Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 last
To: LibWhacker
Quantum teleportation perhaps?
Mike
285 posted on
08/16/2007 4:12:13 PM PDT by
MichaelP
(I'll have another fine cigar please...)
To: LibWhacker
Hum.... to be honest it smells like “Cold Fusion” all over again. I heard Linus Pauling speak on that Matter at Oregon State University. I wonder what he would say now? Most likely, to what decimal degree was the TIME measured to. Because 1) 3 feet is not real far apart, and 2) More than likely there IS a time lag, they were simply not capable of measuring. Get those crystals a MILE apart and then we will have some idea of the accuracy of their claim. Until they can do this over a distance, one great enough to actually measure the difference with currently existing measuring equipment. The closer one gets to the speed of light the more infinitely short the time period becomes, it may LOOK like 0, but it isn’t. Any more than they can calculate the EXACT value of Pi.
290 posted on
08/16/2007 4:44:06 PM PDT by
Danae
(Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha (Smoke clears and Fred Thompson is President))
To: LibWhacker
292 posted on
08/16/2007 4:47:11 PM PDT by
Dajjal
To: LibWhacker
But can they fix the check engine light on my BMW ? NOOOO!
294 posted on
08/16/2007 4:49:40 PM PDT by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know. F Troop)
To: LibWhacker
So Obama can correct himself before he puts his foot in his mouth on foreign policy. Or Hillary can correct herself before she claimed she had never advocated socialized medicine. Or Edwards would never need another haircut - think of the money he will save. Wow.
295 posted on
08/16/2007 4:53:50 PM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: LibWhacker
According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second.If I'm not mistaken E=MC2 solved for C equated to mass becoming infinite, not energy.
296 posted on
08/16/2007 4:59:44 PM PDT by
fedupjohn
(If we try to fight the war on terror with eyes shut + ears packed with wax, innocent people will die)
To: ShasheMac; brityank; Forest Keeper; swatbuznik; Potts Mtn. Pappy; Kevmo; wastedyears; ...
Should I back my bags and hop aboard a ship to Alpha Centauri????
304 posted on
08/16/2007 6:16:37 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: LibWhacker
Why did I stop you? I clocked you doing 250,000 miles per second in a 186,000 mile per second zone, that's why, Einstein!
310 posted on
08/16/2007 8:41:20 PM PDT by
Reaganesque
(Romney for President 2008)
To: LibWhacker
Hmmmm . . .
So . . . the speed of light has been broken.
Well!
I’m sure her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous . . . Shrillery de Fosterizer de Marx de Machiavelli de Stalin would be happy to try and fix it. She’d only need a few $Triollion to get started. . . . for the children, of course.
= = =
Someone ought to ask her a question along those lines in an intense moment at a question and answer session. We might be able to get her to say something really stupid.
324 posted on
08/17/2007 1:52:31 AM PDT by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
To: LibWhacker
For instance, an astronaut moving faster than it would theoretically arrive at a destination before leaving. And get back just as fast?
Poor schmuck would probably get paid by the hour, too...
331 posted on
08/17/2007 2:30:27 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: LibWhacker
They've past ludicris speed and, gone straight to plaid!
338 posted on
08/17/2007 6:21:38 AM PDT by
SubGeniusX
($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
To: LibWhacker
A pair of German physicists claim to have broken the speed of light - an achievement that would undermine our entire understanding of space and time. According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would require an infinite amount of energy to propel an object at more than 186,000 miles per second.
What they and other have claimed to do with entangled photons is not breaking the speed of light. No thing is being propelled at more than 186,000 miles per second. As far as the special relativity is concerned, it really cannot prohibit the use of such a phenomenon for communication since communication is not a thing but a social construct, a mutually agreed upon set of expectations of what a particular symbology is meant to convey. But nothing subject to light speed restrictions is actually being physically conveyed across space or time.
366 posted on
08/20/2007 5:53:34 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: LibWhacker
372 posted on
08/28/2007 11:18:39 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Sunday, August 26, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson