Posted on 08/24/2007 4:50:51 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
As related in my blog post yesterday, Dennis Kucinich felt that ABC News was unfair in the way it covered him following last Sunday's debate sponsored by that network. Well, statistical analysis provided of the words spoken and the time alloted to each candidate shows that ABC News was indeed extremely unfair to both Kucinich and Mike Gravel during the debate itself. Here is the analysis by USA Election Polls:
We took a look at the entire ABC News Debate transcript from 8/19, parsed the file, and counted how many words each of the candidates were able to speak. The two candidates with the least amount of words were Kucinich and Gravel. Obama and Clinton as you would expect dominated in how many words they were able to speak.
The total number of words spoken at the debate was 14,528. Stephanopoulos spoke 1907 words and Yepsen spoke 197 so a total of 12,424 words were spoken by the candidates. Here is how it broke down.
Candidate Words % of Total
Barack Obama 2462 19.8%
Hillary Clinton 2399 19.3%
John Edwards 1644 13.2%
Joe Biden 1415 11.4%
Bill Richardson 1319 10.6%
Chris Dodd 1230 9.9%
Dennis Kucinich 1059 8.5%
Mike Gravel 896 7.2%
Even more damning of the obvious favoritism displayed by ABC News was the analysis of just the first half of the debate when most of the viewers were watching:
But the biggest discrepancy comes when you only look at the first half of the debate. If you only looked at all the words spoken up to the half point, Word # 7264, here is how it broke down.
Candidate Words % of Total
Hillary Clinton 1465 25.2%
John Edwards 1093 18.8%
Barack Obama 953 16.4%
Joe Biden 758 13.0%
Bill Richardson 680 11.7%
Chris Dodd 548 9.4%
Mike Gravel 325 5.6%
Dennis Kucinich 204 3.4%
So it turns out that Dennis Kucinich was allowed to speak less than one-seventh of the time as Hillary Clinton during the important first half of the debate. While John Edwards complains about the unfairness of Fox News as an excuse to boycott any debate sponsored by that network, a statistical breakdown of the ABC News debate shows which news organization is the one that is really unfair. USA Election Polls concludes:
So what happened was Kucinich was practically ignored during the entire first half of the debate and at the end of the debate (garbage time) the moderators tried to make it a bit equal. Too much emphasis was given to the top tier candidates. In fact, even Chris Dodd got more air time than Kucinich which is ridiculous because Kucinich is beating Dodd in the majority of state polls. So if the emphasis was on giving the most time to the leaders in the polls, then what was Dodd doing speaking more than Kucinich.
One fringe benefit for Dennis Kucinich of being almost totally ignored by ABC News was that it allowed him to get off the best line of the debate. When asked by debate moderator George Stephanopoulis for his view of a personal God that responds to personal prayers, Kucinich bitingly replied:
George, I've been standing here for the last 45 minutes praying to God you were going to call on me.
Headline should read:
“Marketing Arm of DNC Allowed to Moderate Democrat Debate”
or
“Show Debate Glorifies DNC Favorites”
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Oh, puh-leeze!
Is this what we've come down to? Counting words to determine "fairness"?
First of all, an eloquent speaker can make his point in fewer words. (Cheney, for example, is great at this).
Second, Kucinich who? Gravel who? Limit the debate to the top four players -- the others are taking up space. President Kucinich indeed.
“He’s a kook but even a kook is right once a day.”
I prefer a broken clock. :)
Obama speaks two or three times slower than Hillary. I would be curious as to the breakdown of seconds or minutes spoken between Obama and Hillary (not just words).I think you would find that Obama clearly spoke several more minutes than Hillary, if not more than just several.
Hypothesis:
Distorting the attention in favor of the front runners and ignoring the kooks is beneficial to a party overall.
I’ll bet the MSM provides this benefit much more significantly to the Dems than to the Republicans.
The study would analyze how much the word count correlates with the poll standings. More correlation=more assistance to that party.
Welcome to the GOP world, whereas the republican candidate is only allowed to respond to the Drive By’s accusations and more often than not, cannot get a word in edgewise.
The problem is, the TV cameras won’t turn down low enough to see anything but the top of his head.
Just shut up and sing!
Oh, wait. Wrong thread.
I love Dennis Kucinich!!! LKet’s hope he makes it to the finals
When any pollster calls tell them your favorite is KUCINICH!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.