Restarting the Iran ping. On or off ping list.
Posted on 07/13/2007 10:27:35 PM PDT by freedom44
July 13, 2007 (RFE/RL) -- The United Nations, Western governments, and human-rights groups have strongly condemned the stoning of an alleged adulterer that was carried out in Iran last week.
Meanwhile, reports from Iran say the country's judiciary has launched a probe into the judge who ordered that Jafar Kiani be stoned to death.
The grim sentence of Jafar Kiani has prompted a wave of international condemnation and also reactions by human-rights activists and others inside Iran.
Rights activists believe that in order to prevent such incidents in the future and to root out stoning in Iran the sentence should be removed from Iranian laws.
Kiani was stoned to death on July 5 in a small village in northern Iran. He had been convicted of adultery and had spent the past 11 years in prison.
UN Condemnation
Many have described his stoning as "inhumane" and "barbaric."
UN human rights chief Louise Arbour condemned the execution, saying that "stoning is in clear violation of international law." She called on Iran to stop the stoning of Kiani's partner, Mokarameh Ebrahimi, who is reportedly in jail with the couple's two children.
A top dissident cleric in Iran told Radio Farda that Kiani's stoning was carried out against Islamic principles.
According to Islamic laws applied in Iran, the punishment for adultery is death by stoning. It is allowed to be proved through evidence such as a confession or a "judge's knowledge."
Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, who is a prominent Iranian source of emulation, said in a written statement faxed in response to an inquiry by Radio Farda that adultery is very difficult to prove under Islamic laws. He says adultery can be proven only if it is witnessed by four people who had seen the act with their own eyes, adding that such a thing is almost impossible.
Damaging Islam's Reputation?
Montazeri also writes that if the accused retracts his or her confession then that person should be able to go free.
He adds that if "at a certain time and location" the implementation of the sentence would damage Islam's reputation then it should be prevented. The dissident ayatollah added that, in fact, stoning sentences are a tool to create fear and prevent people from committing sin.
Kiani's stoning was carried out despite a reported 2002 moratorium on stoning by the head of Iran's judiciary, Mahmud Hashemi Shahrudi.
His execution also came two weeks after international and domestic pressure made local officials delay carrying out the sentence against him and his partner, Ebrahimi.
Ebrahimi's sentence has reportedly been suspended.
Judge Investigated
On July 11, Iran's ISNA news agency quoted an unnamed official from the judiciary as saying that the judges' disciplinary court will investigate the action carried out by the local judge, which was contrary to the order of judiciary chief Shahrudi.
Rights activists believe that in order to prevent such incidents in the future and to root out stoning in Iran the sentence should be removed from Iranian laws.
Among them is Iranian Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi, who in an interview with Radio Farda expressed serious concern over the stoning of Kiani.
"We've been telling the judiciary for years now that if the respected head of the judiciary is against carrying out stoning sentences then the solution is very simple: he should write two sentences, propose it as a law to the parliament and -- since the parliament is totally on his side -- it will adopt it," she said.
But the judiciary has so far ignored such demands and activists say in the past five years stoning sentences have been issued to alleged adulterers. One case of a stoning of a man and a woman was reported in 2006.
Online Reaction
Kiani's stoning has also led to strong reactions among visitors to the Radio Farda website.
Mohammad Bagher Abbasi from Bushehr writes that proving that adultery has taken place is "impossible" under Islamic laws. Therefore, he said, whenever someone is executed by stoning there should be no doubt that Islam was not respected.
Mohammad from Esfahan believes that the implementation of Islamic sentences can prevent evil and mischief.
An unnamed visitor has written that Kiani's stoning proves that Iranian "mullahs" are worse than Taliban members and that if they are not confronted they could ban women from studying.
Kamran from Tehran describes stoning as inhumane and cruel, yet he adds that the leaders of Iran should be stoned because he believes "they are infected with sin."
Most of the visitors have, however, written in their postings that the practice of stoning does not belong in today's world.
I believe stoning a true adulterer is fine.
It was good enough for God and His people.
So was animal sacrifice...
It was good enough for God and His people.
I am a pure conservative--a Christian
"He who is without sin, cast the first stone."
Brutal 7th century psychotic primitives, armed with nuclear missles, ruled by mad mullahs.
Here is a nice summary from Answers.com:
According to the Gospel of John, the Pharisees, in an attempt to discredit Jesus, brought a woman charged with adultery before him. Then they reminded Jesus that adultery was punishable by stoning under Mosaic law and challenged him to judge the woman so that they might then accuse him of disobeying the law. Jesus thought for a moment and then replied, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.” The people crowded around him were so touched by their own consciences that they departed. When Jesus found himself alone with the woman, he asked her who were her accusers. She replied, “No man, lord.” Jesus then said, “Neither do I condemn thee: go and sin no more.”
I'm sure the armchair theologians will be along to parse ever word any time now.
You sir are an asshole. Got your sheet or turban on tonight?
You are not a conservative so don't pretend so.
"'Christian' with sociopathic tendencies"
There, fixed it for you.
ON
are you serious clark?
I don’t think OT law can be appealed to here (that was established for the Jews for God’s very specific purpose for them... you can’t claim a right to anything that was given to them unless it’s given to you independently).
However, for other reasons, I would still weigh in in favor of it. Rape, murder, treason, and adultery are IMHO the four capital offenses, and should be treated as such.
My big issue with the Muslim conception of that is that, all too off, the man gets off scott free. I’m afraid I will have to applaud this event as a possible step away from that intolerable brand misogynism.
I guess Clinton is not going there anytime soon.
Here, here, on Amnesty International.
OK, so now go find some one without sin to cast the first stone.....
Rape murder and treason certainly merit strong punishment. But to stone someone to death puts us on a par with the barbarians we are trying to stop. As to stoning someone for adultery is beyond the pale. Give the adulterer to a divorce attorney. That's punishment enough.
Poor soul! I would have been stoned more than (##) times by now! :(
Bill Clinton has got to be feeling Kiani's pain.
“stoning a true adulterer is fine.”
Remind me not to look to you as a “conservative mind.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.