[MovementConservative]

this is really getting ridiculous. just have the states vote alphabetically or something random.

[Doogle]

I could never understand WHY.....but as always, you can rest assure, if it means more $$$$$$ for Hillary, thats the reason. Have you ever recalled a time in the last 16 years where enormous amounts of money was being tossed around and a Clinton was absent?

[PAR35]

I still don’t see why states that are having major elections in November, 2007 don’t go ahead and put the primary on at the same time. It would save a significant amount of money for the taxpayers.

[moonhawk]

The present system is why we are burning food in our gas tanks...Gotta keep those Iowa farmers happy.

Talk about the tail wagging the dog....

[freekitty]

I am beginning to wonder if this is a trick to decide who gets to be President by a selected few and not the voter.

[Vinomori]

We pray for the law of unintended consequences to kick in.

[Calpernia]

A lot of these date changes aren’t being made with notice for candidates to file or register.

[dalight]

I believe that increasing the number of uncommitted delegates would have a tendency of driving these primaries back into the right period. If the State Party delegates were elected and and only half allowed to commit to a specific candidate.. then the decision would be made at the convention again, where it should be made.

[noah]

Has anyone suggested the “Peak Load Pricing Model” as a solution to the “race to the front” in the states’ competition for primary position?