Debating Ron Paul

National Ledger ^ | Aug 29, 2007 | JB Williams

[PlainOleAmerican]

Ron Paul supporters are fast making a name for themselves on the web. Not because they are just web savvy, but because they have proven themselves to be the best at hacking on-line polls, invalidating conservative polling data on behalf of their candidate. It seems that even Democrat 527 MoveOn.org is now onboard the Ron Paul anti-war train.

Despite the fact that presidential candidate Ron Paul can not score better than 3% in any legitimate national poll, his supporters claim he is “the conservative” candidate to beat in the 2008 Republican race for the White House. Despite his less than conservative voting record in congress and his Teddy Kennedy like position on the war on terror in Iraq, his supporters think he is the most “conservative” candidate in the race. How?

[Dead Corpse]

Those 50% who don’t vote at all aren’t given much to be interested in voting for. Not with the GOP leadership pushing a$$bats like McCain and Guilani.

[logician2u]

So you've never seen a picture of Stan Laurel?

Of course, and he bears absolutely no resemblence to Ron Paul. Wrong color hair, for one.

I've never seen a picture of Stan Hardy, though, the person you named in #221.

Minor discrepency, but indicative of the dyslexia exhibited by some of you anti-Paul posters.

Humorous jibes are much more effective when they have some degree of truth in them, you know.

[logician2u]

Thanks. I intend to d/l it and read it over the long weekend.

Probably a good deal better than Gore Vidal's, which I have not read but intend to eventually.

[MEGoody]

Of course, and he bears absolutely no resemblence to Ron Paul.

I didn't say he did. I said the sketch on the poster bore a resemblance to Stan Laurel.