[Mr. Silverback]

There are links to further information at the source document.

If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

[Mr. Silverback]

BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

[Mr. Silverback]

ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

[JohnnyZ]

This anti-natalism is not limited to liberals. A few years ago, at a dinner I attended, a conservative Christian advocated sterilizing poor women as a solution to welfare dependency. And today, leading immigration-reform groups have links to zero-population growth advocates.

NumbersUSA is one of those anti-human groups who only oppose immigration (NOT illegal immigration -- all immigration) because it's part of their radical liberal zero population growth philosophy.

One of the leaders of this anti-human movement is John Tanton, a Planned Parenthood and anti-immigration leader who is a contributor to the Tom Tancredo campaign.

Tancredo took a lot of flack for accepting Tanton's support, but he apparently sees nothing wrong with it. It's very disappointing when conservatives don't see what kind of scum these people are who are trying to jump into bed with them to further their radical agenda.

[Hazcat]

Seems to me that both Blades and Colson miss the point.

Yes, children are a blessing (I have a son) BUT they are also a responsibility and if you cannot or do not want to bear that responsibility the DON’T breed!

Do not expect the rest of society to make up for your mistakes or uncaring attitude.

We will HELP once but we will NOT relieve you of your responsibilities or allow you to continue to burden us.

Actions have consequences!

[ari-freedom]

conservative Christian advocated sterilizing poor women as a solution to welfare dependency
-
what a horrible thing to say. Government did something stupid so let’s take it out on the victims of liberalism?
Perhaps should read Genesis 9:7

[Mamzelle]

re: This is only one example of the cultural message today driven home to Americans: that is, that large, or even medium-sized, families are an impediment to the good life. Even if the kids are not yours, their existence will have a negative impact on you—whether it’s higher taxes or global warming.)))

This is certainly the message I've gotten--other than chuches, there is a very real anti-child ethos in upper-middle-class America.

[Lexinom]

One person “reasoned” that if he has to pay $25 for a dog license, why should parents expect help when they “choose” to have kids.

What this poor, blind, myopic soul fails to see:

A) HE was once a "kid";

B) A dog cannot care for him in his old age.

[Tench_Coxe]

Perhaps Ms Blades response should be: " Well, I'm going to raise a big family. And one of the messages I shall impart is: read the responses to my idea of children. Remember, these people are your enemy. When these particular people grow old, deny them health care, remove their feeding tubes, pull away their oxygen tanks. As they wished to deny you life, so should you do the same to them."

Talk about libs wetting their pants.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Duped out of motherhood
Daily Mail 24th February 2006 | KATE MULVEY
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1585427/posts

[cpforlife.org]

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

[darth]

This is a fascinating look at one of those issues that cuts across traditional liberal/conservative lines. I have no problem with increasing human population or caring for children both born and unborn. I also believe that people should think long and hard about the number and quality of offspring that they bring into our world.

[Gene Eric]

It’s the epitome of human arrogance to define which of its own has the right to procreate.

[Coleus]

.