I wonder if Mitt would carry Massachusetts in the general election?
The meaning of these statements, reads like trying to catch a moth in a dark room.
He was opposed to the Presidents 2003 tax cuts? woooo, that does it for me......no support here.
The most obvious trouble for Mitt Romney is explaining what is called, RomneyCare. RomneyCare is big liberal government-forced healthcare insurance system, that includes mandates for individuals & employers, minimum coverage requirements, subsidized insurance for the poor & government enforced fines for noncompliance. RomneyCare is reliant on federal funds. Estimate of $150-million in cost overruns expected for 2007. There is no real reform in RomneyCare. It even allows for taxpayer funded abortions. Imposes criminal sanctions on individuals and obligations on businesses. This results in government guaranteeing healthcare as a virtual right. In the end RomneyCare will not only be expensive but a perscription for more government spending and more government intrusion.
Wow - how soon people forget.
Let me reprise: Massachusetts politician = northeast, lefty, gun-grabbin, lying, tax-raising, baby-killing, criminal coddling scumbag.
Mass used to be a great place to live. That ended about the time The Hero Of Chappaquiddick first got elected to the senate.
Hey, I’m not bitter...
Yet another Romney flip-flop. Today Romney bashes McCain and Thompson for supporting McCain-Feingold years ago, but at the time Mitt was pushing an even more anti-free speech, anti-Constitutional plan for campaign finance.