Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Children may lose out on insurance (Bush hates "chirren," Teddy loves 'em)
The Boston Globe ^ | August 22, 2007 | Alice Dembner, Globe Staff

Posted on 08/22/2007 9:11:59 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle

New US rules, state plan linked

Thousands of Massachusetts children from low-income families could be denied health insurance under new rules imposed by the Bush administration late last week. The rules could cut federal matching funds for a state-run program that is a key component of the state's health insurance initiative.

But congressional leaders, including Senator Edward Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, said yesterday that they would fight the changes, which are the latest volley in the national battle over the future of the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP.

Using a combination of state and federal funds, the program covers some 6.6 million children nationally and 90,500 in Massachusetts in low-income families.

As part of its health insurance reform, Massachusetts expanded eligibility to children in families earning up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, or $61,950 for a family of four. The change was made last year with federal approval and brought coverage to about 14,000 more Massachusetts children.

In Massachusetts, the program is the main means of insuring children in families above the poverty level who do not qualify for Medicaid and who frequently cannot afford private insurance. The state's health insurance initiative did not include any other effort to cover children.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: healthcare; kennedy; romneycare; socialism
The Socialists in Massachusetts rise up!
1 posted on 08/22/2007 9:12:01 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

It wouldn’t be so bad going without insurance if the uninsured weren’t charged three or four times what the insured were.

A family where the breadwinner lost his job could be looking at 1500 a month in COBRA payments to keep insurance.

Or they could take their chances that no one will get seriously hurt and sick and risk losing their home if someone does.

Mrs VS


2 posted on 08/22/2007 9:20:54 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

$61,950 is “low income”? I thought that was The Rich? Oh, that’s right, you’re not Rich until you make $62,000. That $50 sure makes a difference. There’s such a fine line between genius and stupidity.


3 posted on 08/22/2007 9:20:55 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

The “article” is dripping with bias.


4 posted on 08/22/2007 9:29:28 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
yikes...do the math....

"...children in families earning up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, or $61,950 for a family of four. The change was made last year with federal approval and brought coverage to about 14,000 more Massachusetts children.

In Massachusetts, the program is the main means of insuring children in families above the poverty level who do not qualify for Medicaid and who frequently cannot afford private insurance. The state's health insurance initiative did not include any other effort to cover children.

The new federal rules could block enrollment of more children above 250 percent of the poverty level and could make it tougher for the state to continue covering about 4,500 already enrolled. State officials said they do not yet have a count of the number who are eligible but not enrolled."


Shoot me now.....
5 posted on 08/22/2007 9:30:03 AM PDT by stylin19a (Go Bears !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Teddy sure loves his pork.


6 posted on 08/22/2007 9:31:06 AM PDT by cake_crumb (May I never live to see the day America has a 'popular war'. God bless our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

This is nothing but corporate welfare for politically-connected insurance companies and their lobbyists, paid for by taxpayers who lead semi-responsible lives.


7 posted on 08/22/2007 9:32:49 AM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

That’s what he’s made of!


8 posted on 08/22/2007 9:33:58 AM PDT by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Teddy is pork.

9 posted on 08/22/2007 9:34:05 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gunservative
This is nothing but corporate welfare for politically-connected insurance companies and their lobbyists, paid for by taxpayers who lead semi-responsible lives.

SHHHH!! How are people supposed to feeeeeeeeel good about themselves for supporting this "progressive" "enlightened" garbage if they know the truth?

10 posted on 08/22/2007 9:40:49 AM PDT by M203M4 (Vote conservatism in 2008, have some standards - a Marxist is a Marxist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gunservative

Yup, disguised as “help for poor children.”


11 posted on 08/22/2007 9:45:27 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Or they could take their chances that no one will get seriously hurt and sick and risk losing their home if someone does.

Or get a high deductible policy that runs far less than your $1500 price tag. My soon-to-be-wife's job offers really lousy health insurance, so she bought her own high deductible policy. It's something like $250 for the year. Cheap.

12 posted on 08/22/2007 9:46:25 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
This is election year rhetoric almost verbatim. This S-chip program is socialized medicine......it is Universal Health Care through the back door.....it is an entitlement that is unconstitutional. The "children" in this case is from cradle to 25 years of age......something is wrong with the whole picture. Drive by Media's approach, don't fall for it. President Bush will veto it if it infringes on the 'rights' of taxpayers as well as the U.S. Constitution, he will also ask for some parental responsibility....not government responsibility.

Hillary’s 15 minutes of fame….Universal Health Care…..from behind closed doors.

Veto this Mr. President!

13 posted on 08/22/2007 9:51:08 AM PDT by yoe ( NO THIRD TERM FOR THE CLINTON'S!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius

I’d love to hear about what policy that is, and what state, and what the deductible is exactly, because we’ve looked for such things in NJ and not found them.

Anyway, what really ticks me, as I said, is that the uninsured are supposed to pay three or four times as much as the insurance companies pay for the insured. That’s just wrong. If I pay out of pocket, the provider has lower overhead than if he/she/it is dealing with the insurance company.

Mrs VS


14 posted on 08/22/2007 10:04:26 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
we’ve looked for such things in NJ and not found them.

Well, you can thank your legislators for that. New Jersey is one of a few states that significantly restrict inexpensive and short-term health insurance. Move out of New Jersey.

15 posted on 08/22/2007 10:33:50 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

“$61,950 is “low income”?”

I wonder what the limit is for a Parent and child only?
I wish I made $60000 year! I own a home, put one child through 9 years of private school and now helping pay for community college. ALL on LESS than 60 grand!


16 posted on 08/22/2007 10:50:42 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Giving of your own time and money to assist the needy, without harboring ulterior motives, is compassionate.

Almost everything else, including taking time and money from others (by implied threat of force) to give to the "needy" is just plain stealing. It's even worse because Ted Kennedy et al. has ulterior motivation...buying votes to stay in power.

17 posted on 08/22/2007 10:52:32 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson