[Grizzled Bear]

You should never argue with an idiot. They just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I hope this helps.

;-)

[shield]

bfl

[coloradan]

The people want their government's resources to fund universal health care and to repair lives

The government doesn't have ANY resources except those wrested from its subjects. If people won't pay for their own healthcare, why should we trust them to choose the best people to buy them healthcare on their behalf?

[Rodney King]

Don’t waste your time.

The short answer is this: The GOP went back on all its promises. The Dems won the congress on certain promises, and has already gone back on them.

Therefore, just about everybody hates the Congress.

[tsowellfan]

Send him this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpcMIZrCT8E

[REDWOOD99]

If this is a true Chicago sports website then the only answer is a Louisville Slugger to the back of the head. It’s the Chicago Way!

[irishtenor]

YOU KNOW that:
Clinton said there was weapons of mass destruction
The UN said ...
Congress said ...
All of the intelligence agencies said ...
France said ...
Russia said ...
Hussein said ...

So, where did Bush lie?
Besides, lying isn’t an impeachable offence, otherwise ALL polititians would be impeached.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Easy response to the moonbat... “WTF does this diatribe have to do with sports ?”

[operation clinton cleanup]

Do they discuss sports on this sports website? ;^)

[eric_da_grate]

Bush’s fault....Next topic.

[NonLinear]

He is wrong on so many fundamental levels, that it is nearly incomprehensible that he would ever understand any argument you make.

[uptoolate]

First of all, let’s separate the House from Senate bodies. The Democrats hold a decisive majority to act and pass on legislation reflecting the will of the American public as expressed by last November’s voting. On the Senate side, the gains gave the Democrats a majority, but one that does not have (as does the House) the force to carry out the will expressed by the electorate. In short, moving legislation coming from the House, faces an uphill battle, as the reality to pass legislation with simple majorities and beat back a Bush veto with the necessary 67 votes required, well, that hasn’t happened, and most likely, won’t happen, given the entrenched attitude about protecting Bush.

The answer to your question is found in his opening presumption.

[Rembrandt]

I presume you’re familiar with the term “idiot savant.” I wouldn’t personally waste my time arguing with the clown.

[stylin19a]

time show him the invisible tin-foil hat he’s wearin

[Gay State Conservative]

Don’t bother.Nothing short of a lobotomy will clear this clown’s mind.

[endthematrix]

Just reply, "Karl is that you?

[tryon1ja]

Sounds like the person has a mind like a steel trap. No matter what you have to say in reply, it will not mean a thing and will fall on deaf ears. There are those who have ears and do not hear and have eyes and do not see.

Why even bother to waste your time to answer someone who will never be affected by your answer. Use your time and energy for something more constructive. Pray for the person and let it go at that.

[rockinqsranch]

FWIW I wouldn’t bother responding to the idiot. He’s obviously engulfed in Liberal sewage with no way out, and you cannot help him. Pathetic.

[Go Gordon]

Reply: After reading your response, it is clear that your hatred for Bush and your ignorance of facts severely deminishes your ability to think logically. Rather than trying to educate you, I'll pray for you. I pray that somewhere in the near future, you set aside your hatred and reduce your ignorance by doing unbiased research and fact finding.

Once you have done that, we'll be able to communicate from a common base. Until then, I'm afraid further discussion with you would be a waste of both our time.God Bless...

[Postman]

I suspect that a reply would be a total waste of your time and that the only easy entry into its head would be with a .357 bullet. Despite the advice, if you are tempted to reply, you might focus on its claims to speak for “the people”. In my experience, “the people” usually consists of the Lib and its nearby friends, not any normal people that anyone might know.