Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid: Supreme Court Decision On School Desegregation Is Judicial Activism
Democrats.Senate.Gov ^

Posted on 06/28/2007 9:54:13 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

June 28, 2007 Reid: Supreme Court Decision On School Desegregation Is Judicial Activism

Washington, DC—Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada made the following statement today in response to the Supreme Court’s decision on school desegregation:

"The Supreme Court decision in the school desegregation cases is appalling. Ever since Brown v. Board of Education, it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools. Today's decision turns Brown upside down and ignores decades of constitutional history. If this isn't judicial activism, I don't know what is."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: busing; democrats; judiciary; reid; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2007 9:54:17 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Two edged sword Mr. Hairy.

"The Supreme Court decision in the school desegregation cases is appalling. Ever since Brown v. Board of Education, it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools. Today's decision turns Brown upside down and ignores decades of constitutional history. If this isn't judicial activism, I don't know what is."

Well, before Brown vs Board it was also settled law. Pendulmns swing.

2 posted on 06/28/2007 9:56:04 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If this isn't judicial activism, I don't know what is."

It isn't and you are right, you don't.

3 posted on 06/28/2007 9:56:04 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I buy gas for my SUV with the Carbon Offsets I sell on Ebay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Two edged sword Mr. Hairy.

"The Supreme Court decision in the school desegregation cases is appalling. Ever since Brown v. Board of Education, it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools. Today's decision turns Brown upside down and ignores decades of constitutional history. If this isn't judicial activism, I don't know what is."

Well, before Brown vs Board it was also settled law. Pendulmns swing.

4 posted on 06/28/2007 9:56:06 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hip hip Hooray?
For the verdict and that Reid is Po’ed.


5 posted on 06/28/2007 9:56:09 AM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools

A Harry...would you mind showing where it is written?


6 posted on 06/28/2007 9:56:20 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
the Constitution requires racially mixed schools.

< Geico caveman voice > Uh...WHAT? < /Geico caveman voice >

7 posted on 06/28/2007 9:56:46 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’d say Reid’s desperately attempting to change the topic from the obvious one - his inability to get anything done as SML.

Today’s vote demonstrated this in spades.


8 posted on 06/28/2007 9:57:48 AM PDT by Badeye ("In 2 weeks, I join the list of UNEMPLOYED". ...Goldi-Lox (karma comes around))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Poor Harry, he’s having a really bad day ô¿ô¬


9 posted on 06/28/2007 9:58:26 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Reid: “Ever since Brown v. Board of Education, it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools.”

Reid is an idiot.


10 posted on 06/28/2007 9:58:46 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Harry, wake up Harry...this is just a small correction of one example of the outrageous judicial activism by liberal usurpers.


11 posted on 06/28/2007 9:59:27 AM PDT by OriginalIntent (Undo the ACLU revision of the Constitution. If you agree with the ACLU revisions, you are a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

tisk tisk Harry. I honestly can not figure out if you are stupid or ignorant.
Either way the people of Nevada need to be brought to bare over their choice of senator.


12 posted on 06/28/2007 9:59:38 AM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Ever since Brown v. Board of Education, it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools.

Huh? I thought that Brown said that schools could not be legally segregated by race. Ironically, IIRC, Linda Brown was forced to be bused to an all black school instead of being allowed to go to the local school which was for whites only.

The opinion is very long, but did anymore read Thomas' concurrence where Seattle, one of the school district's fighting for race-based school selection in the name of diversity, nevertheless approved an all-black charter school called the "African-American Academy"?

13 posted on 06/28/2007 10:00:38 AM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder if the word is being circulated that another one or two of the libs left on the court are about to bow out and Dingy Harry is starting to set the stage to oppose more conservative nominees.


14 posted on 06/28/2007 10:00:54 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Brown went too far in letting bureaucrats get away from actually educating, rather than being a play thing for social experimentation.


15 posted on 06/28/2007 10:01:25 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: svcw

nybody have a citation to the case in question????


16 posted on 06/28/2007 10:01:57 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in a 1995 ruling (quoting Justice Sandra Day O’Connor): “At the heart of the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection lies the simple command that government must treat citizens as individuals, not as components of a racial class.”


17 posted on 06/28/2007 10:02:02 AM PDT by philled (The Democrat's 'new vision' for Iraq looks a lot like Pol Pot wearing a turban...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Ever since Brown v. Board of Education, it has been settled law that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools.”

What an ignorant turd. Brown just said that the government can’t enforce segregation. It was later judicial activism that came up with all the enforced integration plans.


18 posted on 06/28/2007 10:03:19 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

” that the Constitution requires racially mixed schools.”

What? Harry has been hanging out at the casinos again.

This idiot is either very stupid, or he thinks Americans are very stupid, or both.

Hey Harry, can you read? You habla that ingles?

Unfeakin believable. This fool really is dangerous.


19 posted on 06/28/2007 10:03:23 AM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is great, we’ve gat a twofer.

The SCOTUS ruling and Dingy Harry is upset.

With the Senate vote it makes it an historic day!


20 posted on 06/28/2007 10:05:04 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson