Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fairness Doctrine hammered 309-115
The Hill ^ | June 28, 2007 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 06/28/2007 3:54:50 PM PDT by rface

At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity......“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton.......”

The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday ( June 28, 2007 )to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using taxpayer dollars to impose the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters who feature conservative radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

By a vote of 309-115, lawmakers amended the Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill to bar the FCC from requiring broadcasters to balance conservative content with liberal programming such as Air America.

The vote count was partly a testament to the influence that radio hosts wield in many congressional districts.

It was also a rebuke to Democratic senators and policy experts who have voiced support this week for regulating talk radio.

House Democrats argued that it was merely a Republican political stunt because there is little danger of the FCC restricting conservative radio while George W. Bush is president.

Republicans counter that they are worried about new regulations if a Democrat wins the White House in 2008.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on Tuesday that the government should revive the Fairness Doctrine, a policy crafted in 1929 that required broadcasters to balance political content with different points of view.

“It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine,” he said. “I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they’re in a better position to make a decision.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, said this week that she would review the constitutional and legal issues involved in re-establishing the doctrine.

Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), the Democratic Party’s 2004 presidential nominee, also said recently that the Fairness Doctrine should return.

In 1985 the FCC discarded the policy after deciding that it restricted journalistic freedom and “actually inhibit[ed] the presentation of controversial issues of public importance to the detriment of the public and in degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists,” according to a Congressional Research Service report.

Thursday, the House firmly rejected the prospect of requiring balanced views on talk radio.

Before the passage of the amendment, which he sponsored, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), a former full-time radio host, forecast a big majority and took a shot at the Senate, saying: “This House will say what some in the other body are not saying, that we believe in freedom on the airwaves. We reject the doctrines of the past that would have this federal government manage political speech on the public airwaves.”

Republican Study Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) and Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) also sponsored the legislation.

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would slash profits and pressure radio executives to scale back on conservative programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from government regulators. Opponents of the Fairness Doctrine argue that radio stations would suffer financially if forced to air liberal as well as conservative programs because liberal talk radio has not proven popular or profitable. For example, Air America, liberals’ answer to “The Rush Limbaugh Show” and Michael Medved, filed for bankruptcy in October.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said Thursday that listeners should be able to decide if they want to hear different political arguments.

“The best way is to let the judgment of the American people decide, and they can decide with their finger,” Boehner said. “[People] can turn it off or they can turn it on. They can go to their computer and read it on the Internet.”

Flake added: “Rather than having the government regulate what people can say, we should let the market decide what people want to hear. That’s precisely why the Fairness Doctrine was abandoned, and that’s why it ought not to be revived.”

At the end of Thursday’s debate, Democratic House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (Wis.) agreed with Republicans that the government should not regulate conservative radio hosts such as Limbaugh and Hannity.

“We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now,” he said. “Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, and I would hate to see them gain an ounce of credibility by being forced by a government agency or anybody else to moderate their views enough that they might become modestly influential or respected.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; censorship; congress; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; firstamendment; govwatch; silenceamerica; talkradio; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: italianquaker

Don’t forget the SCOTUS decision. 0-4 for the Rats. Drowning Rats that is... :}


21 posted on 06/28/2007 4:09:05 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Anyone but Hitlery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rface

I’ll support the Fairness Doctrine if it applies to the MY Times and other liberal rags.


22 posted on 06/28/2007 4:09:11 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
The House powns the Senate.

Listen to the Senators squeal: "eek, eek, eek".

23 posted on 06/28/2007 4:09:38 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

I still hope someday we can balance the slant on NPR where they use my tax dollars to stream DNC talking points.


24 posted on 06/28/2007 4:11:07 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

It seems that Congess needs a whole lot of “rebuking” these days....


25 posted on 06/28/2007 4:11:50 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Sen. George Voinovich was quoted as saying, “Fairness what?”
26 posted on 06/28/2007 4:12:07 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (To make a conservative angry, lie to them. To make a liberal angry, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

HALLELUJAH!


27 posted on 06/28/2007 4:12:33 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Naturally, the communists among us want to stifle the truth. Thankfully, the House of Representatives voted for an informed and free public in today's America. BRAVO!!!!

But there are still those in congress who wish to silence those who speak for our freedom, so we must be ever vigilant.

28 posted on 06/28/2007 4:13:56 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

But this isn’t over. Is it?

No, of course not. They’ll be back.


29 posted on 06/28/2007 4:14:22 PM PDT by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Wait a Minute!!!!! What about this Pelosi Conference call earlier today!!!?????

Taylor Mrsh asked about the Fairness Doctrine and Rep. Spence's amendment to prohibit enforcement of the fairness doctrine on conservative talk radio. Speaker Pelosi said this will not come to the floor, that she is solidly behind bringing back the Fairness Doctrine.

30 posted on 06/28/2007 4:15:02 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

And this Obey is helping to run things in Congress? He doesn’t have a clue.

-—Oh — wait — he’s part of the gov’t, isn’t he!


31 posted on 06/28/2007 4:15:50 PM PDT by Exit148 (Founder of the Loose Change Club. Every nickle and dime counts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
WOO-HOO!!!
32 posted on 06/28/2007 4:17:21 PM PDT by golas1964 (Bush = Quack the Tongue-tied RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday ( June 28, 2007 )to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using taxpayer dollars to impose the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters who feature conservative radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

So much better than a bloody revolution.

But what do i do with all this tar and feathers now? Craigslist?

33 posted on 06/28/2007 4:18:51 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Man talk about a black day for the left!


34 posted on 06/28/2007 4:19:53 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

They is running ascared!


35 posted on 06/28/2007 4:20:16 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rface

Good. I hope that the Democrats finally realise that even when they’re in the majority, they’re still the minority. Maybe the next time the Republicans control Congress, the Dems will think twice before prefacing their stupid policy proposals with the words “The American people want...”.


36 posted on 06/28/2007 4:21:05 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Now more popular than Congress!* *According to a new RasMESSen Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Dick Durbin before he dicks us.


37 posted on 06/28/2007 4:21:17 PM PDT by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Yeah I thought this was going to be the next upcoming big battle. Well so much for that.


38 posted on 06/28/2007 4:21:26 PM PDT by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

“Maybe the Washington politicians are getting the message that the American people are mad as hell and we still own this nation.”

In agreement. Worst Congress I have observed in years. Began with Pelosi trotting herself off to Syria to have a tea party and chat with Syrian leadership. Gone down hill since that time.

Time for new blood and new representation in Washington. Say, “Adios amigos.”


39 posted on 06/28/2007 4:22:01 PM PDT by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rface
“Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton.......”

No way. Larry King isn't interviewing Rush or Sean. And Oprah is likely lining up a Paris interview as well.

40 posted on 06/28/2007 4:22:30 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson