Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surveillance Cameras Win Broad Support
ABC News ^ | July 29, 2007 | MICHELLE LIRTZMAN

Posted on 07/29/2007 5:40:02 PM PDT by ECM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: ECM

Americans hate freedom.


21 posted on 07/29/2007 6:17:51 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I’m in favor of it.

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
22 posted on 07/29/2007 6:19:23 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: supercat

No, the first step should be to up the level of surveillance on each and every politician, at every level of government. Put them under the microscope 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.


23 posted on 07/29/2007 6:19:43 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: AFreeBird

“....up the level of surveillance on each and every politician”

Certainly would encourage term limits and foster “public service”........


25 posted on 07/29/2007 6:22:43 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: supercat
I'd say the first step should be to maximize the level of surveillance performed on law-enforcement personnel..

The first thing that happens to folks recording cops on voice or video is they get beat up. Then they get arrested.

26 posted on 07/29/2007 6:22:49 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Americans hate freedom.

It's worse than that. They fear it.

27 posted on 07/29/2007 6:23:57 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ECM

They like this idea ... but freaked out when google didn’t their webcam street shots ??


28 posted on 07/29/2007 6:26:26 PM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

Do you really believe those figures? Or, does someone have an agenda to push? I’m not sure what to believe - but it’s usually a safe bet to assume some sort of scam.


29 posted on 07/29/2007 6:29:54 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I’m in favor of it. If you want privacy, stay in your house.

It is really amazing that some people that come here to discuss freedom and liberty, would say such things.

Fine, lets assign a little UAV camera drone to follow you around 24/7. Every where you go, and everything you do will be recorded and digested for possible violations of; what ever the crime du jour (subject to change w/out notice) as defined by the enlightened elites and masters in DC and your local Statehouse.

Yes siree, step right up and get your government mandated tracking chip, so the drones can pick your single and track your movements.

Hey, if you have nothing to hide, right?

Think I'm being overly dramatic? Hey, you want to give them an inch; you can damn sure bet they'll take a mile.

30 posted on 07/29/2007 6:31:12 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
I'm beginning to think so.

It never takes long for the "If you have nothing to hide, why object to constant surveillance?" crowd to show up.

31 posted on 07/29/2007 6:31:21 PM PDT by Malacoda (A day without a pi$$ed-off muslim is like a day without sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Americans hate freedom.

Every time I pass by one of those red light surveillance cameras, I start thinking of the best way to take them out without being caught. So far my best scenario involves some sort of grappling hook.
32 posted on 07/29/2007 6:35:52 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ECM
Americans, by nearly a 3-to-1 margin, support the increased use of surveillance cameras...

It appears that Americans, by a 3-to-1 margin, are dumber than fenceposts. I can now understand how Hitler gained popularity in Germany in the '30's - people, and especially poorly-informed people are lemmings.

33 posted on 07/29/2007 6:38:44 PM PDT by meyer (It's the entitlements, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malacoda
Some people object because the are so fudging ugly! lol
34 posted on 07/29/2007 6:41:32 PM PDT by verity (Muhammed and Harry Reid are Dirt Bags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
Every time I pass by one of those red light surveillance cameras, I start thinking of the best way to take them out without being caught. So far my best scenario involves some sort of grappling hook.

BTW, one thing I've wondered about those: if someone runs a red light before the opposing signal has turned green, does the system delay the opposing signal? If not, how can one argue with a straight face that the cameras are for "safety"?

35 posted on 07/29/2007 6:42:29 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

That clears it up nicely....


36 posted on 07/29/2007 6:42:56 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
“Do you really believe those figures? Or, does someone have an agenda to push? I’m not sure what to believe - but it’s usually a safe bet to assume some sort of scam.”

I have no idea if the figures are correct, but I wouldn’t be surprised. Too many Americans can’t see past the end of their noses when it comes to public policy.

I do know that red-light cameras are being implemented across the country with little/no objection from the public despite the scandals associated with their use. And, I know that the numbers of surveillance cameras already located in the UK can hardly be counted, with little public opposition. Of course, much of the public isn’t literate enough to comprehend “1984”, so it’s to be expected.

37 posted on 07/29/2007 6:48:19 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ECM

Sheep begging to be led to the slaughter.


38 posted on 07/29/2007 6:51:58 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Can't even get them to pee in a bottle...


Hell, teddy filled the bottle with Chivas...


4th amendment only applies to what we own, not what we do out in public. That said, let's start with testing the congress and senate first. When they have nothing to hide, they can monitor my actions a little closer. Better yet, put the spotlight on Johnny Sutton...
39 posted on 07/29/2007 6:53:20 PM PDT by Issaquahking (Duncan Hunter for president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ECM

I’m no longer surprised by my fellow Americans. By the time they realize they have given the government too much power and too many tools, it’ll be too late. It won’t affect us, but the grandchildren of our grandchildren, they’ll look back and blame us (they’ll have to do it privately of course).


40 posted on 07/29/2007 6:55:51 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson