implanted in a womb.


17 posted on 06/21/2007 11:08:39 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
“Leftover” human beings.

"Eugenics", I think, is the correct term. Is Mum's "choice" going to be strained through future scientific collanders?

The Brave New World is cowardice - not to mention ghoulish.

18 posted on 06/21/2007 11:15:29 PM PDT by IslandJeff (Half-baked cookies in the oven, half-baked people on my bus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Just ask any person who has had in vitro fert to bring a child into the world ... they will twist their mind into pretzels to justify the commoditization of their embryonic children.

Well, I don't need to, since I am one.

It's not like that at all.

19 posted on 06/21/2007 11:49:55 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TChris

If this is too personal, please forgive the prying and just disregard the question: having used in vitro fert, would you ‘donate’ any ‘extra embryos’ leftover from the process, or would you allow only a snowflake adoption process for these embryos (if there are any left from your procedures)?


20 posted on 06/21/2007 11:55:44 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson