Posted on 07/22/2007 2:02:07 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
Our number one problem is China. It is our number one problem because Bush and his twin brother Bill have put business interest before national security. Ron Paul offered several ways to deal with the W.O.T. that are Constitutional and effective. As well he supported going after Bin Ladden but of course you don't dare mention that.
But the real issue is nobody and I mean nobody gives Da Crowned Bush advice. Why do you think Bush placed so many Yes Men around making policy him who are Idiots! That makes Bush the biggest threat to having a dictatorship since FDR himself. Bush's own words calling the United States Constitution "A ****ed piece of paper" say it. If Ron Paul said that you would be demanding his removal from office.
Bollocks. There are MANY Conservative Issues which are MORE IMPORTANT than trying to referee an Islamic Civil War in Iraq: Abortion, Illegal Immigration, Gun Control, Domestic Socialism... Abortion kills at least one 9-11 worth of Unborn Americans EVERY DAY. Illegal Immigrants murder at least one 9-11 worth of American Citizens EVERY YEAR. And, of course, Gun Control killed 200 Million+ human beings in the last century alone, and Creeping Socialism is its economic adjunct. Every one of these classically Conservatives issues is FAR more important than a monomaniacal focus on trying to keep Shi-ite Terrorists from killing Sunni Terrorists in a god-forsaken hell-hole 7,000 miles away.
I don’t know if he agrees with them. I have no problem denouncing communists, Nazis, skin heads, or any other group of haters. If my writings were appearing in their publications, I’d make damn sure everyone knew I had nothing in common with them. Is that too much to ask? If you associate with people (as he appears to do), why would it be my responsibility to save his reputation? Surely, that’s his job. Maybe then the “coincidence” that his foreign policy is anti-Zionist wouldn’t seem like it was animated by some baser instincts. He’d just be anti-Israel because he’s a man of principle. After all, it’s not in the constitution that we’ll help Israel.
Yeah, next time I'm about to get mugged, I'll just follow the Bush Plan --- I'll slit my own throat, and hand them my wallet.
I see no reason to indulge them with the publicity. That would be counterproductive, IMHO.
trying to keep Shi-ite Terrorists from killing Sunni Terrorists in a god-forsaken hell-hole 7,000 miles awayThat's exactly what I mean when I say sticking your head in the sand. You just proved my point completely.
They want to kill you. And me. And your family. And mine.
Wake up. Smell the Turkish Coffee. It's time to fight or die.
Bush thinks China and Mexico are our friends.
5000 jobs in PA.
5 Billion of my tax dollars.
1 nuclear reactor in China.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to give the 5 billion dollars to the 5000 unemployed in Penn?
I don’t think they would mind taking the money and not having to work.
He’s regularly published in their paper, yet he should ignore them. That sounds convenient now that he is on the national stage.
Westinghouse employee here (although I’m in services, not new plants).
A couple of things to note.
1. The discussion revolves around a LOAN, not a gift. I’m not entirely familiar with the finances, but I do believe that it mainly serves as a vehicle to make payments from the communists to an American firm. So all of the Freepers who are clever with the math, please correct your statements that this would be like a LOAN of $1M to 5000 Americans.
2. The article is correct in that a large fraction of the work will be farmed out to South Korea. That’s because the United States lost all capabilities to make large forgings after orders of nuke plants died after Three Mile Island. The United States simply doesn’t have the capability to make the larger components.
3. Although I’m not real thrilled that we’re building nukes for a communist country, the article is correct in that it was going to happen anyway. In any case, the big benefit for this contract with the Chinese is that it will allow Westinghouse to staff-up in anticipation of a large number of domestic nuke plant orders. We’ll build them plants that are significantly safer than what the Russians would have built...and by the time we’re done, the next generation of plants will be available.
4. The article implies that we’re giving vital military knowledge away. The Chinese already have the bomb. The deal has been reviewed by the department of defense, and they didn’t have a problem with it.
I take it this is your first week out since graduating from Attack Dog School? You didn't get your money's worth. Lame. Blackbird.
Read and then comment please.
It is not the government’s place top do either.
top do should have been “to do”
“Ron Paul’s friends at American Free Press.......”
Paul does not copyright his writings and they can be published by anyone. He does not write “for” them.
Oh, it’s a civil war. I see...
Actually, as the article notes, it's a Japanese-owned firm.
So, basically, we're subsidizing the transfer of nuclear technology to China, so that the same Japanese Company which sold our submarine-propulsion technology to Soviet Russia can make big profits.
Brilliant.
Are you absolutely sure Ron Paul "writes for" Carto's publication? Or is that from something you read here posted by a Paul hater?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.