Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(RON PAUL opposes) Administration Plan to Subsidize China’s Nuclear Industry
Human Events ^ | 06/06/2007 | Timothy Carney

Posted on 07/22/2007 2:02:07 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian

Administration Poised to Subsidize China’s Nuclear Industry
by Timothy P. Carney

A Japanese-owned company is building nuclear power plants for Communist China, and the Bush administration is ready to use U.S. taxpayer dollars to subsidize the deal to the tune of $5 billion. Although China’s government-owned nuclear industry has a long record of illegal nuclear deals with Iran and Pakistan, administration officials say the technology is not transferable to nuclear weapons, and that the subsidy will create 5,000 jobs in Pennsylvania.

The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im) is a federal agency that subsidizes U.S. exports by lending taxpayer money to foreign buyers (such as the Chinese government), or guaranteeing private loans, so that the foreign buyer can purchase U.S. goods.

Westinghouse Electric is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Japanese company Toshiba. Westinghouse manufactures the AP 1000 -- a new model of nuclear power generator -- in Monroeville, Pa.

In February 2005, Ex-Im’s board of directors granted preliminary approval for a $5 billion subsidy -- an unspecified combination of loans and guarantees -- to the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) as a way of aiding Westinghouse’s bid for the contract (a French company and a Russian company were also competing for the contract.)

This year, the Chinese government awarded the contract to Westinghouse, bringing the record subsidy closer to reality, although the preliminary approval does not guarantee Ex-Im will provide financing. A Westinghouse spokesman told HUMAN EVENTS the company was in the process of applying for Ex-Im financing. Ex-Im spokesman Phil Cogan told HUMAN EVENTS that while a preliminary commitment is by no means a promise by Ex-Im, it indicates that “this is the kind of thing” Ex-Im would subsidize.

Congressional critics from both ends of the spectrum, including Senator Bernie Sanders (I.-Vt.) and Republican Representatives Ron Paul (Tex.), Jeff Fortenberry (Neb.), and Ed Royce (Calif.), have resisted this deal.

For the critics, the deal is problematic on at least three fronts. First, China’s state-owned nuclear industry has a long history of illegal nuclear weapons proliferation, and this subsidy enriches that very industry. Second, some of the jobs generated by this record subsidy deal will not be in the U.S. Finally, aiding China’s nuclear power industry could boost its military capabilities including its nuclear submarine programs.

Rewarding Proliferators

The CNNC is the branch of the Chinese government that manages both nuclear weapons and nuclear power. In recent months, CNNC and other state agencies founded the State Nuclear Power Technology Company (SNPTC). SNPTC, entirely owned by the Chinese government, is now the official purchaser of the nuclear reactors from Westinghouse.

CNNC is a known serial proliferator of nuclear weapons materials. In the late 1990s, U.S. intelligence agencies found that the CNNC had sold 5,000 ring magnets to Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan Research Laboratory. Later, the CIA found that the CNNC sold Pakistan high-temperature furnaces. Both the furnaces and the ring magnets are crucial tools used in enriching uranium to produce fissionable -- i.e., weapons grade -- uranium. Shortly after these sales, Pakistan tested its first nuclear weapon.

In 2004, A.Q. Khan, the Pakistani scientist on the buying end of the CNNC’s sales, was arrested for selling centrifuge materials to Libya. Khan is also known to have aided the nuclear weapons programs of North Korea and Iran. CNNC has, on at least two occasions, had dealings with Iran’s nuclear weapons program, but it is not clear if China has ever actually executed a sale of nuclear weapons materials to Iran.

American Jobs?

Westinghouse and Ex-Im officials have defended this subsidy by pointing out that without it, China would still build the nuclear power plants, but in collaboration with the Russians or the French. By greasing the skids for the Westinghouse contract with its preliminary commitment in 2005, Ex-Im has helped make work for 5,000 manufacturing workers in Monroeville, Pa. In April, however, Westinghouse announced that portions of the power plants would be built in South Korea and other parts in China. Ex-Im cannot finance an export unless most of the goods are made in the U.S.

Westinghouse and the Bush administration point out, however, that if these cutting-edge reactors do well in China, it would spur domestic and world-wide business for Westinghouse, making more jobs in Pennsylvania.

Helping China’s Military?

In late May, Representatives Christopher Smith (R.-N.J.), Diane Watson (D.-Calif.), Fortenberry, and Royce, asked Secretary of Defense Robert Gates in a letter whether the sale could boost China’s military capabilities.

Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center said that there are reasons to worry about providing China with this technology. “You’re building an infrastructure that can be used and retooled to help out in [China’s] naval reactor sector -- and they do want this for nuclear subs,” the Christian Science Monitor quoted Sokolski.

Last year, during the debate on reauthorizing Ex-Im, the House passed by a 331-to-114 vote an amendment by Representatives Paul and Sanders that would have blocked a subsidy for this deal. The measure, however, was not in the final bill.

As of Tuesday morning, Ex-Im had not yet received an application from Westinghouse or any of its partners with regard to the sale. Sanders, Paul, or Fortenberry will likely act once Ex-Im receives the application, and possibly hold hearings on the deal, which would be the largest subsidy in Ex-Im history.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; energy; geopolitics; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: BnBlFlag
He cannot stop them? And just as interesting, why do they glom on to his writings? Why too do so many despots and America haters and anti-Israel dictators want Ron Paul? I surmise that he’s either terminally naive about America’s enemies or he’s willing to let them have their way with the world. As such, I cannot understand the enthusiasm for him here at FreeRepublic, a pro-American website.
61 posted on 07/22/2007 3:17:51 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Okay, try the link below. They're supporters of his on their website. Does that mean he wants their support? I don't know. Has he rejected it? I don't think so. And perhaps this is all coincidental. But if it quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/paul_banned.html

62 posted on 07/22/2007 3:20:54 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
"It is not the government’s place to do either."

Agreed, but if they were going to LOAN ( as another poster noted ) $1,000,000 per job created, would it not be even better to instead LOAN, say, $500,000 for maybe 10 years to the person who would have otherwise been employed by a giant company?

63 posted on 07/22/2007 3:21:01 PM PDT by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre; BnBlFlag; BlackbirdSST
I surmise that he’s either terminally naive about America’s enemies or he’s willing to let them have their way with the world.

You mean like letting the Chinese have their way with our nuclear technology?

Oh, wait, I'm sorry -- Ron Paul is against that, and George Bush is for it, therefore it must be the right thing to do.

"Everything that George Bush does is true and righteous altogether. For daring to question the all-holy George Bush and suggesting that a given Foreign Policy will actually make us less safe, Ron Paul is just a blame-America-defeatist-traitor-coward moonbat." I already posted your script at the beginning of the thread. We've heard it already.

64 posted on 07/22/2007 3:21:47 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Crazy. Let the Japanese subsidize it.


65 posted on 07/22/2007 3:23:13 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gb63

Both courses of action are unConstitutional. I can’t pick either one.


66 posted on 07/22/2007 3:25:14 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Westinghouse is essentially an autonomous division of Toshiba. The payments will be made directly to Westinghouse, as is the case for all business that Westinghouse is involved in.

The deal with the Chinese was significantly completed BEFORE the Japanese bought Westinghouse from BNFL (a British company). This deal was initiated when Westinghouse was a division of a BRITISH company.


67 posted on 07/22/2007 3:26:50 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Yeah, Ron Paul’s a real American hero. You can bash Bush all you want, but he’s one thing Ron Paul will never be: President of the United States of America.


68 posted on 07/22/2007 3:28:42 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

That costs one million dollars per job.
That is a waste of our money.
This man’s power has gone to his head.


69 posted on 07/22/2007 3:29:53 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
I doubt he endorses anything they support that doesn't fit in with his own message. It's possible they both agree on the First Amendment, for example.
70 posted on 07/22/2007 3:30:25 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre; George W. Bush
Ron Paul: Principled Saviour of the nation, or weird dilettante with crypto Nazi pals?

This has already been dealt with here. You already knew that, didn't you?

71 posted on 07/22/2007 3:31:45 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Oh, you are wrong my friend. Ron Paul will be the next President of the United States of America. You will be proud you supported him.


72 posted on 07/22/2007 3:31:56 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg; gb63
I think that "gb63" is illustrating absurdity by being absurd.

It does say something crazy about this deal that we could cut the price in HALF just by loaning $500,000 bucks per each to those 5,000 Americans to start their own businesses.

Not that the Federal Government should, but it is telling.

73 posted on 07/22/2007 3:32:10 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

All paulette threads deserve a buffoon alert


74 posted on 07/22/2007 3:32:37 PM PDT by italianquaker (When will pelosi ask congressman ellison to apologize for his 9-11 remarks?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

George Bush is the traitor to our troops, our nation, and our Constitution. He sent them to a war in Iraq we had no business starting, and cut back their numbers in Afghanistan.


75 posted on 07/22/2007 3:33:37 PM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Is it just me or do his supporters get a little worked up about this weirdo? Is it a cult now?


76 posted on 07/22/2007 3:33:39 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Yeah, Ron Paul’s a real American hero. You can bash Bush all you want, but he’s one thing Ron Paul will never be: President of the United States of America.

Ron Paul will never be as awful a President of the United States of America as "Amnesty Jorge" El Bush has been, that's for sure.

77 posted on 07/22/2007 3:34:10 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

You are correct. I was pointing out the absurdity of the amount per worker and how it could have been spent.


78 posted on 07/22/2007 3:35:09 PM PDT by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
The Paulites scrambling to find issues that put RP in a good light -- after he's stabbed our troops in the back by voting with the worst of the leftist in the House

Trying to bring American soldiers home so they don't get killed is "stab(bing) our troops in the back" and makes him "a traitor to our troops." The anti-Paulites just get nuttier and nuttier.

79 posted on 07/22/2007 3:35:17 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
What is Ron Paul’s position on the Patriot Act? And what is his position on holding Al Qaeda terrorists at Guantanamo?

I know he is against the Patriot act.
If he supports the Geneva conventions, then that means immediate execution of all who are held at gitmo.

80 posted on 07/22/2007 3:38:03 PM PDT by JoinJuniorAchievement (“ I am a Veteran, I support Ron Paul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson