RON PAUL DEFRAUDED BY IOWA STRAW POLL PROCESS -- Part I (LAUGH ALERT)

votefraud.org ^ | Jim Condit Jr.

[Chi-townChief]

This e-wire / report ultimately makes two points:

1. The voting process at the Iowa Straw Poll was a fraud, wrapped in lies. (Whenever those running any kind of an election use police power to hide all the ballots from the people, and then announce results (?) when supposedly (?) only they have seen the ballots – those people are frauds, are acting like Stalin-esque tyrants, and their organization is a fraud.

That award goes in our current drama to the Iowa GOP leadership, namely Ted Sporer, Chuck Laudner, Mary Tiffany, Craig Robinson, and Chairman Ray Hoffman. What they did to Ron Paul and all those who paid $35 to vote in the Iowa Straw Poll, and all those who entered into a contract with them by paying $35 to support the event, is UNCONSCIONABLE!

These KGB/GESTAPO TYPES, groveling before the sinister banking powers in NYC and behind the RNC and the DNC, -- and acting as their enforcers in Iowa -- hid all the EVIDENCE (the ballots) at the Iowa Straw Poll and announced the alleged results based on their assertion alone – which the rest of us are supposed to take and believe on blind faith!

I am joined by already thousands of others in saying: WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU! You hid the evidence! You have hidden the ballots – and now you have had time to switch the ballots! You fronted for crooks, thieves, enemies of America, enemies of honest people everywhere!

The US Supreme Court has ruled twice in the last one hundred years, in U.S v Mosley (1915) and Reynolds v Sims (1964), that our right to vote includes not only the right to cast a ballot, but the right to know that our vote was counted accurately.

There is only one reason to hide the ballots from press, from candidates, and from the people – because those so hiding the ballots want to keep open the option to cheat – to rig the election.

The evidence is the BALLOTS, which should have been kept in public view all day, and counted in the presence of ALL factions, before said ballots leave the public view.

LONGEST DELAY EVER

In 1995, when the “unbelievable” tie occurred between CFR favorites Senator Bob Dole and Senator Phil Graham – the doors were locked for two solid hours after the voting ended.

As I have said for years, only the GOP leadership was behind the locked doors in 1995, and all of them supported either Dole or Graham. The published “results” that year were that Buchanan, who by far got the best reception from the crowd, came in second with about 1950 – but that Dole and Graham “tied” for first place at exactly 2501 to 2501.

MANY people were not buying it, and Robert Novak of CNN suggested the next morning that the straw poll vote had been “cooked.” (By the way, Fred Smart interviewed a person on Saturday who also gave his witness from 1995 that only Dole and Graham people were behind the locked doors in the “counting” room in 1995.)

Our strong suspicion was that Buchanan came in first in 1995, but this result was unpalatable to the Neo-Cons running the GOP in NYC and D.C. So, the Dole and Graham people wanted to place Buchanan in second place, but neither would give way to the other on first place. Thus, the almost impossible tie was agreed upon.

This year of 2007 saw the longest delay EVER – 15 minutes loger than the 1995 delay. In 2007, the Ron Paul year, -- it was 2 hours and 15 minutes before the announcement came from the podium.

THE BEST HUNCH

While we are totally devoid of evidence (the ballots), the best analysis I’ve heard is this: that probably Dr. Paul came in second to Romney who spent hundreds of thousands of $$ to bus in people.

However, this result – Ron Paul coming in second place in the 2007 Iowa Straw Poll -- was totally unpalatable to the Iowa GOP and their NYC masters and D.C. handlers. Such a result would have shown both the GOP at the state and national level, and the 5 Big TV Networks – to be liars and falsifiers of evidence up until the Iowa Straw Poll.

The World Tyranny Ruling Elite needed Paul to appear to finish near the bottom so that they could ignore him completely on the mass media. Therefore, the suspicion is that Ron Paul’s vote was partially stolen and distributed to Huckabee, Brownback, and Romney. (Tancredo would not be helped by the Iowa GOP, despite his neo-con outlook on foreign affairs, because his anti-illegal immigration stance is completely unpalatable to the Ruling Elite in NYC and D.C. who dictate to the Iowa GOP, and all other state GOPs.)

As usual in computer-generated elections – everything came up smelling like roses for the Neo-con wirepullers behind the scenes of both parties.

THE AFFIDAVITS ARE ESSENTIAL! PLEASE HELP!

2. We need the affidavits of 1306+ Iowans who voted at the straw poll for Ron Paul – in order to prove, if such is the case, that the PUBLISHED count which the Iowa GOP announced was not accurate with regard to Ron Paul’s vote. (All who actually voted are welcome to submit affidavits.)

SOME DISTURBING NUMBERS

The comprehensive published “results” will be in a future report in this series -- view them online here:

http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ron_paul_2008/2007/08/iowa-straw-poll.html

-- but at this point the reader may want to know that the Iowa GOP claims that Romney came in first with 4516 votes, and Ron Paul came in 5th with 1305 votes.

Hear ye! Hear ye! The Ron Paul Campaign has confirmed to callers what was repeated at the event itself -- that the campaign bought and gave away 800 tickets. The “Adopt an Iowan group” (an independent effort) has published that they had collected $22,500 and purchased 643 tickets. (By the way, since the “Adopt and Iowan” page won’t allow you to copy it, I have printed it out to preserve the documentation.)

So now we are being asked to believe that Ron Paul got less votes (1305) than the tickets purchased by the campaign and the “Adopt an Iowan” campaign (totally 1443) – and that NO ONE in Iowa came on their own to pay $35 and vote for Ron Paul !!!!!

The Ron Paul Campaign AND the Adopt an Iowan campaign kept track of who the tickets were given to (I hope). This is enough affidavits to prove that the announced Diebold “count” was wrong. – And we want to find as many other Iowa citizens as possible who paid $35 out of their own pocket to vote – so we can get their affidavits also.

This seems to be a smoking gun. This will be the greatest and most irrefutable proof ever that a Diebold computer was used to rig an election!

We need the affidavits of any Iowan who voted for Ron Paul at the Ames, Iowa Straw Poll. If we succeed – then we will have the proof that the Diebold computers at the Iowa Straw Poll of 2007 – were rigged.

If you voted in the Iowa Straw Poll on August 11, 2007 – and if you need an affidavit to make sure your vote counts, and especially if you want to help us prove whether or not the result published for Ron Paul was accurate – you can go to:

www.votefraud.org/iowa_straw_poll_2007_report_affidavit_part1.htm

At the top and bottom of that article is a link to the relevant affidavit. Simply right click on the link, use “Save target as” and save the word document to your computer where you can find it. You will then have an affidavit to fill out, and get notarized at a bank, Kinkos, etc., and to mail back to us.

A number of affidavits are already in hand.

End of this e-wire.

Jim Condit Jr.

[IslandJeff]

Chanukah Dradle contest...

Dreidel, you anti-Semite. Aren't you on the CFR? ;-)

[philman_36]

Guess what, bright boy, I've held my beliefs long before Paul entered the stage.
If you want to sympathize with people who just rolled over to Communists then you just go ahead.
You'll fit right in when they take over America too.

[philman_36]

Not even close. The NVA was way too much for a bunch of civilians to handle.
They had years to fight the NVA before they overran the south. THAT was the time to fight and didn't!
Your cart is before your horse as well.

[Mr. Silverback]

Suit yourself. I just naturally assumed you'd prefer that to being referred to (no less accurately, I might add) as my b!tch.

I laughed until I hurt.

[KDD]

ARVN sure didn't want to fight.
I think some of them wore black pjs at night.

[philman_36]

As a matter of fact after the Tet Offensive is when they should've joined the SVA en masse to finish eliminating the NVA. They chose instead to let American boys do the job instead of doing what was their responsibility.

[philman_36]

ARVN sure didn't want to fight.
Shhhhh...you'll burst preconceived thought bubbles.

[Mr. Silverback]

Keep the spam in your cupbosrd, please.

[Mr. Silverback]

So, why these defensive measures?

Excellent question.

[philman_36]

Foreign Relations, 1964-1968, Volume VI, Vietnam, January-August 1968
10. The overall position of the government has been weakened. Its prestige has suffered from the shock of the Tet offensive; its control over the countryside has been greatly reduced. Popular attitudes are confused and contradictory; the Viet Cong received virtually no popular support, but neither was there a rallying to the government side. Passivity is likely to continue as the dominant attitude in most of the population, but further military defeats could cause a sudden swing away from the government. While the central authority in Saigon is unlikely to collapse, its ability to provide energetic leadership throughout the country and all levels is in serious doubt. It is possible that over the next few months certain provinces, especially in I and IV Corps, will be lost to Saigon's effective authority.

[KDD]

We understand that you can’t fight a war just around the edges. Mothers and fathers will not long be willing to sacrifice their suns and daughters for such an uncertain and doubtful reason as Arab Freedom. It is painful enough to see our children die in defence of our own freedom and prosperity .

[Mr. Silverback]

Ah...I see you own a copy of Zapp Brannigan’s Big Book of War. Gotcha. Lead on, General. (Chortle!)

[IslandJeff]

So what should we fight for?

[KDD]

You are welcome to ignore my posts. What you call “spam” is my method of answering an inquiry...or making one.

[Mr. Silverback]

As a matter of fact after the Tet Offensive is when they should've joined the SVA en masse to finish eliminating the NVA. They chose instead to let American boys do the job instead of doing what was their responsibility.

If punks like you get your way and we cede the field to the enemy in Iraq, you will be saying the same thing about the Iraqis in ten years even though they are enlisting and fighting and dying.

165,000 people die and you say it's no big deal and that they deserved it. What a load of bilge.

[Mr. Silverback]

The two of you still have nothing of import to say.

And it's still so cute when you say that!

[KDD]

even if the grunts on the ground don't know or don't like the policies that put them there...they fight first for each other...for the Esprit de corps.

[philman_36]

If punks like you...
When you have nothing else name calling will do?
...get your way...
My way is to go over there, kick ass overwhelmingly and come home forthwith!
...and we cede the field to the enemy in Iraq...
Agian agitprop rears its ugly head. We would be ceding the country to the people of Iraq. It is nothing more than conjecture that we cede the field to "the enemy".
...you will be saying the same thing about the Iraqis in ten years even though they are enlisting and fighting and dying.
Have you got anything besides conjecture?

[IslandJeff]

http://www.lp.org/media/article_500.shtml

Does Congressman Paul have an “exit strategy”?

[philman_36]

And it's still so cute when you say that!
And it's even cuter when you can't, and don't, deny it.