Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mother of the Homosexual Movement - Evelyn Hooker PhD
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | July 16, 2007 | Hilary White

Posted on 07/16/2007 10:19:10 PM PDT by monomaniac

July 16, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Although few have heard of her outside the movement she helped to shape, the psychologist Evelyn Hooker's contributions to the advance of the homosexual political movement puts her in an historical class with Margaret Sanger, the foundress of Planned Parenthood and institutionalized abortion, and Alfred Kinsey the "father" of the sexual revolution.

Hooker, a professor of psychology at the University of California at Los Angeles for 30 years, is credited in the medical and psychological community, and most especially amongst homosexual political activists, with establishing that there is no measurable psychological difference between heterosexual and homosexual men. Her work introduced and developed the idea that homosexuality, far from being a mental disorder, is merely a normal minority variant on human sexuality.

Hooker's influential study on the issue, first published in 1957 in the Journal of Projective Techniques, was and still is presented as proof that homosexual activity is normal and as valid a lifestyle as heterosexuality. The first of several studies that Hooker published, the 1957 study served as a foundation for most of the homosexual movement's political and philosophical orthodoxies, including the assertion that any objection to the agenda is born from an irrational fear, since labelled "homophobia."

Born in 1907, Hooker lived long enough to receive the 1991 Award for Distinguished Contribution to Psychology in the Public Interest, from the American Psychological Association. The citation on the award read, "Her pioneering study, published in 1957 ... provided empirical evidence that normal homosexuals existed, and supported the radical idea then emerging that homosexuality is within the normal range of human behavior."

A report for the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality by researcher Jeffrey B. Satinover, cites Evelyn Hooker as "more than anyone else" the one whose work is responsible for normalizing homosexuality.

Satinover writes that Hooker's work has helped the homosexual movement - in keeping with the Marxist theories from which it came - to convince judicial and legislative bodies such as the US Supreme Court that homosexuality comprises an oppressed "class" whose rights have been trampled by irrational prejudice.

Hooker's work itself, however, was the product of a deliberate effort by homosexual activists to bring forward particular, pre-arranged outcomes, an approach that precludes scientific objectivity.

While teaching at UCLA in the late 1940's, Hooker fell in with a group of homosexuals and the newly formed activist organization, the Mattachine Society. Founded by leading thinker and member of the US communist party, Harry Hay, the Mattachine Society members convinced Hooker to embark on a research study of homosexuality on their behalf in order to advance the movement.

The study's subjects were selected entirely by the Mattachine Society, a group that Hooker herself admitted in the report had "as its stated purpose the development of a homosexual ethic...". In the same section she concedes the possibility that homosexuals are indeed pathological. The inadequacy of her methodology was acknowledged by the Journal of Projective Techniques that published it.

In the study, "The adjustment of the male overt homosexual", Hooker administered three standard personality tests to two groups of 30 men, one homosexual and screened by the Mattachine Society and the other heterosexual. Despite the fact that the purpose of the study was ostensibly to examine the possibility of mental instability in homosexuals, individuals who showed signs of mental instability were removed from the groups, which further predetermined the study's conclusion.

As with many other such "groundbreaking" studies seminal to the sexual revolution however, although Hooker's research has been criticised, and for all practical purposes debunked, the movement she helped to launch has not slowed.

To this day, the Hooker study is the only paper referenced in detail on the main website of the American Psychological Association in its discussion of Gay and Lesbian issues. It was one of the two upon which, in 1973, the APA decided to remove homosexuality from the list of psychological disorders. It was the one study discussed in the APA's brief in 2003 in the Lawrence v. Texas case that struck down the criminal prohibition of homosexual sodomy in Texas.

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

American Psychological Association Pressured to Ban Reparative Therapy http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07071103.html


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apa; celebrateperversity; communist; culturewar; evelynhooker; feminist; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; junkscience; kinsey; liberalagenda; mattachinesociety; pseudoscience; psychology; reich; satinover; sexpositiveagenda; sodomy; themattachinesociety

1 posted on 07/16/2007 10:19:14 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

You are on a roll this morning. Bookmark for later printing.


2 posted on 07/16/2007 10:39:27 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
...there is no measurable psychological difference between heterosexual and homosexual men.

That just proves the study of psychology is at best a joke.

3 posted on 07/16/2007 11:14:21 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Hey! Must be a devil between us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

the foundress of Planned Parenthood

Since when has the word ‘founder’ become gender specific?


4 posted on 07/17/2007 12:36:50 AM PDT by Paisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

The science is not useless, but she made a mockery of it.


5 posted on 07/17/2007 1:22:24 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paisan

There’s something about women when they become evil.


6 posted on 07/17/2007 1:24:05 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

She knew what political conclusion she wanted to draw and she used science as an excuse. Lot of that still going on today.


7 posted on 07/17/2007 1:28:53 AM PDT by gunsofaugust (Ignore the bishops who choose to ignore the laws that interfere with their leftist political goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsofaugust

Liars figure and figures lie. “Professing to wise, they became fools.”


8 posted on 07/17/2007 1:52:38 AM PDT by Judges Gone Wild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

That this doctor’s research was bogus is no surprise. I’ve known a number of queers, and NONE of them was even remotely mentally normal. Some of them were darned smart, but they were smart nutcases.


9 posted on 07/17/2007 3:19:41 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
there is no measurable psychological difference between heterosexual and homosexual men.

Everyone now knows that to be blatantly false. Why, gay men are far superior - more intelligent, sensitive, clean, classy, and able to relate to women. At least that what movies and TV teach us nowadays.
10 posted on 07/17/2007 3:28:03 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
There is a movie coming out with Adam Sandler called “Chuck and Larry”.

Without having ever seen the movie, I can tell you what the plot will be like.

Two heterosexual guys want to save money by sharing a household, so they engage in a sham civil union saying they are homosexuals.

They will pretend to be homosexuals to avoid having their “union” invalidated and will trot out every stereotype with a humorous bent.

They will generally treat homosexuals like props and targets for their vicious humor.

Near the end of the movie, they will discover how wrong they were about homosexuals, that homosexuals...er...I mean “gays” have real needs and rights, both financial and emotional, and that society has been robbing them all these years of those financial and emotional rights. In the course of their quest, they will fall in with homosexual couples and those who sympathize with them, and realize “They are people too...”

They will get misty eyed, and will probably attend a real wedding between a homosexual couple, and one of them will catch the bouquet.

Most likely.

11 posted on 07/17/2007 3:53:22 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
...psychological difference between heterosexual and homosexual men.

How many straight guys like to be hairdressers, interior designers, etc.? How many straight guys think like women?

12 posted on 07/17/2007 3:54:33 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paisan

It became gender-specific just for this occasion to be used as a subtle put down of this awful woman.


13 posted on 07/17/2007 4:58:19 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
"Her pioneering study, published in 1957 ... provided empirical evidence that normal homosexuals existed, and supported the radical idea then emerging that homosexuality is within the normal range of human behavior."

Sin is within the bounds of normal human behavior too. (These sins happen to be abnormal.)

14 posted on 07/17/2007 5:05:49 AM PDT by ChessExpert (Mohamed was not a moderate Muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Sanger, Kinsey, and Hooker — the Satanic trinity.


15 posted on 07/17/2007 5:11:20 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

No, it proves that someone with an agenda can select their sample and design their research to reach the conclusion that they are looking for. Unfortunately, scientists can do the same thing. The problem is not with the nature of the science but the bias and lack of integrity of the scientist.


16 posted on 07/17/2007 6:03:47 AM PDT by srmorton (Choose Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BabaOreally; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

One place you can read the Hooker study is here.

Dr Satinover discusses the many problems with the Hooker study here: The Trojan Couch. You'll have to scroll down to page 7 to read his comments on the Hooker study.

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

17 posted on 07/17/2007 6:33:17 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
While teaching at UCLA in the late 1940's, Hooker fell in with a group of homosexuals and the newly formed activist organization, the Mattachine Society. Founded by leading thinker and member of the US communist party, Harry Hay, the Mattachine Society members convinced Hooker to embark on a research study of homosexuality on their behalf in order to advance the movement.

The study's subjects were selected entirely by the Mattachine Society, a group that Hooker herself admitted in the report had "as its stated purpose the development of a homosexual ethic..."

Satan is good at what he does.

18 posted on 07/17/2007 7:27:09 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
At least that what movies and TV teach us nowadays.

HGTV used to one of the "safe channels" on cable for us. Now I can't watch more than a few shows before they're fixing up Bill and Todd's pad. Sheesh.

19 posted on 07/17/2007 7:29:08 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
No, it proves that someone with an agenda can select their sample and design their research to reach the conclusion that they are looking for. Unfortunately, scientists can do the same thing. The problem is not with the nature of the science but the bias and lack of integrity of the scientist.

I could be wrong, but I believe that the point GATOR NAVY was trying to make was that, in a respectable discipline, one would hope that such a fraud would be identified and summarily disregarded, rather than enshrined as is the case here.

20 posted on 07/17/2007 7:29:33 AM PDT by Ursine_East_Facing_North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Are there any lesbian Hookers?


21 posted on 07/17/2007 7:29:36 AM PDT by melancholy (Quiz: name one country, other than the USA, that doesn't control its borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Evelyn Hooker:


22 posted on 07/17/2007 7:34:34 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac; Lexington Green
Credit to Lexington Green for posting this quote on another unrelated thread a few days ago:

“By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. ... With it you can erase our enemies as insects... Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. ... And bring to Earth, through Communism, the greatest peace Man has ever known.” — Lavrenti Beria, Lenin University, in a 1933 address to a group of American/Marxist Psychology Students

23 posted on 07/17/2007 7:36:02 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

“HGTV used to one of the “safe channels” on cable for us.”

In the last few months, the wife and I have seen nothing but gay guy couples on HGTV. What happened to it?


24 posted on 07/17/2007 7:44:33 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ursine_East_Facing_North

It seemed to me that he was dismissing ALL of psychology with his statement, but you could be right. The article said that the study itself has been discredited, but the effect of the study still persists. Just like the evidence AGAINST global warming, the message never seems to make it into the MSM.


25 posted on 07/17/2007 8:53:36 AM PDT by srmorton (Choose Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Hooker’s work itself, however, was the product of a deliberate effort by homosexual activists to bring forward particular, pre-arranged outcomes, an approach that precludes scientific objectivity.

While teaching at UCLA in the late 1940’s, Hooker fell in with a group of homosexuals and the newly formed activist organization, the Mattachine Society. Founded by leading thinker and member of the US communist party, Harry Hay, the Mattachine Society members convinced Hooker to embark on a research study of homosexuality on their behalf in order to advance the movement.

Gay communists.....(chuckle)


26 posted on 07/17/2007 8:56:18 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

She looks like a dike with ISSUES.


27 posted on 07/17/2007 9:24:37 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nmh

It’s interesting how much we can see of the inside on the outside.


28 posted on 07/17/2007 9:30:11 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: trisham

“It’s interesting how much we can see of the inside on the outside.”

In this situation the “inside” has already been exposed - she’s got “issues”. Her outer appearance emphasizes it.


29 posted on 07/17/2007 9:33:38 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: gunsofaugust

today even insurance companies like e-surnace are using junk science to sell their products.


30 posted on 07/17/2007 9:39:47 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

I never met a homosexual who didn’t eventually exhibit whiny, self rightious, self centered behavior; and when they don’t like something they are the ones spewing the venom and hate. That is a common psycho issue in the entire group.


31 posted on 07/17/2007 9:05:41 PM PDT by john6 (http://schenectady-politics-prose-crits.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson