Skip to comments.
University Expected to Fire Controversial Professor Today [Ward Churchill.........]
CNS News ^
Posted on 07/24/2007 5:10:51 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
adios........
To: Sub-Driver
Now there’s swift justice. They did it in under ten years.
2
posted on
07/24/2007 5:12:24 AM PDT
by
samtheman
To: samtheman
3
posted on
07/24/2007 5:13:36 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Sub-Driver
This guy is a fraud; his degrees are faked and his “works” plagiarized. He deserves to be sacked, not for the garbage he spouts, but for being a charlatan.
4
posted on
07/24/2007 5:16:00 AM PDT
by
indcons
(I support Mitt's 5th position on abortion, 8th position on gun rights, and 7th position on amnesty.)
To: Sub-Driver
Not holding my breath here. I’ll believe it when I see it. The board’s original recommendation was not to fire this creep. Why should they change their minds now?
5
posted on
07/24/2007 5:17:02 AM PDT
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: Sub-Driver
I’ll believe it when I see it. This moron has more lives than a dozen cats. He should have been fired his very first day on the job.
6
posted on
07/24/2007 5:18:13 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(If I eat right, don't smoke and exercise, I might live long enough to see the last Baby Boomer die.)
To: mollynme
I agree...I’ll believe it when I see it. They don’t want the ACLU and other lawsuits to contend with. What a farce.
7
posted on
07/24/2007 5:21:59 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: Sub-Driver
8
posted on
07/24/2007 5:23:12 AM PDT
by
RayStacy
To: gridlock
That would have been one day too late.
To: Sub-Driver
Oh Happy Day! Let his lawyer sue - in then end he's being fired for bogus academic credentials, not because of his vile speech.
10
posted on
07/24/2007 5:32:41 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Sub-Driver
According to the Denver Post, Churchill's supporters are planning to show their support at an afternoon rally.Just how wacky does one have to be to be a "Ward Churchill supporter"?
11
posted on
07/24/2007 5:32:51 AM PDT
by
PBRSTREETGANG
(Apparently my former party considers me an "ugly nativist".)
To: Sub-Driver
Should have happened a long time ago. Even though the academics were not incensed by his 9-11 comments, they should have tared and feathered him for his fraudulent academic record and outright plagiarism.
12
posted on
07/24/2007 5:33:28 AM PDT
by
The Great RJ
("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: Sub-Driver
"Ward Churchill will be fired, and Wednesday, I'll be filing a lawsuit" over free-speech rights," I don't recall anything about "free speech" including forgery, plagiarism, fraud and lying on your job application........
13
posted on
07/24/2007 5:33:45 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
To: samtheman
And this is only about the 50th article I’ve read over the past year that says he’s going to be fired “tomorrow” or “today.”
To: mollynme
You are confused. The Privilege & Tenure Committee recommended that Churchill be suspended and demoted, not fired. Hank Brown has recommended that he be fired. Today’s decision will be rendered by the Governing Board. Two separate entities.
To: Dudoight
Who is paying his legal fees? I’m sure the cheap so-and-so has some left wing outfit springing to his defense.
16
posted on
07/24/2007 5:41:24 AM PDT
by
Melchior
To: Sub-Driver
There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth in moonbat lairs from Berkeley to Peshawar, but the rest of us can celebrate a well-deserved boot to this charlatan’s backside.
17
posted on
07/24/2007 5:44:26 AM PDT
by
atomic conspiracy
(Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
To: Sub-Driver
It’s about time this miserable slime ball got fired. He’s been poisoning our youth’s minds? for far too long. Phony moron.
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Just how wacky does one have to be to be a "Ward Churchill supporter"?You must first assert (not believe) that plagiarism by a socialist professor is "protected speech".
That's consistent with the idea that theft by a socialist dictator is "protected appropriation".
19
posted on
07/24/2007 5:57:03 AM PDT
by
angkor
To: Sub-Driver
He’s already been hired to clean Hitlery’s bidet!
20
posted on
07/24/2007 5:58:44 AM PDT
by
Doc Savage
("You couldn't tame me, but you taught me.................")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson