I object to having the heading changed unfairly and inaccurately [”kook heckler”]. The woman was not a heckler. She did not begin “protesting” until AFTER she was being forcibly removed for doing nothing wrong.
What is wrong with Fred Thompson and his handlers? That’s the issue. To remove this woman solely for asking him about his CFR connection shows cowardice on his part, due to the fact that his CFR connection can’t stand up to public scrutiny.
That’s what this article is about—and whoever changed the title intentionally distorted the essence of the article.
Watch the YouTube video, and decide for yourself.
boo hoo
The CFR has been instrumental in laying the groundwork for the NAU and related initiatives such as the Security and Prosperity Partnership.
Thompson responded, “I didn’t know they were up to that . . . 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Uh.....sorry freddie......I don’t believe you.
What is wrong with Fred Thompson and his handlers?
Nothing. It’s good to see an authoritarian with some backbone.
decided. Thanks for encouraging me to watch it.
>I object to having the heading changed unfairly
you might be surprised at how little I care.
>What is wrong with Fred Thompson and his handlers? That’s the issue.
Nothing. That is the answer.
I watched the video,there was no trouble until she started acting up.
Fred was answering the question and she kept rudely interupting with her comments.
Sounds like a "kook heckler" to me.
I dunno, she rattled off the kook stuff pretty quickly. She definitely didn't think about it for too long. And, we only have Her point of view video..we don't know what else was going on there from a different perspective, or before she the tape started rolling, or elsewhere in the building...
I say "Kook Heckler". Sorry.
“I object to having the heading changed unfairly and inaccurately [”kook heckler”].”
As would I. It has been REPEATEDLY pointed out by Free Republic moderators that titles for threads MUST be kept original.
“...What is wrong with Fred Thompson and his handlers?...”
He’s the goon he’s accused of being. Hillary must be proud of him.
No. They only started to remove her when she started acting like a nutcase and spouting off the “9-11 was an inside job” nonsense.
I did watch it, and have decided. The only complaints I have about Fred’s response is that A-he didn’t address the NAU portion of the question (by stating that no plans for such a union exist) and then call her out for being a kook about the tower 7 comment.
She got removed for being RUDE. It is obvious.