Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surprising new species of light-harvesting bacterium discovered in Yellowstone
physorg.com (Penn state) ^ | July 26, 2007

Posted on 07/26/2007 10:14:22 PM PDT by Rick_Michael

In the hot springs of Yellowstone National Park, a team of researchers has discovered a novel bacterium that transforms light into chemical energy.

_______________________________________________________

In the hot springs of Yellowstone National Park, a team of researchers has discovered a novel bacterium that transforms light into chemical energy........

Remarkably, the new genus and species Cab. thermophilum also belongs to a new phylum, Acidobacteria. The discovery marks only the third time in the past 100 years that a new bacterial phylum has been added to the list of those with chlorophyll-producing members. Although chlorophyll-producing bacteria are so abundant that they perform half the photosynthesis on Earth, only 5 of the 25 major groups, or phyla, of bacteria previously were known to contain members with this ability......

"Finding a previously unknown, chlorophyll-producing microbe is the discovery of a lifetime for someone who has studied bacterial photosynthesis for as long as I have (35 years)," says Bryant. "I wouldn't have been as excited if I had reached into that mat and pulled out a gold nugget the size of my fist!" He adds, "I am really grateful to Dave Ward for the chance to work with him and his students in the park and to visit Montana frequently. Our collaboration is a great example of how science really becomes exciting when scientists from different disciplines interact."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: energy
I'm curious if this brings any long-term implications....eventually?
1 posted on 07/26/2007 10:14:26 PM PDT by Rick_Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Wonderful article. Possibly more useful for discovering life on other planets. Photosynthesis is just magical - but it contributes to Global Warming, apparently - so synthetic photosynthesis is like Kryptonite.

Great story.


2 posted on 07/26/2007 10:19:58 PM PDT by IslandJeff (Jeremiah 2:14-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

Let the Martian terraforming begin.


3 posted on 07/26/2007 11:25:15 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

My natural science background is terribly lacking. Besides water (which likely exists there), what are the “heavy lifting” components of a functional atmosphere? CO-2, for certain, but those little green buggers will eat that stuff up.

How about Nitrogen?


4 posted on 07/26/2007 11:31:24 PM PDT by IslandJeff (Jeremiah 2:14-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

Well, Nitrogen makes up most of our atmosphere, but actually what is needed on Mars is more CO2 to warm things up. If we could get it warm enough, the planet would release more CO2, and eventually we could function there...it will still take immense amounts of time to create sufficient oxygen to breath. Warming it up is stage one, so super greenhouse gasses like Methane are needed.


5 posted on 07/26/2007 11:40:16 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Turning light into gas is nothing; Congress has been transforming darkness into gas for decades.


6 posted on 07/26/2007 11:46:19 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Great as an abstract exercise.

What’s the gravity threshold that keeps any native gases from just dissipating into space? I would think native Martian volcanism would throw a few ‘organic’ components out - unless, indeed, it is a cold, dead place.

A pity we won’t live to see it.


7 posted on 07/26/2007 11:52:32 PM PDT by IslandJeff (Jeremiah 2:14-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

ping


8 posted on 07/27/2007 12:10:27 AM PDT by pandoraou812 ( zero tolerance to the will of Allah ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack

If lack of magnetic field results in solar wind stripping of atmosphere, why didn’t earth lose its atmosphere every time its magnetic field went through a switch of polarity?


10 posted on 07/27/2007 2:59:40 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
If lack of magnetic field results in solar wind stripping of atmosphere, why didn’t earth lose its atmosphere every time its magnetic field went through a switch of polarity?

I suspect because it has been a switch rather than a loss.

I would like to know though whether scientists (good, reputable, real "scientific scientists", not government grant global warming goobers) think there will be transient effects on our enviroment when the next big swap happens.

-Yossarian, who models electromagnetic effects on chips. Way different scale from the earth, but the same idea!

11 posted on 07/27/2007 3:05:51 AM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack
As I understand it, part of the problem is Mar’s core began to solidify, which eliminated it’s magnetic field. Without the magnetic field, the solar wind is able to strip away much of Mar’s atmosphere, and it’s insulating effects. Apparently that Aurora Borealis is more than just beautiful.

Yikes...from that perspective, hypothetically, terraforming towards the end of producing a viable atmosphere is likely impossible, isn't it?

14 posted on 07/27/2007 4:45:30 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Bump for later.


15 posted on 07/27/2007 8:42:37 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack
LOL!!!!
17 posted on 07/28/2007 9:26:49 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson