Skip to comments.Hillary Clinton's SUPPRESSED Thesis finally on line in its entirety
Posted on 08/01/2007 11:30:59 AM PDT by AndrewWalden
A PDF copy of Hillary Rodhams senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning. it is titled:
There is only one fight an analysis of the Alinsky Model
Although I have no loving wife to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote, I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process of thesis-writing.
We have not had a chance to review and will do so today. Regardless, we wanted to post this as soon as possible to share with everyone. Hillary is running for President and it is important to know what she really believes. This document was hidden from public view during her husbands presidency -= an apparent favor to the Clintons fromt he President of the university - and interest in it fell when the Clintons left office. Now with Hillary a top Democratic candidate for President the importance of this document has frothed to the surface again....
(Excerpt) Read more at gopublius.com ...
And, I'm wondering if it's possible to know this for certain.
Considering the propensity of Hillary to obfuscate the worst stuff, I can't help but wonder if some of the most America-hating subversive material might somehow have been expunged or softened.
Such obfuscation of the truth is her M.O., n'est ce pas?
I’m a bit disappointed it hasn’t been made available in an MS Word format.
Downloaded for future perusal - after I get down with all the Chicago Outfit stuff from the Family Secrets mob trial now ongoing.
US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald (yep that Fitzgerald) has 'prolly' put the final nail in the Mob's coffin. Capone, Nitti, Accardo, Giancana, et al, must be spinning in their graves.
Haven't heard a peep outta Vince or McDoogle have ya? It's the Arkancide way.
Sorry, I thought when you were explaining your own evolution you were inferring that she too could have changed. She has changed no more that marx himself ever did. He just became more of what he already was.
The American people are going to love the Cliff notes version of Hilda’s `Mein Kampf’—I’m sure there are plenty of quotable quotes!
Let’s get crackin’....
Well liz..... here it is.
The Thesis. Thinking of you, I delayed reading it till after the ping.i
Well then let her publicly disavow it now, and tell us specifically what is different in her thinking.
I can hear the MSM and the Dems --"this was so long ago, why should it matter?". Funny, how they didn't think that George Bush supposedly being AWOL from the National Guard (which turned out to be a falsehood, in any case) was too old to bring up during an election.
And he had already been in office for four years, when they tried to sandbag him!
Not what I was expecting from a genius. Or even an average student at Wellesley.
She'd have to acknowledge having espoused radical ideas to begin with. A former racist isn't given a "pass" for a change of heart/mind. Should a "former" Marxist when she is still a fellow traveler of the agitators in the streets?
My comment wasw a sarcastic reference to the Dan Rather fiasco over a fake National guard document exposed by Buckhead.
We know what we have seen, we know Hitleralys goals. Now lets become as knowledgeable as we can. Marxist philosophy cost a hundred million lives in the last century. Whats next a good guess would be our children. I personally need to learn a lot more do be an effective teacher for those struggle to spend the time for the many reasons.Start with Alinsky and his goals and how he would manipulate and control the mass and control the Government.Lets all work together and energize our friends. God Bless our Freedom and our love for the Almighty.
“In order to organize, you must first polarize. People think of controversy as negative; they think consensus is better. But to organize you need a Bull Connor or a Jim Clark.” Hillary quoting Alinsky.
Don't know, you'd need to run it through a character recognition program to convert it to digital text and word search that.
HILLARY’s active supporting of HO CHI MINH’s Communist North Vietnam takeover of a then Free South Vietnam during the Vietnam War... sadly brought us:
Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education (SLAVE LABOR) Camp
What Price is there for the still Free (that’s US) to pay now, I wonder,
...in a new time of war in a new century with our own Freedom directly at stake this time around...
...with a President HILLARY sitting behind an Oval Office desk..?
LOL, I remember the good old bleeding heart days.
My thesis was a critical look at the Black Panther Party and their significant and positive impact on their communties.
My outrage over the murder of Fred Hampton alone earned me an A from my hippie Professor.
Obviously, I have abandoned those beliefs long ago.
But Hitlery, Shrillary, Billary is still the same old beast.
Kudos to you for the rapid post of HRC’s long hidden thesis.
Downloaded and copies wing to those that need to read it.
Thanks again for help in ripping away the veil.
Well, it sure would have made things easier if you had posted a DIRECT downloadable URL to obtain it.
Here it is, in pdf format:
(Note: this is not a clickable hotlink. You must copy and then paste in your browser, per the request of the website).
Get it while you can.
Was this faxed from a Kinkos?
Actually, after reading it, I don’t think it will hurt her, but rather help her. I do find her comparison of Alinsky to Debs, Walt Whitman, and MLK to be instructive.
MS Word wasn't invented yet.
Maybe you mean that the difference is that Alinsky-style "change" (espoused by Hillary) involves using the irresistable power of government to force people to behave in a "government-approved" manner. That 's both radical and totalitarian.
The Kerry team tried to suppress his book too:
A copy will cost you $28-393 right now. They had risen consistently over $100 during the 2004 election.
“’What does the radical want? He wants a world in which the worth of the individual is recognized....A world based on the morality of mankind...The radical believes that all peoples should have a high standard of food, housing and health. The radical places human rights far above property rights. He is fro free, universal public education and recognizes this as fundamental to the democratic way of life... Democracy to him is working from the bottom up....the Radical believes completely in real quality of opportunity for all peoples regardless of race color or creed.’ - (quote from Saul Alinsky)
Much of what Alinsky professes does not sound ‘radical’. his are the words used in schools and churches, by our parents and their friends, by our peers. The difference is that Alinsky really believes in them and recognizes the necessity of changing the present structure of our lives in order to realize them.”
Regarding the issues you raise:
“Worth of the individual” According to which standard?
“Morality of mankind” Define moral. Define moral as it exists in various cultures.
“High standard of food, housing and health” Once again, compared to which concept of normal.
“Real equality of opportunity” Who decides this? Who enforces this? Globally?
“Changing the present structure of our lives” I used to think that was necessary and possible. Now, I don’t want to live as most North Koreans or Danes or Kenyans or French. The structure of a human life takes, if not infinite, then 1000s of variations. The wonder is in what is possible, not probable.
While I recognize the conceptual beauty of these thoughts, the reality of life itself is that even if we dared consider that some of these thoughts could be implemented, someone or someones have to decide what the standards are. THAT is not a power I willingly give to anyone but me.
bookmark for later
Hopefully, this thesis coming out party, coupled with the run for the presidency will educate millions of Americans of just how the “liberals” have hoodwinked them over the years.
It’s really quite extraordinary and very under-reported.
Hell's Bells....I was a card carrying ACLU member......My, how times change when you have responsibilities and bills to pay............
The bottom line is that Mr. Foster was murdered in a professional hit in a specific DC office (outside the WH) to which he was lured and ambushed. His body was then taken by car to its pre-designed dumping spot at Fort Marcy Park. In fact, his body arrived at FMP before before his car did (according to several eyewitnesses), which completely rules out the "suicide-in-the-park" fabrication.
Although HRC was conveniently out of town at the time of the crime, events following the crime show conclusively that she wasn't surprised at what had happened and she went into immediate cover-up mode. In other words, she was a central figure in a murder conspiracy.
GOPublius bandwith now exceeded.
BTW, her participation in a murder conspiracy is not at all inconsistent with her marxist upbringing.
Bump for later, bandwidth exceeded at the site.
I just can't escape a feeling that we're being hornswaggled here; and, that the poster was given a sanitized version of a thesis that might have contained much more Marxist and America -damning opinion than the current PDF.
Does anyone else note a similarity between billing records mysteriously appearing in a vacant room (just after expiration of statute of limitations) and a ... PDF copy of Hillary Rodhams senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning ?
I have not read the entire doc yet, but so far, the left-owned media can unapologetically rationalize about all of it.
What I would like to see is some FBI forensics experts authenticate the "original" document; and, Hillary's eyes when she claims it's the original.
One way to tell if it's been modified... and if it was Hillary and her operatives that clandestinely released the bogus doc...
... then, Hillary will pretend to be outraged at the release of the doc, and will attack the scoundrels that put it on the net..
However, if PDF represents the original unedited thesis, then she would would take a contrite and defensive tone.
I remain suspicious of the PDF's total authenticity.
Clinton in-house-leak to prevent an October Surprise?If the GOP is smart (BIG "if") then they won't make hay of this until October. They've got the document. They can sit on it until the time is right. Just like the Democrats did with the Foley emails.
You are free to go to Wellesley library and read it in person. If it is too far from you, you may have your local public library obtain the microfilm copy for you to read on interlibrary loan. Now that it is available on-line, it is likely much easier to get a copy from Wellesley (less demand).
It is authentic. If you read it you will see the logic of the document is absolutely inescapable. This is Hillary’s life plan. We have been watching it unfold for years.
Kerry’s service records would be considered the same way, but he had to approve their release. The way to get such information to the public is to publicly embarrass the candidate into approving the release of the information, not leaking it or publishing it without permission.
Well, there are a lot of dead people in the Cinton's past circle of friends. They will be silent.
And if Hillary fails to be elected, the Republicans will do her work for her.
Nice try. I find some conservatives find a completely principled position is difficult to handle. They want to use situational ethics to achieve what they believe to be the proper “conservative” outcome.
I am of the opinion that violating your core principles is never right, even to achieve what would be a “good result”.
Thus, in the topic which has stirred your ire, I apply conservative principles of law and order to determine that, absent clear and convincing evidence, we should respect the jury system and the judicial system, that law enforcement officers shouldn’t fire on suspects without a reasonable certainty of danger, should never do so without proper reporting, and should follow all the procedures they are pledged to follow and never lie to investigators for ANY reason.
Here, if there is a copyright issue, we should not as conservatives gleefully violate personal property rights, even if the outcome is the “correct” one. If we can violate her property rights, she can violate ours.
Of course, labelling me a troll is certainly easier for you than thinking and putting forth a supported position of your own. Refutation is a lot harder than name-calling.
That book was also published to the web in violation of the copyright.
Quoting things from a copyrighted source is fair use. Copying a copyrighted source to the internet for all to read is not fair use.
Uh oh...you’ve exceeded your bandwidth, can’t open this site...
One big difference, though, between the thesis and the Foley emails: the whole world now has access to the thesis via the Net, whereas only the 'Rats and their buddies (plus perhaps some friends of Foley) had access to the emails.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.