Posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:37 AM PDT by doug from upland
AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court
DATELINE Los Angeles
FreeRepublic.com
Doug from Upland
It is called the “Stanley Mosk Courthouse” after the man who was the longest serving justice on the California Supreme court, 37 years, from 1964-2001. The address is 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.
During the campaign of 2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton will be paying a visit, but it won’t be by choice. She won’t be sitting in the lawyer chair. She will be sitting in the witness/defendant chair.
The case is Paul v Clinton, an historic civil case involving an impeached former president and sitting senator accused of a committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media. Yes, “Spiderman” Stan Lee. The case is expected to highlight information over which the mainstream media has maintained a cone of silence. That information is the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the compromising of all three branches of government by a senator whose power is second only to that of the President of the United States. Many journalists, newspaper editors, and TV and radio news shows are in possession of a wealth of information about the case that has been discussed on the phone with them and sent to them. It includes compelling documents, photos, and video of Hillary Clinton.
On September 7, 2007, a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case. Despite having been alerted, the mainstream media has not seen fit to report that news. Apparently it did not meet the criteria pursuant to the masthead logo of the NY TIMES - “All the news that’s fit to print.” Some news is more fit than others.
Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client is not a felon, should remain protected by California’s anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants. The court should quickly make its decision, and discovery can then proceed. If Kendall loses, he may appeal to the California Supreme Court. That procedure is not expected to be a lengthy one, and the court ruled previously that it would not throw out the case regarding the former impeached president.
*** For full disclosure and in fairness to Mr. Kendall, I can say unequivocally that I have not seen him sit on his briefcase during any of the hearings I've attended.
Even if she is not brought back into the case as a defendant, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is going to be under oath. At a hearing in 2006, the Superior Court trial judge, Aurelio Munoz told Kendall, “I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying……did you hear that, Mr. Kendall?”
The court case of a former impeached president and a sitting senator might normally be a headline generator. Unfortunately, the shameless partisanship of the mainstream media is on display as never before. It is there for everyone to see.
As background for those who may not be familiar with the issues in the case, that would be viewers of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and readers of the NY Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Chicago Sun Times, Boston Globe, Denver Post, Dallas Morning News, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Detroit Free Press, Philadelphia Inquirer, Minneapolis (Red)Star Tribune, The Plain Dealer, the Arizona Republic, Houston Chronicle, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Miami Herald, DesMoines Register, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, TIME Magazine, Newsweek, US News & World Report…….…well, you get the idea --- we are glad to be of service and welcome aboard. Here are some links that you might find helpful.
To anyone from the mainstream media who is just starting the learn about the greatest campaign finance fraud in history, I welcome you. We have regular and Decaf, and I’ll even supply some donuts. Get busy reading. Don’t you think it is about time to do your job? Does the word “journalist” mean something to you?
ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS: HILLCAP DOT ORG
EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION SITE with latest documentary trailer: EJFA DOT ORG
THE TIMELINE: This tells the story with links
THIS ILLEGAL DONATION (with photos) FROM A JAPANESE NATIONAL HAS NEVER BEEN RETURNED OR REPORTED
THE LARGEST DONOR IN HISTORY HAS THREE TIMES DEMANDED THAT HILLARY RETURN HIS ILLEGAL DONATION
OH MY, "SPIDERMAN" STAN LEE ADMITTING TO "EXCHANGING CHECKS" IN HIS VIDEO DEPOSITION....WHOOPS!
THE SMOKING GUN VIDEO. An agent of Hillary, a White House employee, helped solicit a 1.6 mil in-kind contribution. This video is evidence of Hillary's knowledge, involvement, approval, and participation.
HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE "IRREGULARITIES" REPORTED TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES
HILLARY SPOKESMAN HOWARD WOLFSON HAS MAINTAINED THE LIE FOR SEVEN YEARS
TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN - we need your help to break the news blockade of the mainstream media
ART MOORE'S WND STORY ABOUT THE TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN
MOMMY DEAREST SETS UP CHELSEA FOR PERJURY
DO NOT MISS THE 7-PART "FRAUDULENT SENATOR" SERIES
AND FINALLY, JOIN ME IN A FUN SING-ALONG
Same question from me.
Anyone check to see if Doug is still alive?
I think that Libby recalled, but didn't recall exactly as Tim Russert did and thus was determined to have lied. If he had just taken a note from Hill's playbook, he'd have been a lot better off.
The only news is that a few journalists are seriously looking at the story.
On the chance that some prosecutor might be willing to do the right thing, then Hillary could be prosecuted for perjury. I’ve just been thinking in terms of campaign finance felonies.
It gets more interesting the more you explain it. I keep picking up on more things. Thank you for putting that in a large font, it caught my attention. More than usual anyway.
Keep on DFU
Here’s hoping that he can’t say anything more at this moment on the remote chance that it could upset the apple cart. I’d rather see her go under than be kept up to date. I’m sure he’ll inform us when he can.
pinging for those who might have missed it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.