To: Anti-Hillary
Come think of it she still lawyer RIGHT why don’t she testify if she have nothing to hide tesitify
2 posted on
07/11/2007 1:03:24 PM PDT by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: Anti-Hillary
Bush to Conyers.... “Kiss my lily white...”
3 posted on
07/11/2007 1:03:54 PM PDT by
Anti-Hillary
(Anyone but Hitlery)
To: Anti-Hillary
Attorney -Client privilege........
4 posted on
07/11/2007 1:04:52 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
To: Anti-Hillary
When will Clinton come forward and explain why he fired all of the federal prosecutors?
To: Anti-Hillary
This circus is yet another waste of taxpayer dollars.
To: Anti-Hillary
After the Scooter Libby trial, no republican should ever testify unless its to plead the 5th. It’s just another conservative/witch hunt.
9 posted on
07/11/2007 1:07:43 PM PDT by
subterfuge
(Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
To: Anti-Hillary
So is Jorge going to pardon Ms. Miers should she be cited for contempt of Congress?
Heck, he'd have to grant a blanket pardon to all of us for that :)
12 posted on
07/11/2007 1:12:16 PM PDT by
pnh102
To: Anti-Hillary
Even though I’m sure President Bush is getting good legal advice, I wish it was Ted Olsen giving it to him.
23 posted on
07/11/2007 1:27:26 PM PDT by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Anti-Hillary
Does she still work for Bush?
My ex-bosses have no say in any damn thing I do.
26 posted on
07/11/2007 1:31:43 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
To: Anti-Hillary
Don’t forget. They were fired for failing to prosecute vote fraud cases.
27 posted on
07/11/2007 1:32:07 PM PDT by
Abogado
(The great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearances, as though they are realities.)
To: Anti-Hillary
I don’t see what’s so difficult about this. Executive privilege is a constitutional issue having to do with separation of powers. On top of that, there is the matter of lawyer-client privilege.
The headline is misleading. Bush is not ordering Miers not to testify, he is confirming that she cannot be subpoenaed to testify because congress lacks the jurisdiction to do it.
If congress doesn’t like it, they can go shovel sand.
38 posted on
07/11/2007 2:15:23 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Anti-Hillary
The down side of Bush’s staff being forced to testify is that the president could no longer trust the integrity of the information. Who is going to advise the president if they can be forced to appear before congress and reveal the conversation? Think Scooter Libby.
48 posted on
07/11/2007 3:41:59 PM PDT by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson