Skip to comments.
Defense Focus: Diesel sub wonder weapons
United Press International ^
| Aug. 31, 2007
| MARTIN SIEFF
Posted on 08/31/2007 11:21:11 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
Our national policies toward China are suicidal. It baffles me how anyone could fail to realize this.
21
posted on
08/31/2007 11:46:55 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
To: sukhoi-30mki
actually,
diesel subs would be pretty pathetic.
its the diesel-electric subs you need to worry about!
22
posted on
08/31/2007 11:50:50 AM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: Abathar
And the french have devised a way to snorkle while submerged
23
posted on
08/31/2007 11:54:10 AM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Pyro7480
I thought they used a wire-guided Mk48, pre-ADCAP?
24
posted on
08/31/2007 11:54:42 AM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Badeye
25
posted on
08/31/2007 11:54:55 AM PDT
by
rwa265
To: MindBender26
so long as they stay submerged
26
posted on
08/31/2007 11:57:39 AM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: 2banana
"Yeah - a modern nuclear attack submarine sinks a WWII cruiser that was being held together with chewing gum and bailing wire..."
Exactly -- the author writes as though it were some impressive feat..... I would hate to have been in the crew of the obsolete cruiser heading into that encounter....
27
posted on
08/31/2007 11:57:50 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: rwa265
Anything in the worlds oceans ‘worry the Navy’.
28
posted on
08/31/2007 12:00:23 PM PDT
by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: petertare; All
29
posted on
08/31/2007 12:00:27 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: SJSAMPLE
Britain doesn’t have the MK-48.The Conqueror fired British MK-8 torpedoes,though she also had the MK-24 Tigerfish.
To: SJSAMPLE; Zerodown
From:
General BelgranoAt 15:57 on May 2, Conqueror fired three conventional Mk 8 mod 4 torpedoes, each with an 800 lb (363 kg) Torpex warhead, two of which hit the General Belgrano. The Conqueror was also equipped with the newer Mark 24 Tigerfish homing torpedo, but there were doubts about its reliability. The Mk 8 dated back to the 1930s and was not a homing design.
31
posted on
08/31/2007 12:02:54 PM PDT
by
Pyro7480
("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
To: SJSAMPLE
The Mk 48 can operate with or without wire guidance
32
posted on
08/31/2007 12:05:21 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Is that eight torpedo tubes up front??? How many can they fire at once? And at what rate, I wonder...
33
posted on
08/31/2007 12:06:39 PM PDT
by
Bat_Chemist
(The devil has already outsmarted every athiest.)
To: mylife
I rode diesel subs in the early 60’s.
34
posted on
08/31/2007 12:12:43 PM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: Badeye
On a personal note, my son is a nuclear reactor operator on a Los Angeles class fast attack submarine. I asked him about the Chinese diesels, expecting him to say they weren’t that big a deal. He said they are very worrisome because they are difficult to detect on radar.
If you don’t want to worry about them, fine. But my son is a lot smarter than I am about these things. If he says they’re something to worry about, I’m glad the Navy is acting on it, at least as long as he’s on a sub.
35
posted on
08/31/2007 12:12:55 PM PDT
by
rwa265
To: mylife
For every Chi-Com diesel vibrating its way undersea you can rest assured there is a “silent” nuke on its tail ready to strike. You can’t see or hear em but let me tell ya my collectivist friends they are there. We are NOT afraid, that is all!
36
posted on
08/31/2007 12:14:19 PM PDT
by
Camel Joe
(liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
To: blam
I never rode diesels. I rode 637s, but I did work on the Bonefish which was a diesel
37
posted on
08/31/2007 12:14:23 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Camel Joe
38
posted on
08/31/2007 12:15:41 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The diesel boats are much quieter. The US needs a couple of dozen for Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean duty.
39
posted on
08/31/2007 12:17:18 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: taxcontrol
And with some of the new fuel cell technologies, it is quite possible that diesel boats can be even quieter than Nukes.
Diesel boats on battery power ARE quieter than Nucs.
40
posted on
08/31/2007 12:19:07 PM PDT
by
rottndog
(Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson