Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election Should Be All About The Supreme Court for Social Conservatives
Townhalll ^ | 6/30/07 | John Stemberger

Posted on 07/31/2007 4:51:01 AM PDT by Valin

The Upcoming Presidential Election Should Be All About The Supreme Court for Social Conservatives

Big Trouble

We are in big trouble. Whether you consider the historical cycle of presidential elections; the results of the 2006 election; the mood of the country; or the unfavorable ratings of the President, the odds are that conservatives will have our heads handed to us on a silver platter in 2008. Unless our movement gets its act together quickly and gets on the same page, one thing is for sure-- we are in big trouble.

No Perfect Candidate

Many conservatives are frustrated by the field of candidates running for president--and understandably so. There is no perfect candidate in 2008. There is no Ronald Reagan. Even the best of conservative candidates (announced and unannounced) have political warts. We have hawks with liberal views on social issues, recent conservative converts with questionable policy histories, and social conservatives with histories of personal moral failure and others just not able to mount a viable campaign or raise money. Whether the problems are policy, personal or political in nature, all the 2008 choices have considerable weaknesses. Folks, welcome to the fallen world in which we live. As Francis Schaeffer used to say, "Things are not as they ought to be..." Actually, there was one perfect candidate-but we crucified Him 2000 years ago.

Principled Pragmatism

As principled citizens how should we now respond? Whine and complain? Protest and not vote? Let a liberal win and hope to come back in four years? None of these options are the highest or most principled expressions of our citizenship. As social conservatives, we should always wrestle with how to reconcile the tension between principle and pragmatism. If we support only what appear to be front runner candidates, we will sell our souls to be political insiders. If we support only the purist long shot candidates, we risk foolishly forfeiting any realistic opportunity to affect public policy through political change.

All The Marbles Are For the United States Supreme Court

Most of all of the great culture war issues of our day can be directly traced to bad decisions by the United States Supreme Court. Consider this: duly elected legislative branches of government are not ultimately responsible for abortion on demand, legalizing same sex marriage, protecting pornography as free speech, removing faith symbols from the public square, and undermining private property rights. Instead, these moral and social ills are the responsibility of unelected, unaccountable members of the federal judiciary who refuse to recognize their limited and restrained role as jurists and insist upon acting as social change agents.

Changing of the Guard

Between age and ailing health, most legal observers believe we are all but certain to see two, maybe three, US Supreme Court justices resign between 2009 and 2012. Since most of these justices are liberals, the 5-4 majority our opponents have enjoyed could be either dismantled or reaffirmed for the next couple of decades. In the final analysis, the 2008 election presents us with the most significant window of opportunity to change the direction of the court (and hence the culture war) that will occur over the next 15-25 years.

The Bottom Line

There are really only two equally important questions conservatives should ask about the upcoming presidential election: 1) Which candidate is most likely to pick the best judges AND 2) Which candidate is most likely to win both the primary and general elections. Every other issue is just window dressing. If we all stick together, work hard to reach a consensus and use these questions to think about the election, we might have a chance to elect a conservative who could produce historical pro-life and pro-family victories in battles many of us have been fighting all of our lives. But, if we all act independently and support our favorite sounding, best looking, or even "most conservative" candidate, well, then--did I mention? We are in big trouble.

John Stemberger is an attorney in Orlando, Florida who serves as the President and General Counsel of the Florida Family Policy Council. The mission of the FFPC is to strengthen Florida's families through public policy research, issues research, and grassroots advocacy. The FFPC is associated with Dr. James Dobson and Focus on the Family.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christianvote; electionpresident; elections; ffpc; fredthompson; issues; johnstemberger; judicialnominees; republicans; rfr; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2007 4:51:05 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

In other words: Get behind Fred!!


2 posted on 07/31/2007 4:52:56 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
1) Which candidate is most likely to pick the best judges AND 2) Which candidate is most likely to win both the primary and general elections.

This article doesn't get around the problem that we all disagree on the answer to both questions.
3 posted on 07/31/2007 4:55:47 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Yes, Supreme Court judge nominations are extremely important, however I don’t consider the WOT “windowdressing”.


4 posted on 07/31/2007 4:56:17 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (PUT AMERICA AHEAD --- VOTE FOR FRED!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Many conservatives are frustrated by the field of candidates

Save it, bud. I'm not voting for RINOs.

5 posted on 07/31/2007 4:58:38 AM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Which candidate is most likely to pick the best judges

Hunter or Paul. period.

6 posted on 07/31/2007 4:59:04 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Of late I’ve come to understand those who obess on immigration, as I am the same on the GWOT/Iraq.


7 posted on 07/31/2007 5:00:30 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I absolutely disagree.

It would be nice if social issues were at the top of the heap, but they aren't. The only thing that counts right now is what we are going to do to overcome the Muslim menace.

ML/NJ

8 posted on 07/31/2007 5:03:19 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Sheriff Joe is the way to go.


9 posted on 07/31/2007 5:06:19 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Best of luck


10 posted on 07/31/2007 5:08:56 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I am not frustrated with our candidates, there are three or four good ones I would be happy to support. And I am excited about our chances to get a real conservative who could whip the over-hyped Clinton/Obama.


11 posted on 07/31/2007 5:10:21 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

This is spot on!!!!! I have been sounding this alarm for years now, the libs know the power is in the courts, and have been using the courts to issue mandates to the unwashed masses...we cannot make changes to our government without the supreme court, period. If another vacancy occurs on the court right now, there will be no replacement confirmed. This is because conservatives chose to stay home last election. We need the senate and the white house one more time to make the changes. This WILL be the last election I hold my nose on, but without the court, all other battles are pointless....


12 posted on 07/31/2007 5:11:34 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Nothin' from Nothin' leaves Nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

yeah I know.


13 posted on 07/31/2007 5:17:50 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The FairTax and the North American Union are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Damn straight!

We sure showed them in 2006! To hell with SCOTUS, we’ll fix that in the 2030 election.


14 posted on 07/31/2007 5:19:19 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete
Save it, bud. I'm not voting for RINOs.

Same here. If Giuliani gets the nod, I'm voting 3rd party or write in.

15 posted on 07/31/2007 5:25:02 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Run, Fred run! I will send my donation as soon as you announce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I absolutely disagree.
It would be nice if social issues were at the top of the heap, but they aren’t. The only thing that counts right now is what we are going to do to overcome the Muslim menace.

_________________________________________________________

My first thought was that the article made a lot of sense, and mostly it does, but: what good are socially conservative judges if we have to face Mecca 4 times a day and pray or lose our heads. The WOT has to be our first consideration. The Muslims keep saying that we are fighting the crusades and I say they are right. This is a holy war. It is not only a holy war, for these Muslims want world domination I think their stone age religion is only an excuse and tool to use for domination. I will not be forced to pray to the Muslim god, I will lose my head first.

All that being said I am not anxious to lose my head. We need to win! We need to win big! If we do this right it may keep this nonsense religion in check for another couple hundred years. During that time we can work on what is right for society until The Lord comes and takes control.

Which candidates can win the WOT? That is the real question we should be asking ourselves. I think all that are running right now for the Republican primary except McCain could do a creditable job. There is a lot not to like about a couple of them. Some have no management experience, some have flip/flopped and some sound naive but they all sound committed to the WOT. I may not like the nominee but this election cycle I will work for whomever wins the primary, this is war after all.

16 posted on 07/31/2007 5:25:36 AM PDT by JAKraig (Joseph Kraig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Immigration, WOT, will top the list for me. Open borders will destroy all of the issues on the table and give Democrats the upper hand forever.

Republicans mimicking Democrats just to win, would no longer be representation for me.

It would be likely that a candidate, tough on immigration, would be also for good SCOTUS justices.

17 posted on 07/31/2007 5:25:45 AM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

yeah, but thanks to bush boy

there will be almost certainly a democrap president 2008.

bush boy was too self absorbed to come out and defend his policies

after abu ghraib and guantanamo
.
to the american public.

i have tv-moron neighbors that were foaming-at-the-mouth angry at bush after abu ghraib and guantanamo.

democrap tv media knows how to control the masses.

the “support our troops” bumper stickers are almost gone.

i live in a republican u.s. congressional and state assembly district and almost no republican supports bush boy.


18 posted on 07/31/2007 5:25:49 AM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Election Should Be All About The Supreme Court for Social Conservatives

The perfect reason to avoid Giuliani.

19 posted on 07/31/2007 5:25:59 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

President Hillary Clinton thanks you.


20 posted on 07/31/2007 5:28:51 AM PDT by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson