Posted on 08/25/2007 5:45:03 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance
Many reasons, the easiest is that Republican judicial nominees will one day end the bogus "right" to unfettered abortions.
The killing of 40 million American babies, the most beautiful and innocent of our blessings, is abhorrent to me.
Whine all you want little lady. I and many others aren’t intimidated by your scare mongering. What a bunch of cowards.
The article is drivel... the primary has not happened yet...
When it does happen, you will know who is the winner of the general election if Julie-Annie is the GOP nominee...
Maybe someday. Right now it still isn’t that big an issue in the public mind.
Here on FR, sure, but not among the general public. Those who ran in the last election as specifically anti-ilegal alien did not do all that well.
I would guess that no more than 10 to 20% of the population fits the Freeper profile. Face it, we’re a fringe group.
Nothing wrong with that in itself. So were the early proponents of American independence and the abolitionists. They didn’t win till they put together a coalition, which occurred in each case in the middle of a major war, which I’d prefer to avoid if possible.
If Julie-Annie is the GOP nominee he will lose... so pay attention... I will not vote for the S.O.B.
Whats happened to the right wing is the mystery..
"They" are seething some where, extremely mad..
Probably Sandy Berger was the straw that broke the CAMELS BACK..
The camel jockeys are on their way.. the right wing is listening for the hoof beats..
Why? Want to leave it to your kids and grandkids???
Those wars happened because it was avoided too many times before.
I'm ready...
Recently, I had a die hard claim to me that I would vote for Pol Pot for president if he were running as a Republican.
I pointed out that Pol Pot would be running as a Democrat but he wouldn't find the Republican to his liking and would allow Pol Pot to be elected.
Sometimes it's painful, but politicians do learn. Perot would not have existed as an real candidate until Bush 41 alienated his voting base by raising taxes and signing gun control.
Since Bush 41's reelection loss to the Arkansas grifter, very few Republicans have come out in favor of raising taxes or more gun control.
It will be much easier to do that now that we've watched the Democrat cowards in action. The Democrat reign of terror is about to come to an end. Is it any wonder why people identifying themselves as Democrats is the lowest in 10 years.
If Rudy or Mitt are the nominee I will not be voting Republican this time.. Its that simple, Life is my must have issue one is pro choice the other lies about being pro life..
Me neither. Add Romney as well.
You forgot the arrogance of the GOP lapdogs. They lost an election and adopted every failed tactic the democrats had. They can’t sell a politician so they threaten with a democrat. People don’t agree so they try to ridicule them into agreement.
At this point I expect to hear them crying that the democrats stole the election when the GOP loses.
No different...
” The Democrat reign of terror is about to come to an end.”
LOL
What reign of terror is that? Eight months of controlling Congress? You cheapen history with such hysteria.
Yellow Dog Republicans will talk about "compromise" and "accommodation," much as Vidkun Quisling invoked the same principles when Hitler asked him to make nice. And they'll ignore the first-order consequences of their actions when they help a leftist -- albeit one with an "R" after his name -- win. Furthermore, they'll have the audacity to hint that God endorses their tepid candidates, despite the fact that Jesus exhorted His followers to act on principle, not expediency.
No, the RINO is a far greater enemy to conservatives than the liberal.
Timing your wars can be critical.
If America had struck for independence 20 years earlier, it would have failed miserably. Too few people in the country. 20 years later, and it wouldn’t really have been that much of a fight. Too many people and spread out too much to conquer.
If the South had seceded in 1850, they would have won. The infrastructure to support its conquest (mostly railroads and industry) wasn’t extensive enought yet, and the disproportion in potential power between the sections was much smaller. In 1870 the Union would have won much more easily, as the disproportion in potential power was that much greater.
I’m not sure what great issue, equivalent in importance to independence or slavery, you think we should fight another civil war over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.